Cargando…
PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients
OBJECTIVE: The molecular classification of CNS tumors has revolutionized our understanding of the biological heterogeneity and diversity of tumor subtypes. DNA methylation-based classification allows to discriminate subtypes. Although DNA methylation-based classification can diagnose tumors with hig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.589 |
_version_ | 1784720194437906432 |
---|---|
author | Drexler, Richard Eckhardt, Alicia Bode, Helena Lamszus, Katrin Westphal, Manfred Schüller, Ulrich Mohme, Malte |
author_facet | Drexler, Richard Eckhardt, Alicia Bode, Helena Lamszus, Katrin Westphal, Manfred Schüller, Ulrich Mohme, Malte |
author_sort | Drexler, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The molecular classification of CNS tumors has revolutionized our understanding of the biological heterogeneity and diversity of tumor subtypes. DNA methylation-based classification allows to discriminate subtypes. Although DNA methylation-based classification can diagnose tumors with high specificity, there are tumors which cannot be classified. We aimed to gain further insight into these challenging cases. METHODS: Overall, 21 patients with a CNS tumor that was non-classifiable (confidence score <0.3), or had a low confidence score (<0.9) using the DNA methylation-based classifier version 11b4, were included. Tumors were re-classified using version (v12.3), and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 21 pediatric and adolescent brain tumors with a calibrated score below 0.9 in the classifier output were identified. Of these, 11 patients (52.4 %) were assigned to the “no matching methylation class” with a score below 0.3. IDH-wild type glioblastoma (23.8 %), ETMR (14.3 %), and DMG (14.3 %) were the most common histological diagnoses. Surgical and clinicopathological features as well as DNA input and tumor purity did not influence the confidence score. Cases with non-classifiable tumors had a significantly longer time until a decision for adjuvant therapy (p<0.01). Application of the latest classifier version v12.3 led to a re-classification of 9 (42.9 %) cases, of which 5 cases (55.6 %) had an improved calibrated score. CONCLUSION: Our study presents unclassifiable cases and the possible clinical impact when waiting for the accurate diagnosis in these challenging cases. Even though DNA methylation profiling significantly contributes to advanced CNS tumor diagnostics, clinicians should be aware of a prolonged interval to treatment initiation, especially for highly malignant brain tumors. Therefore, we would recommend to schedule adjuvant treatment as early as possible, if surgical and histological results are suspicious for this disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9164687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91646872022-06-05 PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients Drexler, Richard Eckhardt, Alicia Bode, Helena Lamszus, Katrin Westphal, Manfred Schüller, Ulrich Mohme, Malte Neuro Oncol Pathology/Classification OBJECTIVE: The molecular classification of CNS tumors has revolutionized our understanding of the biological heterogeneity and diversity of tumor subtypes. DNA methylation-based classification allows to discriminate subtypes. Although DNA methylation-based classification can diagnose tumors with high specificity, there are tumors which cannot be classified. We aimed to gain further insight into these challenging cases. METHODS: Overall, 21 patients with a CNS tumor that was non-classifiable (confidence score <0.3), or had a low confidence score (<0.9) using the DNA methylation-based classifier version 11b4, were included. Tumors were re-classified using version (v12.3), and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 21 pediatric and adolescent brain tumors with a calibrated score below 0.9 in the classifier output were identified. Of these, 11 patients (52.4 %) were assigned to the “no matching methylation class” with a score below 0.3. IDH-wild type glioblastoma (23.8 %), ETMR (14.3 %), and DMG (14.3 %) were the most common histological diagnoses. Surgical and clinicopathological features as well as DNA input and tumor purity did not influence the confidence score. Cases with non-classifiable tumors had a significantly longer time until a decision for adjuvant therapy (p<0.01). Application of the latest classifier version v12.3 led to a re-classification of 9 (42.9 %) cases, of which 5 cases (55.6 %) had an improved calibrated score. CONCLUSION: Our study presents unclassifiable cases and the possible clinical impact when waiting for the accurate diagnosis in these challenging cases. Even though DNA methylation profiling significantly contributes to advanced CNS tumor diagnostics, clinicians should be aware of a prolonged interval to treatment initiation, especially for highly malignant brain tumors. Therefore, we would recommend to schedule adjuvant treatment as early as possible, if surgical and histological results are suspicious for this disease. Oxford University Press 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9164687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.589 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Pathology/Classification Drexler, Richard Eckhardt, Alicia Bode, Helena Lamszus, Katrin Westphal, Manfred Schüller, Ulrich Mohme, Malte PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients |
title | PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients |
title_full | PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients |
title_fullStr | PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients |
title_full_unstemmed | PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients |
title_short | PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients |
title_sort | path-05 challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide dna methylation analysis for cns neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients |
topic | Pathology/Classification |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.589 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drexlerrichard path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients AT eckhardtalicia path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients AT bodehelena path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients AT lamszuskatrin path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients AT westphalmanfred path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients AT schullerulrich path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients AT mohmemalte path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients |