Cargando…

PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients

OBJECTIVE: The molecular classification of CNS tumors has revolutionized our understanding of the biological heterogeneity and diversity of tumor subtypes. DNA methylation-based classification allows to discriminate subtypes. Although DNA methylation-based classification can diagnose tumors with hig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drexler, Richard, Eckhardt, Alicia, Bode, Helena, Lamszus, Katrin, Westphal, Manfred, Schüller, Ulrich, Mohme, Malte
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164687/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.589
_version_ 1784720194437906432
author Drexler, Richard
Eckhardt, Alicia
Bode, Helena
Lamszus, Katrin
Westphal, Manfred
Schüller, Ulrich
Mohme, Malte
author_facet Drexler, Richard
Eckhardt, Alicia
Bode, Helena
Lamszus, Katrin
Westphal, Manfred
Schüller, Ulrich
Mohme, Malte
author_sort Drexler, Richard
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The molecular classification of CNS tumors has revolutionized our understanding of the biological heterogeneity and diversity of tumor subtypes. DNA methylation-based classification allows to discriminate subtypes. Although DNA methylation-based classification can diagnose tumors with high specificity, there are tumors which cannot be classified. We aimed to gain further insight into these challenging cases. METHODS: Overall, 21 patients with a CNS tumor that was non-classifiable (confidence score <0.3), or had a low confidence score (<0.9) using the DNA methylation-based classifier version 11b4, were included. Tumors were re-classified using version (v12.3), and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 21 pediatric and adolescent brain tumors with a calibrated score below 0.9 in the classifier output were identified. Of these, 11 patients (52.4 %) were assigned to the “no matching methylation class” with a score below 0.3. IDH-wild type glioblastoma (23.8 %), ETMR (14.3 %), and DMG (14.3 %) were the most common histological diagnoses. Surgical and clinicopathological features as well as DNA input and tumor purity did not influence the confidence score. Cases with non-classifiable tumors had a significantly longer time until a decision for adjuvant therapy (p<0.01). Application of the latest classifier version v12.3 led to a re-classification of 9 (42.9 %) cases, of which 5 cases (55.6 %) had an improved calibrated score. CONCLUSION: Our study presents unclassifiable cases and the possible clinical impact when waiting for the accurate diagnosis in these challenging cases. Even though DNA methylation profiling significantly contributes to advanced CNS tumor diagnostics, clinicians should be aware of a prolonged interval to treatment initiation, especially for highly malignant brain tumors. Therefore, we would recommend to schedule adjuvant treatment as early as possible, if surgical and histological results are suspicious for this disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9164687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91646872022-06-05 PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients Drexler, Richard Eckhardt, Alicia Bode, Helena Lamszus, Katrin Westphal, Manfred Schüller, Ulrich Mohme, Malte Neuro Oncol Pathology/Classification OBJECTIVE: The molecular classification of CNS tumors has revolutionized our understanding of the biological heterogeneity and diversity of tumor subtypes. DNA methylation-based classification allows to discriminate subtypes. Although DNA methylation-based classification can diagnose tumors with high specificity, there are tumors which cannot be classified. We aimed to gain further insight into these challenging cases. METHODS: Overall, 21 patients with a CNS tumor that was non-classifiable (confidence score <0.3), or had a low confidence score (<0.9) using the DNA methylation-based classifier version 11b4, were included. Tumors were re-classified using version (v12.3), and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 21 pediatric and adolescent brain tumors with a calibrated score below 0.9 in the classifier output were identified. Of these, 11 patients (52.4 %) were assigned to the “no matching methylation class” with a score below 0.3. IDH-wild type glioblastoma (23.8 %), ETMR (14.3 %), and DMG (14.3 %) were the most common histological diagnoses. Surgical and clinicopathological features as well as DNA input and tumor purity did not influence the confidence score. Cases with non-classifiable tumors had a significantly longer time until a decision for adjuvant therapy (p<0.01). Application of the latest classifier version v12.3 led to a re-classification of 9 (42.9 %) cases, of which 5 cases (55.6 %) had an improved calibrated score. CONCLUSION: Our study presents unclassifiable cases and the possible clinical impact when waiting for the accurate diagnosis in these challenging cases. Even though DNA methylation profiling significantly contributes to advanced CNS tumor diagnostics, clinicians should be aware of a prolonged interval to treatment initiation, especially for highly malignant brain tumors. Therefore, we would recommend to schedule adjuvant treatment as early as possible, if surgical and histological results are suspicious for this disease. Oxford University Press 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9164687/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.589 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Pathology/Classification
Drexler, Richard
Eckhardt, Alicia
Bode, Helena
Lamszus, Katrin
Westphal, Manfred
Schüller, Ulrich
Mohme, Malte
PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients
title PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients
title_full PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients
title_fullStr PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients
title_full_unstemmed PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients
title_short PATH-05 Challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide DNA methylation analysis for CNS neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients
title_sort path-05 challenge and clinical relevance of a non-matching classifier output in genome-wide dna methylation analysis for cns neoplasms in pediatric and adolescent patients
topic Pathology/Classification
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164687/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.589
work_keys_str_mv AT drexlerrichard path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients
AT eckhardtalicia path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients
AT bodehelena path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients
AT lamszuskatrin path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients
AT westphalmanfred path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients
AT schullerulrich path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients
AT mohmemalte path05challengeandclinicalrelevanceofanonmatchingclassifieroutputingenomewidednamethylationanalysisforcnsneoplasmsinpediatricandadolescentpatients