Cargando…
MEDB-17. Re-irradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma in a matched cohort: Advantageous especially in patients without resection
INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is an important part of initial treatment for medulloblastoma in most children. Radiotherapy after recurrence is currently not widely used. This analysis aims to evaluate whether re-irradiation (RT2) may show survival benefits. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165040/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.392 |
_version_ | 1784720291400777728 |
---|---|
author | Adolph, Jonas E Tippelt, Stephan Tschirner, Sebastian Gaab, Christine Mikasch, Ruth Mynarek, Martin Rutkowski, Stefan Warmuth-Metz, Monika Bison, Brigitte Pfister, Stefan M Witt, Olaf Pietsch, Torsten Kortmann, Rolf-Dieter Dietzsch, Stefan Timmermann, Beate Fleischhack, Gudrun |
author_facet | Adolph, Jonas E Tippelt, Stephan Tschirner, Sebastian Gaab, Christine Mikasch, Ruth Mynarek, Martin Rutkowski, Stefan Warmuth-Metz, Monika Bison, Brigitte Pfister, Stefan M Witt, Olaf Pietsch, Torsten Kortmann, Rolf-Dieter Dietzsch, Stefan Timmermann, Beate Fleischhack, Gudrun |
author_sort | Adolph, Jonas E |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is an important part of initial treatment for medulloblastoma in most children. Radiotherapy after recurrence is currently not widely used. This analysis aims to evaluate whether re-irradiation (RT2) may show survival benefits. METHODS: Data for patients with recurrent medulloblastomas from the German HIT-REZ studies was gathered. Patients with RT2 at 1st recurrence were matched by propensity score to an equal number of patients without radiotherapy. Matching variables were sex, initial therapy, time to recurrence, metastatic stage and therapy at 1st recurrence and radiotherapy at subsequent recurrences. The matched cohort was analysed regarding PFS and OS after 1st recurrence. RESULTS: From a cohort of 240 pre-irradiated patients, 106 patients were matched. Patients with RT2 showed improved median PFS [21.0 months (95%-CI: 17.5 – 27.6)] and OS [37.5 months (CI: 30.0 – 59.4)] compared to control patients [(PFS: 12.0 months (CI: 8.1 – 17.7) / OS: 20.1 months (CI: 14.5 – 44.8)]. When stratifying by resection at recurrence (36.8% resected), a survival advantage for RT2 was found in patients without resection in PFS [19.6 (CI: 14.9 – 31.5) vs. 8.0 months (CI: 5.4 – 14.4)] and OS [41.9 (CI: 30.0 – 59.4) vs. 13.3 months (CI: 8.1 – 36.7)]. However, no advantage was found after resection [PFS: 22.5 (CI: 17.5 – 50.4) vs. 19.1 months (CI: 14.1 – 34.3) / OS: 32.3 (CI: 27.6 – NA) vs. 48 months (CI: 23.4 – NA)]. CSI was used in 6 patients without differences in survival to focal RT2. Median PFS after first irradiation was 32.5 months, after RT2 20.9 months. No patients with RT2 were alive past 10 years after 1st recurrence.CONCLUSION: Patients with recurrent medulloblastoma show benefits from RT2 in median PFS and OS. However, no advantage for RT2 was found when resection was also applied at recurrence. Cure after treatment with RT2 was not found in our cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9165040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91650402022-06-05 MEDB-17. Re-irradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma in a matched cohort: Advantageous especially in patients without resection Adolph, Jonas E Tippelt, Stephan Tschirner, Sebastian Gaab, Christine Mikasch, Ruth Mynarek, Martin Rutkowski, Stefan Warmuth-Metz, Monika Bison, Brigitte Pfister, Stefan M Witt, Olaf Pietsch, Torsten Kortmann, Rolf-Dieter Dietzsch, Stefan Timmermann, Beate Fleischhack, Gudrun Neuro Oncol Medulloblastoma INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is an important part of initial treatment for medulloblastoma in most children. Radiotherapy after recurrence is currently not widely used. This analysis aims to evaluate whether re-irradiation (RT2) may show survival benefits. METHODS: Data for patients with recurrent medulloblastomas from the German HIT-REZ studies was gathered. Patients with RT2 at 1st recurrence were matched by propensity score to an equal number of patients without radiotherapy. Matching variables were sex, initial therapy, time to recurrence, metastatic stage and therapy at 1st recurrence and radiotherapy at subsequent recurrences. The matched cohort was analysed regarding PFS and OS after 1st recurrence. RESULTS: From a cohort of 240 pre-irradiated patients, 106 patients were matched. Patients with RT2 showed improved median PFS [21.0 months (95%-CI: 17.5 – 27.6)] and OS [37.5 months (CI: 30.0 – 59.4)] compared to control patients [(PFS: 12.0 months (CI: 8.1 – 17.7) / OS: 20.1 months (CI: 14.5 – 44.8)]. When stratifying by resection at recurrence (36.8% resected), a survival advantage for RT2 was found in patients without resection in PFS [19.6 (CI: 14.9 – 31.5) vs. 8.0 months (CI: 5.4 – 14.4)] and OS [41.9 (CI: 30.0 – 59.4) vs. 13.3 months (CI: 8.1 – 36.7)]. However, no advantage was found after resection [PFS: 22.5 (CI: 17.5 – 50.4) vs. 19.1 months (CI: 14.1 – 34.3) / OS: 32.3 (CI: 27.6 – NA) vs. 48 months (CI: 23.4 – NA)]. CSI was used in 6 patients without differences in survival to focal RT2. Median PFS after first irradiation was 32.5 months, after RT2 20.9 months. No patients with RT2 were alive past 10 years after 1st recurrence.CONCLUSION: Patients with recurrent medulloblastoma show benefits from RT2 in median PFS and OS. However, no advantage for RT2 was found when resection was also applied at recurrence. Cure after treatment with RT2 was not found in our cohort. Oxford University Press 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9165040/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.392 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Medulloblastoma Adolph, Jonas E Tippelt, Stephan Tschirner, Sebastian Gaab, Christine Mikasch, Ruth Mynarek, Martin Rutkowski, Stefan Warmuth-Metz, Monika Bison, Brigitte Pfister, Stefan M Witt, Olaf Pietsch, Torsten Kortmann, Rolf-Dieter Dietzsch, Stefan Timmermann, Beate Fleischhack, Gudrun MEDB-17. Re-irradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma in a matched cohort: Advantageous especially in patients without resection |
title | MEDB-17. Re-irradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma in a matched cohort: Advantageous especially in patients without resection |
title_full | MEDB-17. Re-irradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma in a matched cohort: Advantageous especially in patients without resection |
title_fullStr | MEDB-17. Re-irradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma in a matched cohort: Advantageous especially in patients without resection |
title_full_unstemmed | MEDB-17. Re-irradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma in a matched cohort: Advantageous especially in patients without resection |
title_short | MEDB-17. Re-irradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma in a matched cohort: Advantageous especially in patients without resection |
title_sort | medb-17. re-irradiation for recurrent medulloblastoma in a matched cohort: advantageous especially in patients without resection |
topic | Medulloblastoma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165040/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adolphjonase medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT tippeltstephan medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT tschirnersebastian medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT gaabchristine medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT mikaschruth medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT mynarekmartin medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT rutkowskistefan medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT warmuthmetzmonika medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT bisonbrigitte medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT pfisterstefanm medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT wittolaf medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT pietschtorsten medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT kortmannrolfdieter medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT dietzschstefan medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT timmermannbeate medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection AT fleischhackgudrun medb17reirradiationforrecurrentmedulloblastomainamatchedcohortadvantageousespeciallyinpatientswithoutresection |