Cargando…
MEDB-36. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity withinMYC andMYCN amplified medulloblastoma
MYC and MYCN are the most commonly amplified oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Their overall association with a poor prognosis has supported their adoption as high-risk disease biomarkers in trials. However, emerging evidence suggests that certain patients with MYN/MYCN focally-amplified tumours can ach...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165081/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.410 |
_version_ | 1784720302648852480 |
---|---|
author | Schwalbe, Edward Lindsey, Janet Hill, Rebecca Crosier, Stephen Ryan, Sarra Williamson, Daniel Kool, Marcel Milde, Till Pfister, Stefan Bailey, Simon Clifford, Steven |
author_facet | Schwalbe, Edward Lindsey, Janet Hill, Rebecca Crosier, Stephen Ryan, Sarra Williamson, Daniel Kool, Marcel Milde, Till Pfister, Stefan Bailey, Simon Clifford, Steven |
author_sort | Schwalbe, Edward |
collection | PubMed |
description | MYC and MYCN are the most commonly amplified oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Their overall association with a poor prognosis has supported their adoption as high-risk disease biomarkers in trials. However, emerging evidence suggests that certain patients with MYN/MYCN focally-amplified tumours can achieve long-term survival and therefore may suffer unnecessary late-effects associated with intensified therapies. To investigate this heterogeneity, we characterised the molecular and clinico-pathological features of curated cohorts of MYC (n=64) and MYCN (n=95) amplified tumours, drawn from >1000 diagnostic cases, and assessed their associations with disease outcome. Within the MYCN-amplified cohort, survival was related to molecular group; patients with MYCN(Grp3) or MYCN(Grp4) tumours with no other clinico-pathological risk factors (subtotal resection (STR), metastatic disease, LCA pathology) were intermediate-risk (n=25;70% 5-year PFS). In contrast, a very-high-risk group was defined by positivity for MYCN(SHH), STR and/or LCA (n=64;32% 5-year PFS). 22/35 assessable MYCN(SHH) harboured TP53 mutations; 9/12 with data were germline. MYC(Grp3) represented the majority (46/58; 79%) of molecularly-grouped MYC-amplified tumours. Importantly, while radiotherapy receipt conferred a modest survival advantage, for MYC-amplified tumours with additional clinico-molecular risk factors (LCA, metastasis, STR, Grp3), survival was dismal, irrespective of radiotherapy receipt. A very-high-risk group of MYC-amplified tumours was identified (n=51;10% 5-year PFS), defined by positivity for ≥1 additional risk factors (STR, LCA and/or metastasis). Alternatively, membership of subgroups II/V defined a smaller, very-high-risk patient group (n=28;7% 5-year PFS). Long-term survival was seen in the majority of remaining MYC-amplified tumours negative for these specified features (61% 5-year PFS; high-risk). MYC and MYCN-amplified medulloblastomas are biologically heterogeneous with diverse clinical outcomes. Molecular subgroup assignment and established clinical features are critical for their improved stratification. Patient subgroups identified may be eligible for therapy de-escalation; in contrast, the very-high-risk patient groups are incurable using current therapies and urgently require novel experimental treatment strategies upfront. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9165081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91650812022-06-05 MEDB-36. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity withinMYC andMYCN amplified medulloblastoma Schwalbe, Edward Lindsey, Janet Hill, Rebecca Crosier, Stephen Ryan, Sarra Williamson, Daniel Kool, Marcel Milde, Till Pfister, Stefan Bailey, Simon Clifford, Steven Neuro Oncol Medulloblastoma MYC and MYCN are the most commonly amplified oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Their overall association with a poor prognosis has supported their adoption as high-risk disease biomarkers in trials. However, emerging evidence suggests that certain patients with MYN/MYCN focally-amplified tumours can achieve long-term survival and therefore may suffer unnecessary late-effects associated with intensified therapies. To investigate this heterogeneity, we characterised the molecular and clinico-pathological features of curated cohorts of MYC (n=64) and MYCN (n=95) amplified tumours, drawn from >1000 diagnostic cases, and assessed their associations with disease outcome. Within the MYCN-amplified cohort, survival was related to molecular group; patients with MYCN(Grp3) or MYCN(Grp4) tumours with no other clinico-pathological risk factors (subtotal resection (STR), metastatic disease, LCA pathology) were intermediate-risk (n=25;70% 5-year PFS). In contrast, a very-high-risk group was defined by positivity for MYCN(SHH), STR and/or LCA (n=64;32% 5-year PFS). 22/35 assessable MYCN(SHH) harboured TP53 mutations; 9/12 with data were germline. MYC(Grp3) represented the majority (46/58; 79%) of molecularly-grouped MYC-amplified tumours. Importantly, while radiotherapy receipt conferred a modest survival advantage, for MYC-amplified tumours with additional clinico-molecular risk factors (LCA, metastasis, STR, Grp3), survival was dismal, irrespective of radiotherapy receipt. A very-high-risk group of MYC-amplified tumours was identified (n=51;10% 5-year PFS), defined by positivity for ≥1 additional risk factors (STR, LCA and/or metastasis). Alternatively, membership of subgroups II/V defined a smaller, very-high-risk patient group (n=28;7% 5-year PFS). Long-term survival was seen in the majority of remaining MYC-amplified tumours negative for these specified features (61% 5-year PFS; high-risk). MYC and MYCN-amplified medulloblastomas are biologically heterogeneous with diverse clinical outcomes. Molecular subgroup assignment and established clinical features are critical for their improved stratification. Patient subgroups identified may be eligible for therapy de-escalation; in contrast, the very-high-risk patient groups are incurable using current therapies and urgently require novel experimental treatment strategies upfront. Oxford University Press 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9165081/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.410 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Medulloblastoma Schwalbe, Edward Lindsey, Janet Hill, Rebecca Crosier, Stephen Ryan, Sarra Williamson, Daniel Kool, Marcel Milde, Till Pfister, Stefan Bailey, Simon Clifford, Steven MEDB-36. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity withinMYC andMYCN amplified medulloblastoma |
title | MEDB-36. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity withinMYC andMYCN amplified medulloblastoma |
title_full | MEDB-36. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity withinMYC andMYCN amplified medulloblastoma |
title_fullStr | MEDB-36. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity withinMYC andMYCN amplified medulloblastoma |
title_full_unstemmed | MEDB-36. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity withinMYC andMYCN amplified medulloblastoma |
title_short | MEDB-36. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity withinMYC andMYCN amplified medulloblastoma |
title_sort | medb-36. clinical and molecular heterogeneity withinmyc andmycn amplified medulloblastoma |
topic | Medulloblastoma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165081/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.410 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwalbeedward medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT lindseyjanet medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT hillrebecca medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT crosierstephen medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT ryansarra medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT williamsondaniel medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT koolmarcel medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT mildetill medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT pfisterstefan medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT baileysimon medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma AT cliffordsteven medb36clinicalandmolecularheterogeneitywithinmycandmycnamplifiedmedulloblastoma |