Cargando…

OTHR-14. Responding to the COVID Challenge: evaluating a new method of adverse event recording in response to remote working.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-COV2 pandemic had huge impact on how clinical research is conducted when clinical research coordinators (CRC) transitioned to working remotely. An urgent transition of paper documentation into electronic formats had to occur without compromising participant safety or data integr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reiners, Stephanie, Barnwell, Alison, Murray, Lisa, Abdelbaki, Mohamed, Jones, Sally, Lluka, Brunilda, Roemerman, Heather
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165122/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.553
_version_ 1784720313202769920
author Reiners, Stephanie
Barnwell, Alison
Murray, Lisa
Abdelbaki, Mohamed
Jones, Sally
Lluka, Brunilda
Roemerman, Heather
author_facet Reiners, Stephanie
Barnwell, Alison
Murray, Lisa
Abdelbaki, Mohamed
Jones, Sally
Lluka, Brunilda
Roemerman, Heather
author_sort Reiners, Stephanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The SARS-COV2 pandemic had huge impact on how clinical research is conducted when clinical research coordinators (CRC) transitioned to working remotely. An urgent transition of paper documentation into electronic formats had to occur without compromising participant safety or data integrity. Adverse event (AE) reporting had previously been captured in various paper formats with wet signature. AEs, attribution, severity, and clinical significance had to be changed into being electronically captured and incorporated into the medical record that captures the events in real time. METHOD: We assessed the satisfaction of the new method of AE recording amongst pediatric hematology oncology physicians and staff in a large academic institution during the COVID pandemic through a REDCap survey. The survey assessed the time, effort, perceived efficacy and overall acceptability of the paper-based and electronic methods of AE documentation. RESULTS: Seventy-one staff members were surveyed. Fifty (65%) responded, including 6 participants who were not involved in the AE reporting process and did not complete the survey. Of the remaining 44 participants, 43 (98%) preferred an electronic documentation method. Secondary results and further analysis will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID pandemic has changed how CRC report AEs and electronic documentation seems to be the preferred method of documentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9165122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91651222022-06-05 OTHR-14. Responding to the COVID Challenge: evaluating a new method of adverse event recording in response to remote working. Reiners, Stephanie Barnwell, Alison Murray, Lisa Abdelbaki, Mohamed Jones, Sally Lluka, Brunilda Roemerman, Heather Neuro Oncol Others (Not Fitting Any Other Category) BACKGROUND: The SARS-COV2 pandemic had huge impact on how clinical research is conducted when clinical research coordinators (CRC) transitioned to working remotely. An urgent transition of paper documentation into electronic formats had to occur without compromising participant safety or data integrity. Adverse event (AE) reporting had previously been captured in various paper formats with wet signature. AEs, attribution, severity, and clinical significance had to be changed into being electronically captured and incorporated into the medical record that captures the events in real time. METHOD: We assessed the satisfaction of the new method of AE recording amongst pediatric hematology oncology physicians and staff in a large academic institution during the COVID pandemic through a REDCap survey. The survey assessed the time, effort, perceived efficacy and overall acceptability of the paper-based and electronic methods of AE documentation. RESULTS: Seventy-one staff members were surveyed. Fifty (65%) responded, including 6 participants who were not involved in the AE reporting process and did not complete the survey. Of the remaining 44 participants, 43 (98%) preferred an electronic documentation method. Secondary results and further analysis will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID pandemic has changed how CRC report AEs and electronic documentation seems to be the preferred method of documentation. Oxford University Press 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9165122/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.553 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Others (Not Fitting Any Other Category)
Reiners, Stephanie
Barnwell, Alison
Murray, Lisa
Abdelbaki, Mohamed
Jones, Sally
Lluka, Brunilda
Roemerman, Heather
OTHR-14. Responding to the COVID Challenge: evaluating a new method of adverse event recording in response to remote working.
title OTHR-14. Responding to the COVID Challenge: evaluating a new method of adverse event recording in response to remote working.
title_full OTHR-14. Responding to the COVID Challenge: evaluating a new method of adverse event recording in response to remote working.
title_fullStr OTHR-14. Responding to the COVID Challenge: evaluating a new method of adverse event recording in response to remote working.
title_full_unstemmed OTHR-14. Responding to the COVID Challenge: evaluating a new method of adverse event recording in response to remote working.
title_short OTHR-14. Responding to the COVID Challenge: evaluating a new method of adverse event recording in response to remote working.
title_sort othr-14. responding to the covid challenge: evaluating a new method of adverse event recording in response to remote working.
topic Others (Not Fitting Any Other Category)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165122/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.553
work_keys_str_mv AT reinersstephanie othr14respondingtothecovidchallengeevaluatinganewmethodofadverseeventrecordinginresponsetoremoteworking
AT barnwellalison othr14respondingtothecovidchallengeevaluatinganewmethodofadverseeventrecordinginresponsetoremoteworking
AT murraylisa othr14respondingtothecovidchallengeevaluatinganewmethodofadverseeventrecordinginresponsetoremoteworking
AT abdelbakimohamed othr14respondingtothecovidchallengeevaluatinganewmethodofadverseeventrecordinginresponsetoremoteworking
AT jonessally othr14respondingtothecovidchallengeevaluatinganewmethodofadverseeventrecordinginresponsetoremoteworking
AT llukabrunilda othr14respondingtothecovidchallengeevaluatinganewmethodofadverseeventrecordinginresponsetoremoteworking
AT roemermanheather othr14respondingtothecovidchallengeevaluatinganewmethodofadverseeventrecordinginresponsetoremoteworking