Cargando…
Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits
PURPOSE: To determine the sensorimotor and clinical function of patients with confirmed successful outcome after either undergoing acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization, Bankart repair (BR), or rotator cuff repair (RC), and to compare these measures to the contralateral, healthy side without h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34741625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06751-0 |
_version_ | 1784720349564239872 |
---|---|
author | Ehmann, Yannick J. Berthold, Daniel P. Reuter, Sven Beitzel, Knut Köhler, Robin Stöcker, Fabian Muench, Lukas N. Pogorzelski, Jonas Rupp, Marco-Christopher Braun, Sepp Imhoff, Andreas B. Buchmann, Stefan |
author_facet | Ehmann, Yannick J. Berthold, Daniel P. Reuter, Sven Beitzel, Knut Köhler, Robin Stöcker, Fabian Muench, Lukas N. Pogorzelski, Jonas Rupp, Marco-Christopher Braun, Sepp Imhoff, Andreas B. Buchmann, Stefan |
author_sort | Ehmann, Yannick J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the sensorimotor and clinical function of patients with confirmed successful outcome after either undergoing acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization, Bankart repair (BR), or rotator cuff repair (RC), and to compare these measures to the contralateral, healthy side without history of previous injuries or surgeries of the upper extremity. It was hypothesized that patients of each interventional group would have inferior sensorimotor function of the shoulder joint compared to the contralateral, healthy side, while presenting with successful clinical and functional outcomes. METHODS: Three intervention groups including ten patients who had confirmed successful clinical and functional outcomes after either undergoing ACJ stabilization, BR, or RC were evaluated postoperatively at an average follow-up of 31.7 ± 11.6 months. Additionally, a healthy control group (CG) of ten patients was included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Constant–Murley (CM) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Sensorimotor function was assessed by determining the center of pressure (COP) of the shoulder joint in a one-handed support task in supine position on a validated pressure plate. RESULTS: Each interventional group demonstrated excellent clinical outcome scores including the CM Score (ACJ 83.3 ± 11.8; BR 89.0 ± 10.3; RC 81.4 ± 8.8), ASES Score (ACJ 95.5 ± 7.0; BR 92.5 ± 9.6; RC 96.5 ± 5.2), and VAS (ACJ 0.5 ± 0.9; BR 0.5 ± 0.8; RC 0.5 ± 0.8). Overall, the CG showed no significant side-to-side difference in COP, whereas the ACJ-group and the BR-group demonstrated significantly increased COP compared to the healthy side (ACJ 103 cm vs. 98 cm, p = 0.049; BR: 116 cm vs. 102 cm, p = 0.006). The RC-group revealed no significant side-to-side difference (120 cm vs. 108 cm, n.s.). CONCLUSION: Centre of pressure measurement detected sensorimotor functional deficits following surgical treatment of the shoulder joint in patients with confirmed successful clinical and functional outcomes. This may indicate that specific postoperative training and rehabilitation protocols should be established for patients who underwent surgery of the upper extremity. These results underline that sensorimotor training should be an important component of postoperative rehabilitation and physiotherapeutic activities to improve postoperative function and joint control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9165257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91652572022-06-05 Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits Ehmann, Yannick J. Berthold, Daniel P. Reuter, Sven Beitzel, Knut Köhler, Robin Stöcker, Fabian Muench, Lukas N. Pogorzelski, Jonas Rupp, Marco-Christopher Braun, Sepp Imhoff, Andreas B. Buchmann, Stefan Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Shoulder PURPOSE: To determine the sensorimotor and clinical function of patients with confirmed successful outcome after either undergoing acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization, Bankart repair (BR), or rotator cuff repair (RC), and to compare these measures to the contralateral, healthy side without history of previous injuries or surgeries of the upper extremity. It was hypothesized that patients of each interventional group would have inferior sensorimotor function of the shoulder joint compared to the contralateral, healthy side, while presenting with successful clinical and functional outcomes. METHODS: Three intervention groups including ten patients who had confirmed successful clinical and functional outcomes after either undergoing ACJ stabilization, BR, or RC were evaluated postoperatively at an average follow-up of 31.7 ± 11.6 months. Additionally, a healthy control group (CG) of ten patients was included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Constant–Murley (CM) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Sensorimotor function was assessed by determining the center of pressure (COP) of the shoulder joint in a one-handed support task in supine position on a validated pressure plate. RESULTS: Each interventional group demonstrated excellent clinical outcome scores including the CM Score (ACJ 83.3 ± 11.8; BR 89.0 ± 10.3; RC 81.4 ± 8.8), ASES Score (ACJ 95.5 ± 7.0; BR 92.5 ± 9.6; RC 96.5 ± 5.2), and VAS (ACJ 0.5 ± 0.9; BR 0.5 ± 0.8; RC 0.5 ± 0.8). Overall, the CG showed no significant side-to-side difference in COP, whereas the ACJ-group and the BR-group demonstrated significantly increased COP compared to the healthy side (ACJ 103 cm vs. 98 cm, p = 0.049; BR: 116 cm vs. 102 cm, p = 0.006). The RC-group revealed no significant side-to-side difference (120 cm vs. 108 cm, n.s.). CONCLUSION: Centre of pressure measurement detected sensorimotor functional deficits following surgical treatment of the shoulder joint in patients with confirmed successful clinical and functional outcomes. This may indicate that specific postoperative training and rehabilitation protocols should be established for patients who underwent surgery of the upper extremity. These results underline that sensorimotor training should be an important component of postoperative rehabilitation and physiotherapeutic activities to improve postoperative function and joint control. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9165257/ /pubmed/34741625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06751-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Shoulder Ehmann, Yannick J. Berthold, Daniel P. Reuter, Sven Beitzel, Knut Köhler, Robin Stöcker, Fabian Muench, Lukas N. Pogorzelski, Jonas Rupp, Marco-Christopher Braun, Sepp Imhoff, Andreas B. Buchmann, Stefan Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits |
title | Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits |
title_full | Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits |
title_fullStr | Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits |
title_full_unstemmed | Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits |
title_short | Center of pressure (COP) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits |
title_sort | center of pressure (cop) measurement in patients with confirmed successful outcomes following shoulder surgery show significant sensorimotor deficits |
topic | Shoulder |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34741625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06751-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ehmannyannickj centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT bertholddanielp centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT reutersven centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT beitzelknut centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT kohlerrobin centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT stockerfabian centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT muenchlukasn centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT pogorzelskijonas centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT ruppmarcochristopher centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT braunsepp centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT imhoffandreasb centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits AT buchmannstefan centerofpressurecopmeasurementinpatientswithconfirmedsuccessfuloutcomesfollowingshouldersurgeryshowsignificantsensorimotordeficits |