Cargando…

Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution

There is substantial evidence that women tend to support different policies and political candidates than men. Many studies also document gender differences in a variety of important preference dimensions, such as risk-taking, competition and pro-sociality. However, the degree to which differential...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ranehill, Eva, Weber, Roberto A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35673601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8
_version_ 1784720352452018176
author Ranehill, Eva
Weber, Roberto A.
author_facet Ranehill, Eva
Weber, Roberto A.
author_sort Ranehill, Eva
collection PubMed
description There is substantial evidence that women tend to support different policies and political candidates than men. Many studies also document gender differences in a variety of important preference dimensions, such as risk-taking, competition and pro-sociality. However, the degree to which differential voting by men and women is related to these gaps in more basic preferences requires an improved understanding. We conduct an experiment in which individuals in small laboratory “societies” repeatedly vote for redistribution policies and engage in production. We find that women vote for more egalitarian redistribution and that this difference persists with experience and in environments with varying degrees of risk. This gender voting gap is accounted for partly by both gender gaps in preferences and by expectations regarding economic circumstances. However, including both these controls in a regression analysis indicates that the latter is the primary driving force. We also observe policy differences between male- and female-controlled groups, though these are substantially smaller than the mean individual differences—a natural consequence of the aggregation of individual preferences into collective outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9165268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91652682022-06-05 Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution Ranehill, Eva Weber, Roberto A. Exp Econ Original Paper There is substantial evidence that women tend to support different policies and political candidates than men. Many studies also document gender differences in a variety of important preference dimensions, such as risk-taking, competition and pro-sociality. However, the degree to which differential voting by men and women is related to these gaps in more basic preferences requires an improved understanding. We conduct an experiment in which individuals in small laboratory “societies” repeatedly vote for redistribution policies and engage in production. We find that women vote for more egalitarian redistribution and that this difference persists with experience and in environments with varying degrees of risk. This gender voting gap is accounted for partly by both gender gaps in preferences and by expectations regarding economic circumstances. However, including both these controls in a regression analysis indicates that the latter is the primary driving force. We also observe policy differences between male- and female-controlled groups, though these are substantially smaller than the mean individual differences—a natural consequence of the aggregation of individual preferences into collective outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8. Springer US 2022-01-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9165268/ /pubmed/35673601 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Ranehill, Eva
Weber, Roberto A.
Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution
title Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution
title_full Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution
title_fullStr Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution
title_full_unstemmed Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution
title_short Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution
title_sort gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35673601
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10683-021-09741-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ranehilleva genderpreferencegapsandvotingforredistribution
AT weberrobertoa genderpreferencegapsandvotingforredistribution