Cargando…
Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks
Synaptic polarity, that is, whether synapses are inhibitory (−) or excitatory (+), is challenging to map, despite being a key to understand brain function. Here, synaptic polarity is inferred computationally considering three experimental scenarios, depending on the nature of available input data, u...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202104906 |
_version_ | 1784720410291470336 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Michael R. Wytock, Thomas P. Kovács, István A. |
author_facet | Harris, Michael R. Wytock, Thomas P. Kovács, István A. |
author_sort | Harris, Michael R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Synaptic polarity, that is, whether synapses are inhibitory (−) or excitatory (+), is challenging to map, despite being a key to understand brain function. Here, synaptic polarity is inferred computationally considering three experimental scenarios, depending on the nature of available input data, using the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome as an example. First, the inputs consist of detailed neurotransmitter (NT) and receptor (R) gene expression, integrated through the connectome model (CM). The CM formulates the problem through a wiring rule network that summarizes how NT‐R pairs govern synaptic polarity, and resolves 356 synaptic polarities in addition to the 1752 known polarities. Second, known synaptic polarities are considered as an input, in addition to the NT and R gene expression data, but without wiring rules. These data train the spatial connectome model, which infers the polarity of 81% of the CM‐resolved connections at [Formula: see text] % precision, while also inferring 147 of the remaining unknown polarities. Last, without known expression or wiring rules, polarities are inferred through a network sign prediction problem. As an illustration of high performance in this case, the generalized CM is introduced. These results address imminent challenges in unveiling large‐scale synaptic polarities, an essential step toward more realistic brain models. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9165506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91655062022-06-04 Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks Harris, Michael R. Wytock, Thomas P. Kovács, István A. Adv Sci (Weinh) Research Articles Synaptic polarity, that is, whether synapses are inhibitory (−) or excitatory (+), is challenging to map, despite being a key to understand brain function. Here, synaptic polarity is inferred computationally considering three experimental scenarios, depending on the nature of available input data, using the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome as an example. First, the inputs consist of detailed neurotransmitter (NT) and receptor (R) gene expression, integrated through the connectome model (CM). The CM formulates the problem through a wiring rule network that summarizes how NT‐R pairs govern synaptic polarity, and resolves 356 synaptic polarities in addition to the 1752 known polarities. Second, known synaptic polarities are considered as an input, in addition to the NT and R gene expression data, but without wiring rules. These data train the spatial connectome model, which infers the polarity of 81% of the CM‐resolved connections at [Formula: see text] % precision, while also inferring 147 of the remaining unknown polarities. Last, without known expression or wiring rules, polarities are inferred through a network sign prediction problem. As an illustration of high performance in this case, the generalized CM is introduced. These results address imminent challenges in unveiling large‐scale synaptic polarities, an essential step toward more realistic brain models. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9165506/ /pubmed/35355451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202104906 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Harris, Michael R. Wytock, Thomas P. Kovács, István A. Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks |
title | Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks |
title_full | Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks |
title_fullStr | Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks |
title_full_unstemmed | Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks |
title_short | Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks |
title_sort | computational inference of synaptic polarities in neuronal networks |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202104906 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrismichaelr computationalinferenceofsynapticpolaritiesinneuronalnetworks AT wytockthomasp computationalinferenceofsynapticpolaritiesinneuronalnetworks AT kovacsistvana computationalinferenceofsynapticpolaritiesinneuronalnetworks |