Cargando…

Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks

Synaptic polarity, that is, whether synapses are inhibitory (−) or excitatory (+), is challenging to map, despite being a key to understand brain function. Here, synaptic polarity is inferred computationally considering three experimental scenarios, depending on the nature of available input data, u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Michael R., Wytock, Thomas P., Kovács, István A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202104906
_version_ 1784720410291470336
author Harris, Michael R.
Wytock, Thomas P.
Kovács, István A.
author_facet Harris, Michael R.
Wytock, Thomas P.
Kovács, István A.
author_sort Harris, Michael R.
collection PubMed
description Synaptic polarity, that is, whether synapses are inhibitory (−) or excitatory (+), is challenging to map, despite being a key to understand brain function. Here, synaptic polarity is inferred computationally considering three experimental scenarios, depending on the nature of available input data, using the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome as an example. First, the inputs consist of detailed neurotransmitter (NT) and receptor (R) gene expression, integrated through the connectome model (CM). The CM formulates the problem through a wiring rule network that summarizes how NT‐R pairs govern synaptic polarity, and resolves 356 synaptic polarities in addition to the 1752 known polarities. Second, known synaptic polarities are considered as an input, in addition to the NT and R gene expression data, but without wiring rules. These data train the spatial connectome model, which infers the polarity of 81% of the CM‐resolved connections at [Formula: see text] % precision, while also inferring 147 of the remaining unknown polarities. Last, without known expression or wiring rules, polarities are inferred through a network sign prediction problem. As an illustration of high performance in this case, the generalized CM is introduced. These results address imminent challenges in unveiling large‐scale synaptic polarities, an essential step toward more realistic brain models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9165506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91655062022-06-04 Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks Harris, Michael R. Wytock, Thomas P. Kovács, István A. Adv Sci (Weinh) Research Articles Synaptic polarity, that is, whether synapses are inhibitory (−) or excitatory (+), is challenging to map, despite being a key to understand brain function. Here, synaptic polarity is inferred computationally considering three experimental scenarios, depending on the nature of available input data, using the Caenorhabditis elegans connectome as an example. First, the inputs consist of detailed neurotransmitter (NT) and receptor (R) gene expression, integrated through the connectome model (CM). The CM formulates the problem through a wiring rule network that summarizes how NT‐R pairs govern synaptic polarity, and resolves 356 synaptic polarities in addition to the 1752 known polarities. Second, known synaptic polarities are considered as an input, in addition to the NT and R gene expression data, but without wiring rules. These data train the spatial connectome model, which infers the polarity of 81% of the CM‐resolved connections at [Formula: see text] % precision, while also inferring 147 of the remaining unknown polarities. Last, without known expression or wiring rules, polarities are inferred through a network sign prediction problem. As an illustration of high performance in this case, the generalized CM is introduced. These results address imminent challenges in unveiling large‐scale synaptic polarities, an essential step toward more realistic brain models. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9165506/ /pubmed/35355451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202104906 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Advanced Science published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Harris, Michael R.
Wytock, Thomas P.
Kovács, István A.
Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks
title Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks
title_full Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks
title_fullStr Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks
title_full_unstemmed Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks
title_short Computational Inference of Synaptic Polarities in Neuronal Networks
title_sort computational inference of synaptic polarities in neuronal networks
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35355451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/advs.202104906
work_keys_str_mv AT harrismichaelr computationalinferenceofsynapticpolaritiesinneuronalnetworks
AT wytockthomasp computationalinferenceofsynapticpolaritiesinneuronalnetworks
AT kovacsistvana computationalinferenceofsynapticpolaritiesinneuronalnetworks