Cargando…

The Inclusion of Patients’ Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: Patient centred care is needed now more than ever in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Trials, policy makers, and service providers have most often used treatment retention and opioid urine screens as measures of treatment effectiveness. However, patients receiving medication for o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanger, Nitika, Panesar, Balpreet, Dennis, Michael, Rosic, Tea, Rodrigues, Myanca, Lovell, Elizabeth, Yang, Shuling, Butt, Mehreen, Thabane, Lehana, Samaan, Zainab
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669100
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S297699
_version_ 1784720446141235200
author Sanger, Nitika
Panesar, Balpreet
Dennis, Michael
Rosic, Tea
Rodrigues, Myanca
Lovell, Elizabeth
Yang, Shuling
Butt, Mehreen
Thabane, Lehana
Samaan, Zainab
author_facet Sanger, Nitika
Panesar, Balpreet
Dennis, Michael
Rosic, Tea
Rodrigues, Myanca
Lovell, Elizabeth
Yang, Shuling
Butt, Mehreen
Thabane, Lehana
Samaan, Zainab
author_sort Sanger, Nitika
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Patient centred care is needed now more than ever in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Trials, policy makers, and service providers have most often used treatment retention and opioid urine screens as measures of treatment effectiveness. However, patients receiving medication for opioid use disorder treatment (MOUD) may prioritise the use of different ways to assess treatment success. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to synthesize literature examining the self-reported goals patients would like to achieve in MOUD for opioid use disorder. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry, the National Institutes for Health Clinical Trials Registry, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception until April 30th, 2021. No restrictions were placed on language, age, or type of MOUD. A qualitative synthesis is presented given that a meta-analysis was not possible. RESULTS: The search yielded a total of 21,082 records from which 8 met criteria for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis. We identified a total of 43 patient-reported treatment goals from the 8 studies. Twelve domains were created from the 43 goals reported. These domains cover a range of important areas for patients’ goals related to living a normal life, physical health, mental health, treatment, and substance use specific areas. CONCLUSION: This review highlights several patient goals that they would like to achieve during treatment for opioid use disorder that are not commonly considered as markers of treatment effectiveness. Goals related to health, living a normal life, and overall substance use concerns by patients should be taken into consideration by clinical trialists, researchers, policy makers, service providers, patients, and communities engaged in developing and tailoring treatment plans for opioid use disorder. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018095553.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9165704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91657042022-06-05 The Inclusion of Patients’ Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review Sanger, Nitika Panesar, Balpreet Dennis, Michael Rosic, Tea Rodrigues, Myanca Lovell, Elizabeth Yang, Shuling Butt, Mehreen Thabane, Lehana Samaan, Zainab Patient Relat Outcome Meas Review INTRODUCTION: Patient centred care is needed now more than ever in the treatment of opioid use disorder. Trials, policy makers, and service providers have most often used treatment retention and opioid urine screens as measures of treatment effectiveness. However, patients receiving medication for opioid use disorder treatment (MOUD) may prioritise the use of different ways to assess treatment success. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to synthesize literature examining the self-reported goals patients would like to achieve in MOUD for opioid use disorder. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry, the National Institutes for Health Clinical Trials Registry, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception until April 30th, 2021. No restrictions were placed on language, age, or type of MOUD. A qualitative synthesis is presented given that a meta-analysis was not possible. RESULTS: The search yielded a total of 21,082 records from which 8 met criteria for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis. We identified a total of 43 patient-reported treatment goals from the 8 studies. Twelve domains were created from the 43 goals reported. These domains cover a range of important areas for patients’ goals related to living a normal life, physical health, mental health, treatment, and substance use specific areas. CONCLUSION: This review highlights several patient goals that they would like to achieve during treatment for opioid use disorder that are not commonly considered as markers of treatment effectiveness. Goals related to health, living a normal life, and overall substance use concerns by patients should be taken into consideration by clinical trialists, researchers, policy makers, service providers, patients, and communities engaged in developing and tailoring treatment plans for opioid use disorder. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018095553. Dove 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9165704/ /pubmed/35669100 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S297699 Text en © 2022 Sanger et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
Sanger, Nitika
Panesar, Balpreet
Dennis, Michael
Rosic, Tea
Rodrigues, Myanca
Lovell, Elizabeth
Yang, Shuling
Butt, Mehreen
Thabane, Lehana
Samaan, Zainab
The Inclusion of Patients’ Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review
title The Inclusion of Patients’ Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review
title_full The Inclusion of Patients’ Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Inclusion of Patients’ Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Inclusion of Patients’ Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review
title_short The Inclusion of Patients’ Reported Outcomes to Inform Treatment Effectiveness Measures in Opioid Use Disorder. A Systematic Review
title_sort inclusion of patients’ reported outcomes to inform treatment effectiveness measures in opioid use disorder. a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9165704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669100
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S297699
work_keys_str_mv AT sangernitika theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT panesarbalpreet theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT dennismichael theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT rosictea theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT rodriguesmyanca theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT lovellelizabeth theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT yangshuling theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT buttmehreen theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT thabanelehana theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT samaanzainab theinclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT sangernitika inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT panesarbalpreet inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT dennismichael inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT rosictea inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT rodriguesmyanca inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT lovellelizabeth inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT yangshuling inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT buttmehreen inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT thabanelehana inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview
AT samaanzainab inclusionofpatientsreportedoutcomestoinformtreatmenteffectivenessmeasuresinopioidusedisorderasystematicreview