Cargando…
Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle
BACKGROUND: Plate fixation is the treatment of choice for a midshaft clavicle non-union. Those non-unions that require >1 surgical procedure to heal are termed recalcitrant non-union. Regardless of the number of previously failed procedures, our surgical strategy is aimed at achieving an optimal...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734038 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1544 |
_version_ | 1784720566444359680 |
---|---|
author | Grewal, Simran Baltes, Thomas PA Wiegerinck, Esther Kloen, Peter |
author_facet | Grewal, Simran Baltes, Thomas PA Wiegerinck, Esther Kloen, Peter |
author_sort | Grewal, Simran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Plate fixation is the treatment of choice for a midshaft clavicle non-union. Those non-unions that require >1 surgical procedure to heal are termed recalcitrant non-union. Regardless of the number of previously failed procedures, our surgical strategy is aimed at achieving an optimal mechanical and biological environment to facilitate healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 14 patients with a recalcitrant clavicle non-union treated with open reduction and plate fixation combined with graft augmentation when indicated. Healing rates after index surgery were analysed. All patients were observed for at least 12 months. RESULTS: All patients healed at a mean time of 193.2 days (range 90–390). Five of the 14 patients had at least one positive surprise culture, for which they received antibiotic treatment. At the latest follow-up, no patient reported pain or discomfort. Mean disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score was 16.3 points (range 0–40), indicating only mild residual impairment. A possible link was found between the time between injury and definitive surgery and the time to healing [Pearson correlation 0.527, sig. (two-tailed) 0.000]. CONCLUSION: This study shows 100% bone healing and good functional outcomes after surgical revision for a recalcitrant clavicle non-union. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Grewal S, Baltes TPA, Wiegerinck E, et al. Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(1):1–6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9166258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91662582022-06-21 Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle Grewal, Simran Baltes, Thomas PA Wiegerinck, Esther Kloen, Peter Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Original Article BACKGROUND: Plate fixation is the treatment of choice for a midshaft clavicle non-union. Those non-unions that require >1 surgical procedure to heal are termed recalcitrant non-union. Regardless of the number of previously failed procedures, our surgical strategy is aimed at achieving an optimal mechanical and biological environment to facilitate healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 14 patients with a recalcitrant clavicle non-union treated with open reduction and plate fixation combined with graft augmentation when indicated. Healing rates after index surgery were analysed. All patients were observed for at least 12 months. RESULTS: All patients healed at a mean time of 193.2 days (range 90–390). Five of the 14 patients had at least one positive surprise culture, for which they received antibiotic treatment. At the latest follow-up, no patient reported pain or discomfort. Mean disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score was 16.3 points (range 0–40), indicating only mild residual impairment. A possible link was found between the time between injury and definitive surgery and the time to healing [Pearson correlation 0.527, sig. (two-tailed) 0.000]. CONCLUSION: This study shows 100% bone healing and good functional outcomes after surgical revision for a recalcitrant clavicle non-union. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Grewal S, Baltes TPA, Wiegerinck E, et al. Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(1):1–6. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9166258/ /pubmed/35734038 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1544 Text en Copyright © 2022; The Author(s). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-share alike license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as original. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Grewal, Simran Baltes, Thomas PA Wiegerinck, Esther Kloen, Peter Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle |
title | Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle |
title_full | Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle |
title_fullStr | Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle |
title_short | Treatment of a Recalcitrant Non-union of the Clavicle |
title_sort | treatment of a recalcitrant non-union of the clavicle |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734038 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grewalsimran treatmentofarecalcitrantnonunionoftheclavicle AT baltesthomaspa treatmentofarecalcitrantnonunionoftheclavicle AT wiegerinckesther treatmentofarecalcitrantnonunionoftheclavicle AT kloenpeter treatmentofarecalcitrantnonunionoftheclavicle |