Cargando…

Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation medicine is facing a new development phase thanks to a recent wave of rigorous clinical trials aimed at improving the scientific evidence of protocols. This phenomenon, combined with new trends in personalised medical therapies, is expected to change clinical practice dram...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campagnini, Silvia, Arienti, Chiara, Patrini, Michele, Liuzzi, Piergiuseppe, Mannini, Andrea, Carrozza, Maria Chiara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01032-4
_version_ 1784720590614036480
author Campagnini, Silvia
Arienti, Chiara
Patrini, Michele
Liuzzi, Piergiuseppe
Mannini, Andrea
Carrozza, Maria Chiara
author_facet Campagnini, Silvia
Arienti, Chiara
Patrini, Michele
Liuzzi, Piergiuseppe
Mannini, Andrea
Carrozza, Maria Chiara
author_sort Campagnini, Silvia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation medicine is facing a new development phase thanks to a recent wave of rigorous clinical trials aimed at improving the scientific evidence of protocols. This phenomenon, combined with new trends in personalised medical therapies, is expected to change clinical practice dramatically. The emerging field of Rehabilomics is only possible if methodologies are based on biomedical data collection and analysis. In this framework, the objective of this work is to develop a systematic review of machine learning algorithms as solutions to predict motor functional recovery of post-stroke patients after treatment. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of five electronic databases using the Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) format. We extracted health conditions, population characteristics, outcome assessed, the method for feature extraction and selection, the algorithm used, and the validation approach. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). A qualitative description of the characteristics of the included studies as well as a narrative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 19 primary studies were included. The predictors most frequently used belonged to the areas of demographic characteristics and stroke assessment through clinical examination. Regarding the methods, linear and logistic regressions were the most frequently used and cross-validation was the preferred validation approach. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several methodological limitations: small sample sizes, a limited number of external validation approaches, and high heterogeneity among input and output variables. Although these elements prevented a quantitative comparison across models, we defined the most frequently used models given a specific outcome, providing useful indications for the application of more complex machine learning algorithms in rehabilitation medicine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-022-01032-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9166382
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91663822022-06-05 Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review Campagnini, Silvia Arienti, Chiara Patrini, Michele Liuzzi, Piergiuseppe Mannini, Andrea Carrozza, Maria Chiara J Neuroeng Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation medicine is facing a new development phase thanks to a recent wave of rigorous clinical trials aimed at improving the scientific evidence of protocols. This phenomenon, combined with new trends in personalised medical therapies, is expected to change clinical practice dramatically. The emerging field of Rehabilomics is only possible if methodologies are based on biomedical data collection and analysis. In this framework, the objective of this work is to develop a systematic review of machine learning algorithms as solutions to predict motor functional recovery of post-stroke patients after treatment. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of five electronic databases using the Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) format. We extracted health conditions, population characteristics, outcome assessed, the method for feature extraction and selection, the algorithm used, and the validation approach. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). A qualitative description of the characteristics of the included studies as well as a narrative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 19 primary studies were included. The predictors most frequently used belonged to the areas of demographic characteristics and stroke assessment through clinical examination. Regarding the methods, linear and logistic regressions were the most frequently used and cross-validation was the preferred validation approach. CONCLUSIONS: We identified several methodological limitations: small sample sizes, a limited number of external validation approaches, and high heterogeneity among input and output variables. Although these elements prevented a quantitative comparison across models, we defined the most frequently used models given a specific outcome, providing useful indications for the application of more complex machine learning algorithms in rehabilitation medicine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-022-01032-4. BioMed Central 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9166382/ /pubmed/35659246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01032-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Campagnini, Silvia
Arienti, Chiara
Patrini, Michele
Liuzzi, Piergiuseppe
Mannini, Andrea
Carrozza, Maria Chiara
Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
title Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_full Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_fullStr Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_short Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
title_sort machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01032-4
work_keys_str_mv AT campagninisilvia machinelearningmethodsforfunctionalrecoverypredictionandprognosisinpoststrokerehabilitationasystematicreview
AT arientichiara machinelearningmethodsforfunctionalrecoverypredictionandprognosisinpoststrokerehabilitationasystematicreview
AT patrinimichele machinelearningmethodsforfunctionalrecoverypredictionandprognosisinpoststrokerehabilitationasystematicreview
AT liuzzipiergiuseppe machinelearningmethodsforfunctionalrecoverypredictionandprognosisinpoststrokerehabilitationasystematicreview
AT manniniandrea machinelearningmethodsforfunctionalrecoverypredictionandprognosisinpoststrokerehabilitationasystematicreview
AT carrozzamariachiara machinelearningmethodsforfunctionalrecoverypredictionandprognosisinpoststrokerehabilitationasystematicreview