Cargando…

Digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?

QUESTION: Most adolescents live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and about 10% of them face mental problems. The mental health provision gap in low- and middle-income countries could be addressed by evidence-based practices, however costs are implementational barriers. Digitalization can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cottin, Marianne, Blum, Kathrin, Konjufca, Jon, Quevedo, Yamil, Kaaya, Sylvia, Behn, Alex, Schmeck, Klaus, Sharp, Carla, Zimmermann, Ronan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04023-w
_version_ 1784720621809172480
author Cottin, Marianne
Blum, Kathrin
Konjufca, Jon
Quevedo, Yamil
Kaaya, Sylvia
Behn, Alex
Schmeck, Klaus
Sharp, Carla
Zimmermann, Ronan
author_facet Cottin, Marianne
Blum, Kathrin
Konjufca, Jon
Quevedo, Yamil
Kaaya, Sylvia
Behn, Alex
Schmeck, Klaus
Sharp, Carla
Zimmermann, Ronan
author_sort Cottin, Marianne
collection PubMed
description QUESTION: Most adolescents live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and about 10% of them face mental problems. The mental health provision gap in low- and middle-income countries could be addressed by evidence-based practices, however costs are implementational barriers. Digitalization can improve the accessibility of these tools and constitutes a chance for LMIC to use them more easily at a low cost. We reviewed free and brief evidence-based mental health assessment tools available for digital use to assess psychopathology across different domains in youth. METHODS: For the current study, instruments from a recent review on paper-based instruments were re-used. Additionally, a systematic search was conducted to add instruments for the personality disorder domain. We searched and classified the copyright and license terms available from the internet in terms of free usage and deliverability in a digital format. In the case that this information was insufficient, we contacted the authors. RESULTS: In total, we evaluated 109 instruments. Of these instruments, 53 were free and digitally usable covering 11 mental health domains. However, retrieving information on copyright and license terms was very difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Free and digitally adaptable instruments are available, supporting the strategy of using instruments digitally to increase access. The instrument’s authors support this initiative, however, the lack of copyright information and the difficulties in contacting the authors and licence holders are barriers to using this strategy in LMIC. A comprehensive, online instrument repository for clinical practice would be an appropriate next step to make the instruments more accessible and reduce implementation barriers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04023-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9166519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91665192022-06-05 Digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format? Cottin, Marianne Blum, Kathrin Konjufca, Jon Quevedo, Yamil Kaaya, Sylvia Behn, Alex Schmeck, Klaus Sharp, Carla Zimmermann, Ronan BMC Psychiatry Research QUESTION: Most adolescents live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and about 10% of them face mental problems. The mental health provision gap in low- and middle-income countries could be addressed by evidence-based practices, however costs are implementational barriers. Digitalization can improve the accessibility of these tools and constitutes a chance for LMIC to use them more easily at a low cost. We reviewed free and brief evidence-based mental health assessment tools available for digital use to assess psychopathology across different domains in youth. METHODS: For the current study, instruments from a recent review on paper-based instruments were re-used. Additionally, a systematic search was conducted to add instruments for the personality disorder domain. We searched and classified the copyright and license terms available from the internet in terms of free usage and deliverability in a digital format. In the case that this information was insufficient, we contacted the authors. RESULTS: In total, we evaluated 109 instruments. Of these instruments, 53 were free and digitally usable covering 11 mental health domains. However, retrieving information on copyright and license terms was very difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Free and digitally adaptable instruments are available, supporting the strategy of using instruments digitally to increase access. The instrument’s authors support this initiative, however, the lack of copyright information and the difficulties in contacting the authors and licence holders are barriers to using this strategy in LMIC. A comprehensive, online instrument repository for clinical practice would be an appropriate next step to make the instruments more accessible and reduce implementation barriers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-04023-w. BioMed Central 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9166519/ /pubmed/35659275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04023-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Cottin, Marianne
Blum, Kathrin
Konjufca, Jon
Quevedo, Yamil
Kaaya, Sylvia
Behn, Alex
Schmeck, Klaus
Sharp, Carla
Zimmermann, Ronan
Digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?
title Digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?
title_full Digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?
title_fullStr Digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?
title_full_unstemmed Digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?
title_short Digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?
title_sort digital use of standardised assessment tools for children and adolescents: can available paper-based questionnaires be used free of charge in electronic format?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04023-w
work_keys_str_mv AT cottinmarianne digitaluseofstandardisedassessmenttoolsforchildrenandadolescentscanavailablepaperbasedquestionnairesbeusedfreeofchargeinelectronicformat
AT blumkathrin digitaluseofstandardisedassessmenttoolsforchildrenandadolescentscanavailablepaperbasedquestionnairesbeusedfreeofchargeinelectronicformat
AT konjufcajon digitaluseofstandardisedassessmenttoolsforchildrenandadolescentscanavailablepaperbasedquestionnairesbeusedfreeofchargeinelectronicformat
AT quevedoyamil digitaluseofstandardisedassessmenttoolsforchildrenandadolescentscanavailablepaperbasedquestionnairesbeusedfreeofchargeinelectronicformat
AT kaayasylvia digitaluseofstandardisedassessmenttoolsforchildrenandadolescentscanavailablepaperbasedquestionnairesbeusedfreeofchargeinelectronicformat
AT behnalex digitaluseofstandardisedassessmenttoolsforchildrenandadolescentscanavailablepaperbasedquestionnairesbeusedfreeofchargeinelectronicformat
AT schmeckklaus digitaluseofstandardisedassessmenttoolsforchildrenandadolescentscanavailablepaperbasedquestionnairesbeusedfreeofchargeinelectronicformat
AT sharpcarla digitaluseofstandardisedassessmenttoolsforchildrenandadolescentscanavailablepaperbasedquestionnairesbeusedfreeofchargeinelectronicformat
AT zimmermannronan digitaluseofstandardisedassessmenttoolsforchildrenandadolescentscanavailablepaperbasedquestionnairesbeusedfreeofchargeinelectronicformat