Cargando…

Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan

BACKGROUND: Afghanistan’s health system is unique in that primary healthcare is delivered by non-governmental organizations funded by multilateral or bilateral donors, not the government. Given the wide range of implementers providing the basic package of health services, there may be performance di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farewar, Farhad, Saeed, Khwaja Mir Ahad, Foshanji, Abo Ismael, Alawi, Said Mohammad Karim, Zawoli, Mohammad Yonus, Irit, Sinai, Zeng, Wu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00357-0
_version_ 1784720650947002368
author Farewar, Farhad
Saeed, Khwaja Mir Ahad
Foshanji, Abo Ismael
Alawi, Said Mohammad Karim
Zawoli, Mohammad Yonus
Irit, Sinai
Zeng, Wu
author_facet Farewar, Farhad
Saeed, Khwaja Mir Ahad
Foshanji, Abo Ismael
Alawi, Said Mohammad Karim
Zawoli, Mohammad Yonus
Irit, Sinai
Zeng, Wu
author_sort Farewar, Farhad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Afghanistan’s health system is unique in that primary healthcare is delivered by non-governmental organizations funded by multilateral or bilateral donors, not the government. Given the wide range of implementers providing the basic package of health services, there may be performance differences in service delivery. This study assessed the relative technical efficiency of different levels of primary healthcare services and explored its determinants. METHOD: Data envelopment analysis was used to assess the relative technical efficiency of three levels of primary healthcare facilities (comprehensive, basic, and sub-health centers). The inputs included personnel and capital expenditure, while the outputs were measured by the number of facility visits. Data on inputs and outputs were obtained from national health information databases for 1263 healthcare facilities in 31 provinces. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the correlation of various elements with efficiency scores. Regression models were used to identify potential factors associated with efficiency scores at the health facility level. RESULTS: The average efficiency score of health facilities was 0.74 when pooling all 1,263 health facilities, with 102 health facilities (8.1%) having efficiency scores of 1 (100% efficient). The lowest quintile of health facilities had an average efficiency score of 0.36, while the highest quintile had a score of 0.96. On average, efficiency scores of comprehensive health centers were higher than basic and sub-health centers by 0.11 and .07, respectively. In addition, the difference between efficiency scores of facilities in the highest and lowest quintiles was highest in facilities that offer fewer services. Thus, they have the largest room for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that public health facilities in Afghanistan that provide more comprehensive primary health services use their resources more efficiently and that smaller facilities have more room for improvement. A more integrated delivery model would help improve the efficiency of providing primary healthcare in Afghanistan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9166646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91666462022-06-05 Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan Farewar, Farhad Saeed, Khwaja Mir Ahad Foshanji, Abo Ismael Alawi, Said Mohammad Karim Zawoli, Mohammad Yonus Irit, Sinai Zeng, Wu Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Afghanistan’s health system is unique in that primary healthcare is delivered by non-governmental organizations funded by multilateral or bilateral donors, not the government. Given the wide range of implementers providing the basic package of health services, there may be performance differences in service delivery. This study assessed the relative technical efficiency of different levels of primary healthcare services and explored its determinants. METHOD: Data envelopment analysis was used to assess the relative technical efficiency of three levels of primary healthcare facilities (comprehensive, basic, and sub-health centers). The inputs included personnel and capital expenditure, while the outputs were measured by the number of facility visits. Data on inputs and outputs were obtained from national health information databases for 1263 healthcare facilities in 31 provinces. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess the correlation of various elements with efficiency scores. Regression models were used to identify potential factors associated with efficiency scores at the health facility level. RESULTS: The average efficiency score of health facilities was 0.74 when pooling all 1,263 health facilities, with 102 health facilities (8.1%) having efficiency scores of 1 (100% efficient). The lowest quintile of health facilities had an average efficiency score of 0.36, while the highest quintile had a score of 0.96. On average, efficiency scores of comprehensive health centers were higher than basic and sub-health centers by 0.11 and .07, respectively. In addition, the difference between efficiency scores of facilities in the highest and lowest quintiles was highest in facilities that offer fewer services. Thus, they have the largest room for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that public health facilities in Afghanistan that provide more comprehensive primary health services use their resources more efficiently and that smaller facilities have more room for improvement. A more integrated delivery model would help improve the efficiency of providing primary healthcare in Afghanistan. BioMed Central 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9166646/ /pubmed/35659679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00357-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Farewar, Farhad
Saeed, Khwaja Mir Ahad
Foshanji, Abo Ismael
Alawi, Said Mohammad Karim
Zawoli, Mohammad Yonus
Irit, Sinai
Zeng, Wu
Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan
title Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan
title_full Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan
title_fullStr Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan
title_short Efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in Afghanistan
title_sort efficiency analysis of primary healthcare facilities in afghanistan
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-022-00357-0
work_keys_str_mv AT farewarfarhad efficiencyanalysisofprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinafghanistan
AT saeedkhwajamirahad efficiencyanalysisofprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinafghanistan
AT foshanjiaboismael efficiencyanalysisofprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinafghanistan
AT alawisaidmohammadkarim efficiencyanalysisofprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinafghanistan
AT zawolimohammadyonus efficiencyanalysisofprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinafghanistan
AT iritsinai efficiencyanalysisofprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinafghanistan
AT zengwu efficiencyanalysisofprimaryhealthcarefacilitiesinafghanistan