Cargando…
Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma
Multiple approaches with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE, a somatostatin analog PET radiotracer, have demonstrated clinical utility in evaluation of meningioma but have not been compared directly. Our purpose was to compare diagnostic performance of different approaches to quantitative brain [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13467-9 |
_version_ | 1784720684000215040 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Sean H. Roytman, Michelle Madera, Gabriela Magge, Rajiv S. Liechty, Benjamin Ramakrishna, Rohan Pannullo, Susan C. Schwartz, Theodore H. Karakatsanis, Nicolas A. Osborne, Joseph R. Lin, Eaton Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Ivanidze, Jana |
author_facet | Kim, Sean H. Roytman, Michelle Madera, Gabriela Magge, Rajiv S. Liechty, Benjamin Ramakrishna, Rohan Pannullo, Susan C. Schwartz, Theodore H. Karakatsanis, Nicolas A. Osborne, Joseph R. Lin, Eaton Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Ivanidze, Jana |
author_sort | Kim, Sean H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiple approaches with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE, a somatostatin analog PET radiotracer, have demonstrated clinical utility in evaluation of meningioma but have not been compared directly. Our purpose was to compare diagnostic performance of different approaches to quantitative brain [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with suspected meningioma recurrence and to establish the optimal diagnostic threshold for each method. Patients with suspected meningioma were imaged prospectively with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE brain PET/MRI. Lesions were classified as meningiomas and post-treatment change (PTC), using follow-up pathology and MRI as reference standard. Lesions were reclassified using the following methods: absolute maximum SUV threshold (SUV), SUV ratio (SUVR) to superior sagittal sinus (SSS) (SUVRsss), SUVR to the pituitary gland (SUVRpit), and SUVR to the normal brain parenchyma (SUVRnorm). Diagnostic performance of the four methods was compared using contingency tables and McNemar’s test. Previously published pre-determined thresholds were assessed where applicable. The optimal thresholds for each method were identified using Youden’s J statistics. 166 meningiomas and 41 PTC lesions were identified across 62 patients. SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm of meningioma were significantly higher than those of PTC (P < 0.0001). The optimal thresholds for SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm were 4.7, 3.2, 0.3, and 62.6, respectively. At the optimal thresholds, SUV had the highest specificity (97.6%) and SUVRsss had the highest sensitivity (86.1%). An ROC analysis of SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm revealed AUC of 0.932, 0.910, 0.915, and 0.800, respectively (P < 0.0001). Developing a diagnostic threshold is key to wider clinical translation of [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma evaluation. We found that the SUVRsss method may have the most robust combination of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of meningioma in the post-treatment setting, with the optimal threshold of 3.2. Future studies validating our findings in different patient populations are needed to continue optimizing the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04081701. Registered 9 September 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04081701. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9166786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91667862022-06-05 Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma Kim, Sean H. Roytman, Michelle Madera, Gabriela Magge, Rajiv S. Liechty, Benjamin Ramakrishna, Rohan Pannullo, Susan C. Schwartz, Theodore H. Karakatsanis, Nicolas A. Osborne, Joseph R. Lin, Eaton Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Ivanidze, Jana Sci Rep Article Multiple approaches with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE, a somatostatin analog PET radiotracer, have demonstrated clinical utility in evaluation of meningioma but have not been compared directly. Our purpose was to compare diagnostic performance of different approaches to quantitative brain [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with suspected meningioma recurrence and to establish the optimal diagnostic threshold for each method. Patients with suspected meningioma were imaged prospectively with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE brain PET/MRI. Lesions were classified as meningiomas and post-treatment change (PTC), using follow-up pathology and MRI as reference standard. Lesions were reclassified using the following methods: absolute maximum SUV threshold (SUV), SUV ratio (SUVR) to superior sagittal sinus (SSS) (SUVRsss), SUVR to the pituitary gland (SUVRpit), and SUVR to the normal brain parenchyma (SUVRnorm). Diagnostic performance of the four methods was compared using contingency tables and McNemar’s test. Previously published pre-determined thresholds were assessed where applicable. The optimal thresholds for each method were identified using Youden’s J statistics. 166 meningiomas and 41 PTC lesions were identified across 62 patients. SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm of meningioma were significantly higher than those of PTC (P < 0.0001). The optimal thresholds for SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm were 4.7, 3.2, 0.3, and 62.6, respectively. At the optimal thresholds, SUV had the highest specificity (97.6%) and SUVRsss had the highest sensitivity (86.1%). An ROC analysis of SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm revealed AUC of 0.932, 0.910, 0.915, and 0.800, respectively (P < 0.0001). Developing a diagnostic threshold is key to wider clinical translation of [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma evaluation. We found that the SUVRsss method may have the most robust combination of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of meningioma in the post-treatment setting, with the optimal threshold of 3.2. Future studies validating our findings in different patient populations are needed to continue optimizing the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04081701. Registered 9 September 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04081701. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9166786/ /pubmed/35661809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13467-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Kim, Sean H. Roytman, Michelle Madera, Gabriela Magge, Rajiv S. Liechty, Benjamin Ramakrishna, Rohan Pannullo, Susan C. Schwartz, Theodore H. Karakatsanis, Nicolas A. Osborne, Joseph R. Lin, Eaton Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Ivanidze, Jana Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma |
title | Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma |
title_full | Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma |
title_fullStr | Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma |
title_short | Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma |
title_sort | evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)ga]-dotatate pet/mri analysis in patients with meningioma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13467-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimseanh evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT roytmanmichelle evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT maderagabriela evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT maggerajivs evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT liechtybenjamin evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT ramakrishnarohan evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT pannullosusanc evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT schwartztheodoreh evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT karakatsanisnicolasa evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT osbornejosephr evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT lineaton evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT kniselyjonathanps evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma AT ivanidzejana evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma |