Cargando…

Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma

Multiple approaches with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE, a somatostatin analog PET radiotracer, have demonstrated clinical utility in evaluation of meningioma but have not been compared directly. Our purpose was to compare diagnostic performance of different approaches to quantitative brain [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sean H., Roytman, Michelle, Madera, Gabriela, Magge, Rajiv S., Liechty, Benjamin, Ramakrishna, Rohan, Pannullo, Susan C., Schwartz, Theodore H., Karakatsanis, Nicolas A., Osborne, Joseph R., Lin, Eaton, Knisely, Jonathan P. S., Ivanidze, Jana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13467-9
_version_ 1784720684000215040
author Kim, Sean H.
Roytman, Michelle
Madera, Gabriela
Magge, Rajiv S.
Liechty, Benjamin
Ramakrishna, Rohan
Pannullo, Susan C.
Schwartz, Theodore H.
Karakatsanis, Nicolas A.
Osborne, Joseph R.
Lin, Eaton
Knisely, Jonathan P. S.
Ivanidze, Jana
author_facet Kim, Sean H.
Roytman, Michelle
Madera, Gabriela
Magge, Rajiv S.
Liechty, Benjamin
Ramakrishna, Rohan
Pannullo, Susan C.
Schwartz, Theodore H.
Karakatsanis, Nicolas A.
Osborne, Joseph R.
Lin, Eaton
Knisely, Jonathan P. S.
Ivanidze, Jana
author_sort Kim, Sean H.
collection PubMed
description Multiple approaches with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE, a somatostatin analog PET radiotracer, have demonstrated clinical utility in evaluation of meningioma but have not been compared directly. Our purpose was to compare diagnostic performance of different approaches to quantitative brain [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with suspected meningioma recurrence and to establish the optimal diagnostic threshold for each method. Patients with suspected meningioma were imaged prospectively with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE brain PET/MRI. Lesions were classified as meningiomas and post-treatment change (PTC), using follow-up pathology and MRI as reference standard. Lesions were reclassified using the following methods: absolute maximum SUV threshold (SUV), SUV ratio (SUVR) to superior sagittal sinus (SSS) (SUVRsss), SUVR to the pituitary gland (SUVRpit), and SUVR to the normal brain parenchyma (SUVRnorm). Diagnostic performance of the four methods was compared using contingency tables and McNemar’s test. Previously published pre-determined thresholds were assessed where applicable. The optimal thresholds for each method were identified using Youden’s J statistics. 166 meningiomas and 41 PTC lesions were identified across 62 patients. SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm of meningioma were significantly higher than those of PTC (P < 0.0001). The optimal thresholds for SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm were 4.7, 3.2, 0.3, and 62.6, respectively. At the optimal thresholds, SUV had the highest specificity (97.6%) and SUVRsss had the highest sensitivity (86.1%). An ROC analysis of SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm revealed AUC of 0.932, 0.910, 0.915, and 0.800, respectively (P < 0.0001). Developing a diagnostic threshold is key to wider clinical translation of [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma evaluation. We found that the SUVRsss method may have the most robust combination of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of meningioma in the post-treatment setting, with the optimal threshold of 3.2. Future studies validating our findings in different patient populations are needed to continue optimizing the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04081701. Registered 9 September 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04081701.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9166786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91667862022-06-05 Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma Kim, Sean H. Roytman, Michelle Madera, Gabriela Magge, Rajiv S. Liechty, Benjamin Ramakrishna, Rohan Pannullo, Susan C. Schwartz, Theodore H. Karakatsanis, Nicolas A. Osborne, Joseph R. Lin, Eaton Knisely, Jonathan P. S. Ivanidze, Jana Sci Rep Article Multiple approaches with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE, a somatostatin analog PET radiotracer, have demonstrated clinical utility in evaluation of meningioma but have not been compared directly. Our purpose was to compare diagnostic performance of different approaches to quantitative brain [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with suspected meningioma recurrence and to establish the optimal diagnostic threshold for each method. Patients with suspected meningioma were imaged prospectively with [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE brain PET/MRI. Lesions were classified as meningiomas and post-treatment change (PTC), using follow-up pathology and MRI as reference standard. Lesions were reclassified using the following methods: absolute maximum SUV threshold (SUV), SUV ratio (SUVR) to superior sagittal sinus (SSS) (SUVRsss), SUVR to the pituitary gland (SUVRpit), and SUVR to the normal brain parenchyma (SUVRnorm). Diagnostic performance of the four methods was compared using contingency tables and McNemar’s test. Previously published pre-determined thresholds were assessed where applicable. The optimal thresholds for each method were identified using Youden’s J statistics. 166 meningiomas and 41 PTC lesions were identified across 62 patients. SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm of meningioma were significantly higher than those of PTC (P < 0.0001). The optimal thresholds for SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm were 4.7, 3.2, 0.3, and 62.6, respectively. At the optimal thresholds, SUV had the highest specificity (97.6%) and SUVRsss had the highest sensitivity (86.1%). An ROC analysis of SUV, SUVRsss, SUVRpit, and SUVRnorm revealed AUC of 0.932, 0.910, 0.915, and 0.800, respectively (P < 0.0001). Developing a diagnostic threshold is key to wider clinical translation of [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma evaluation. We found that the SUVRsss method may have the most robust combination of sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of meningioma in the post-treatment setting, with the optimal threshold of 3.2. Future studies validating our findings in different patient populations are needed to continue optimizing the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI in meningioma patients. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04081701. Registered 9 September 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04081701. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9166786/ /pubmed/35661809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13467-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Sean H.
Roytman, Michelle
Madera, Gabriela
Magge, Rajiv S.
Liechty, Benjamin
Ramakrishna, Rohan
Pannullo, Susan C.
Schwartz, Theodore H.
Karakatsanis, Nicolas A.
Osborne, Joseph R.
Lin, Eaton
Knisely, Jonathan P. S.
Ivanidze, Jana
Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma
title Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma
title_full Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma
title_fullStr Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma
title_short Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma
title_sort evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [(68)ga]-dotatate pet/mri analysis in patients with meningioma
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35661809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13467-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseanh evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT roytmanmichelle evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT maderagabriela evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT maggerajivs evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT liechtybenjamin evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT ramakrishnarohan evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT pannullosusanc evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT schwartztheodoreh evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT karakatsanisnicolasa evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT osbornejosephr evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT lineaton evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT kniselyjonathanps evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma
AT ivanidzejana evaluatingdiagnosticaccuracyanddeterminingoptimaldiagnosticthresholdsofdifferentapproachesto68gadotatatepetmrianalysisinpatientswithmeningioma