Cargando…
Empirical analyses and simulations showed that different machine and statistical learning methods had differing performance for predicting blood pressure
Machine learning is increasingly being used to predict clinical outcomes. Most comparisons of different methods have been based on empirical analyses in specific datasets. We used Monte Carlo simulations to determine when machine learning methods perform better than statistical learning methods in a...
Autores principales: | Austin, Peter C., Harrell, Frank E., Lee, Douglas S., Steyerberg, Ewout W. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166797/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35660759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13015-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Predictive performance of machine and statistical learning methods: Impact of data-generating processes on external validity in the “large N, small p” setting
por: Austin, Peter C, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Sex based subgroup differences in randomized controlled trials: empirical evidence from Cochrane meta-analyses
por: Wallach, Joshua D, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Predictive accuracy of risk factors and markers: a simulation study of the effect of novel markers on different performance measures for logistic regression models
por: Austin, Peter C, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Predictive accuracy of novel risk factors and markers: A simulation study of the sensitivity of different performance measures for the Cox proportional hazards regression model
por: Austin, Peter C, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Different perceptions of the burden of upper GI endoscopy: an empirical study in three patient groups
por: Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise, et al.
Publicado: (2007)