Cargando…
Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS(®)
BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System(®) (PROMIS(®)) was developed to reliably measure health-related quality of life using the patient’s voice. To achieve these aims, PROMIS utilized Item Response Theory methods in its development, validation and implementation. PR...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00464-9 |
_version_ | 1784720716581568512 |
---|---|
author | Chapman, Robert |
author_facet | Chapman, Robert |
author_sort | Chapman, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System(®) (PROMIS(®)) was developed to reliably measure health-related quality of life using the patient’s voice. To achieve these aims, PROMIS utilized Item Response Theory methods in its development, validation and implementation. PROMIS measures are typically scored using a specific method to calculate scores, called Expected A Posteriori estimation. BODY: Expected A Posteriori scoring methods are flexible, produce accurate scores and can be efficiently calculated by statistical software. This work seeks to make Expected A Posteriori scoring methods transparent and accessible to a larger audience through description, graphical demonstration and examples. Further applications and practical considerations of Expected A Posteriori scoring are presented and discussed. All materials used in this paper are made available through the R Markdown reproducibility framework and are intended to be reviewed and reused. Commented statistical code for the calculation of Expected A Posteriori scores is included. CONCLUSION: This work seeks to provide the reader with a summary and visualization of the operation of Expected A Posteriori scoring, as implemented in PROMIS. As PROMIS is increasingly adopted and implemented, this work will provide a basis for making psychometric methods more accessible to the PROMIS user base. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9166925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91669252022-06-05 Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS(®) Chapman, Robert J Patient Rep Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System(®) (PROMIS(®)) was developed to reliably measure health-related quality of life using the patient’s voice. To achieve these aims, PROMIS utilized Item Response Theory methods in its development, validation and implementation. PROMIS measures are typically scored using a specific method to calculate scores, called Expected A Posteriori estimation. BODY: Expected A Posteriori scoring methods are flexible, produce accurate scores and can be efficiently calculated by statistical software. This work seeks to make Expected A Posteriori scoring methods transparent and accessible to a larger audience through description, graphical demonstration and examples. Further applications and practical considerations of Expected A Posteriori scoring are presented and discussed. All materials used in this paper are made available through the R Markdown reproducibility framework and are intended to be reviewed and reused. Commented statistical code for the calculation of Expected A Posteriori scores is included. CONCLUSION: This work seeks to provide the reader with a summary and visualization of the operation of Expected A Posteriori scoring, as implemented in PROMIS. As PROMIS is increasingly adopted and implemented, this work will provide a basis for making psychometric methods more accessible to the PROMIS user base. Springer International Publishing 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9166925/ /pubmed/35657454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00464-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Chapman, Robert Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS(®) |
title | Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS(®) |
title_full | Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS(®) |
title_fullStr | Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS(®) |
title_full_unstemmed | Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS(®) |
title_short | Expected a posteriori scoring in PROMIS(®) |
title_sort | expected a posteriori scoring in promis(®) |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9166925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00464-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chapmanrobert expectedaposterioriscoringinpromis |