Cargando…

Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus

AIMS: Endothelial dysfunction is an early risk marker of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Timely screening is important in reducing cardiovascular disease-associated morbidity and mortality. This cross-sectional study investigates the acceptability and preferability of non-invasive cardi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lal, Anchal, Dave, Neha, Kazi, Samia, Mitchell, Paul, Thiagalingam, Aravinda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35673505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40200-022-00996-3
_version_ 1784720770257125376
author Lal, Anchal
Dave, Neha
Kazi, Samia
Mitchell, Paul
Thiagalingam, Aravinda
author_facet Lal, Anchal
Dave, Neha
Kazi, Samia
Mitchell, Paul
Thiagalingam, Aravinda
author_sort Lal, Anchal
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Endothelial dysfunction is an early risk marker of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Timely screening is important in reducing cardiovascular disease-associated morbidity and mortality. This cross-sectional study investigates the acceptability and preferability of non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures (EndoPAT2000 system and the ECG-gated fundoscope) in participants with diabetes mellitus compared to controls. METHODS: A self-administered Likert scale-based questionnaire was completed by 106 controls and 117 participants with diabetes mellitus, identified through stratified random sampling, upon conclusion of an Australian Heart Eye sub-study conducted at Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia from 2012 to 2014. Pearson’s χ(2) test, independent-samples t-test and regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Study participants who responded to the questionnaire had no preference for procedures (controls: 2.4 ± 1.1 vs diabetes mellitus: 2.5 ± 0.9, p = 0.38) but had an overall more negative experience with most aspects of the ECG-gated fundoscope than the EndoPAT2000 system. Of those with diabetes mellitus, participants who provided poorer self-rated health expressed discomfort with the mydriatic drops (ß 0.27, 95%CI 0.001 - 0.54, p = 0.049) and the fundoscope’s green light filter (ß 0.27, 95%CI 0.07 - 0.47, p = 0.009), as well as maintaining still (ß 0.40, 95%CI 0.08 - 0.72, p = 0.02) and not blinking (ß 0.38, 95%CI 0.07 - 0.70, p = 0.02) during photo acquisition. These participants were also less willing to repeat the ECG-gated fundoscope procedure (ß 0.29, 95%CI 0.07 - 0.52, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with diabetes mellitus, especially with poorer self-rated health, had a more negative experience with the ECG-gated fundoscope than the EndoPAT2000 system. Difficulties experienced under examination by the ECG-gated fundoscope appear related to the procedural design, which requires amendments improving patient comfort and compliance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9167168
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91671682022-06-06 Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus Lal, Anchal Dave, Neha Kazi, Samia Mitchell, Paul Thiagalingam, Aravinda J Diabetes Metab Disord Research Article AIMS: Endothelial dysfunction is an early risk marker of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Timely screening is important in reducing cardiovascular disease-associated morbidity and mortality. This cross-sectional study investigates the acceptability and preferability of non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures (EndoPAT2000 system and the ECG-gated fundoscope) in participants with diabetes mellitus compared to controls. METHODS: A self-administered Likert scale-based questionnaire was completed by 106 controls and 117 participants with diabetes mellitus, identified through stratified random sampling, upon conclusion of an Australian Heart Eye sub-study conducted at Westmead Hospital, NSW, Australia from 2012 to 2014. Pearson’s χ(2) test, independent-samples t-test and regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Study participants who responded to the questionnaire had no preference for procedures (controls: 2.4 ± 1.1 vs diabetes mellitus: 2.5 ± 0.9, p = 0.38) but had an overall more negative experience with most aspects of the ECG-gated fundoscope than the EndoPAT2000 system. Of those with diabetes mellitus, participants who provided poorer self-rated health expressed discomfort with the mydriatic drops (ß 0.27, 95%CI 0.001 - 0.54, p = 0.049) and the fundoscope’s green light filter (ß 0.27, 95%CI 0.07 - 0.47, p = 0.009), as well as maintaining still (ß 0.40, 95%CI 0.08 - 0.72, p = 0.02) and not blinking (ß 0.38, 95%CI 0.07 - 0.70, p = 0.02) during photo acquisition. These participants were also less willing to repeat the ECG-gated fundoscope procedure (ß 0.29, 95%CI 0.07 - 0.52, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with diabetes mellitus, especially with poorer self-rated health, had a more negative experience with the ECG-gated fundoscope than the EndoPAT2000 system. Difficulties experienced under examination by the ECG-gated fundoscope appear related to the procedural design, which requires amendments improving patient comfort and compliance. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9167168/ /pubmed/35673505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40200-022-00996-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Lal, Anchal
Dave, Neha
Kazi, Samia
Mitchell, Paul
Thiagalingam, Aravinda
Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus
title Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus
title_full Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus
title_short Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus
title_sort comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167168/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35673505
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40200-022-00996-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lalanchal comparisonofexperiencesandpreferencesfollowingnoninvasivecardiovascularriskproceduresacrosssectionalsurveyinparticipantswithandwithoutdiabetesmellitus
AT daveneha comparisonofexperiencesandpreferencesfollowingnoninvasivecardiovascularriskproceduresacrosssectionalsurveyinparticipantswithandwithoutdiabetesmellitus
AT kazisamia comparisonofexperiencesandpreferencesfollowingnoninvasivecardiovascularriskproceduresacrosssectionalsurveyinparticipantswithandwithoutdiabetesmellitus
AT mitchellpaul comparisonofexperiencesandpreferencesfollowingnoninvasivecardiovascularriskproceduresacrosssectionalsurveyinparticipantswithandwithoutdiabetesmellitus
AT thiagalingamaravinda comparisonofexperiencesandpreferencesfollowingnoninvasivecardiovascularriskproceduresacrosssectionalsurveyinparticipantswithandwithoutdiabetesmellitus