Rapid antigenic test (TRA) versus RT-PCR: Experience of CHU IBN ROCHD Casablanca

• Ag-RDTs have a good specificity varying from 93.2 to 100% depending on the kits in comparison with RT-PCR. • In our study, the specificity of the BIOSENSOR® test was 100% and the sensitivity was 47.17%. • This drop of the specificity is explained by the decrease of the viral load with the progress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elfadel, O., Zannane, F., Abdallaoui, M.Soussi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Case Series
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103908
_version_ 1784720803882860544
author Elfadel, O.
Zannane, F.
Abdallaoui, M.Soussi
author_facet Elfadel, O.
Zannane, F.
Abdallaoui, M.Soussi
author_sort Elfadel, O.
collection PubMed
description • Ag-RDTs have a good specificity varying from 93.2 to 100% depending on the kits in comparison with RT-PCR. • In our study, the specificity of the BIOSENSOR® test was 100% and the sensitivity was 47.17%. • This drop of the specificity is explained by the decrease of the viral load with the progression of the infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9167464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91674642022-06-07 Rapid antigenic test (TRA) versus RT-PCR: Experience of CHU IBN ROCHD Casablanca Elfadel, O. Zannane, F. Abdallaoui, M.Soussi Ann Med Surg (Lond) Case Series • Ag-RDTs have a good specificity varying from 93.2 to 100% depending on the kits in comparison with RT-PCR. • In our study, the specificity of the BIOSENSOR® test was 100% and the sensitivity was 47.17%. • This drop of the specificity is explained by the decrease of the viral load with the progression of the infection. Elsevier 2022-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9167464/ /pubmed/35692968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103908 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Elfadel, O.
Zannane, F.
Abdallaoui, M.Soussi
Rapid antigenic test (TRA) versus RT-PCR: Experience of CHU IBN ROCHD Casablanca
title Rapid antigenic test (TRA) versus RT-PCR: Experience of CHU IBN ROCHD Casablanca
title_full Rapid antigenic test (TRA) versus RT-PCR: Experience of CHU IBN ROCHD Casablanca
title_fullStr Rapid antigenic test (TRA) versus RT-PCR: Experience of CHU IBN ROCHD Casablanca
title_full_unstemmed Rapid antigenic test (TRA) versus RT-PCR: Experience of CHU IBN ROCHD Casablanca
title_short Rapid antigenic test (TRA) versus RT-PCR: Experience of CHU IBN ROCHD Casablanca
title_sort rapid antigenic test (tra) versus rt-pcr: experience of chu ibn rochd casablanca
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103908
work_keys_str_mv AT elfadelo rapidantigenictesttraversusrtpcrexperienceofchuibnrochdcasablanca
AT zannanef rapidantigenictesttraversusrtpcrexperienceofchuibnrochdcasablanca
AT abdallaouimsoussi rapidantigenictesttraversusrtpcrexperienceofchuibnrochdcasablanca

Ejemplares similares