Cargando…

The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial)

BACKGROUND: Controversial results have been reported regarding the impact of photobiomodulation (PBM) on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two PBM protocols, one of them requiring a high application frequency (on days...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eid, Farah Y., El-Kenany, Walid A., Mowafy, Mohamed I., El-Kalza, Ahmed R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02251-w
_version_ 1784720821813510144
author Eid, Farah Y.
El-Kenany, Walid A.
Mowafy, Mohamed I.
El-Kalza, Ahmed R.
author_facet Eid, Farah Y.
El-Kenany, Walid A.
Mowafy, Mohamed I.
El-Kalza, Ahmed R.
author_sort Eid, Farah Y.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controversial results have been reported regarding the impact of photobiomodulation (PBM) on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two PBM protocols, one of them requiring a high application frequency (on days 0, 3, 7, 14, then every 2 weeks), while the second requires less frequent applications (every 3 weeks), on OIIRR accompanying orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Twenty female patients were recruited for this randomized controlled trial, requiring the therapeutic extraction of maxillary first premolars, and they were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. In Group A, one side of the maxillary arch randomly received PBM on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and every 2 weeks thereafter, while in Group B, one side was randomly chosen to receive PBM every 3 weeks. The laser applied was a Diode laser with a wavelength of 980 nm, in a continuous mode. Canine retraction in both groups was carried out using closed-coil springs, delivering 150 g of force, and the force level was checked every 3 weeks, over a 12-week study period. Pre-retraction and post-retraction cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done for the evaluation of OIIRR. RESULTS: No significant differences in the amount of OIIRR have been reported between the laser and control sides in both groups A and B. Also, no significant differences have been reported between the laser sides in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Photobiomodulation does not affect OIIRR, whether by increasing or decreasing its occurrence, with both laser application protocols. Therefore, it can be stated that PBM does not result in root resorption less than the commonly observed range elicited with conventional orthodontic treatment, and that it has no effect on OIIRR. Trial registration Two Low-level Laser Irradiation Protocols on the Rate of Canine Retraction (NCT04926389), 15/06/2021—retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04926389.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9167544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91675442022-06-06 The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial) Eid, Farah Y. El-Kenany, Walid A. Mowafy, Mohamed I. El-Kalza, Ahmed R. BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Controversial results have been reported regarding the impact of photobiomodulation (PBM) on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR). The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two PBM protocols, one of them requiring a high application frequency (on days 0, 3, 7, 14, then every 2 weeks), while the second requires less frequent applications (every 3 weeks), on OIIRR accompanying orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Twenty female patients were recruited for this randomized controlled trial, requiring the therapeutic extraction of maxillary first premolars, and they were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. In Group A, one side of the maxillary arch randomly received PBM on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and every 2 weeks thereafter, while in Group B, one side was randomly chosen to receive PBM every 3 weeks. The laser applied was a Diode laser with a wavelength of 980 nm, in a continuous mode. Canine retraction in both groups was carried out using closed-coil springs, delivering 150 g of force, and the force level was checked every 3 weeks, over a 12-week study period. Pre-retraction and post-retraction cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done for the evaluation of OIIRR. RESULTS: No significant differences in the amount of OIIRR have been reported between the laser and control sides in both groups A and B. Also, no significant differences have been reported between the laser sides in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Photobiomodulation does not affect OIIRR, whether by increasing or decreasing its occurrence, with both laser application protocols. Therefore, it can be stated that PBM does not result in root resorption less than the commonly observed range elicited with conventional orthodontic treatment, and that it has no effect on OIIRR. Trial registration Two Low-level Laser Irradiation Protocols on the Rate of Canine Retraction (NCT04926389), 15/06/2021—retrospectively registered. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04926389. BioMed Central 2022-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9167544/ /pubmed/35659655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02251-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Eid, Farah Y.
El-Kenany, Walid A.
Mowafy, Mohamed I.
El-Kalza, Ahmed R.
The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
title The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
title_full The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
title_fullStr The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
title_full_unstemmed The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
title_short The influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
title_sort influence of two photobiomodulation protocols on orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption (a randomized controlled clinical trial)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02251-w
work_keys_str_mv AT eidfarahy theinfluenceoftwophotobiomodulationprotocolsonorthodonticallyinducedinflammatoryrootresorptionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT elkenanywalida theinfluenceoftwophotobiomodulationprotocolsonorthodonticallyinducedinflammatoryrootresorptionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT mowafymohamedi theinfluenceoftwophotobiomodulationprotocolsonorthodonticallyinducedinflammatoryrootresorptionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT elkalzaahmedr theinfluenceoftwophotobiomodulationprotocolsonorthodonticallyinducedinflammatoryrootresorptionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT eidfarahy influenceoftwophotobiomodulationprotocolsonorthodonticallyinducedinflammatoryrootresorptionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT elkenanywalida influenceoftwophotobiomodulationprotocolsonorthodonticallyinducedinflammatoryrootresorptionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT mowafymohamedi influenceoftwophotobiomodulationprotocolsonorthodonticallyinducedinflammatoryrootresorptionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT elkalzaahmedr influenceoftwophotobiomodulationprotocolsonorthodonticallyinducedinflammatoryrootresorptionarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial