Cargando…

Academy IRIS(®) Registry Analysis of Incidence of Laser Capsulotomy Due to Posterior Capsule Opacification After Intraocular Lens Implantation

PURPOSE: Academy IRIS(®) (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry was used to determine the incidence of postoperative neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser capsulotomy (Nd:YAG) and time to posterior capsular opacification (PCO) diagnosis based on intraocular lens (IOL) type and brand. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horn, Jeffrey D, Fisher, Bret L, Terveen, Daniel, Fevrier, Helene, Merchea, Mohinder, Gu, Xiaolin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35673348
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S358059
_version_ 1784720831743524864
author Horn, Jeffrey D
Fisher, Bret L
Terveen, Daniel
Fevrier, Helene
Merchea, Mohinder
Gu, Xiaolin
author_facet Horn, Jeffrey D
Fisher, Bret L
Terveen, Daniel
Fevrier, Helene
Merchea, Mohinder
Gu, Xiaolin
author_sort Horn, Jeffrey D
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Academy IRIS(®) (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry was used to determine the incidence of postoperative neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser capsulotomy (Nd:YAG) and time to posterior capsular opacification (PCO) diagnosis based on intraocular lens (IOL) type and brand. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included eyes implanted with 1 of 2 IOL brands, with ≥365 days of follow-up available in the IRIS Registry, and ≥2 visits within 180 days of surgery. Analyses included Nd:YAG incidence due to PCO within 1 year after surgery by IOL type and brand, mean time to PCO diagnosis, and mean time to Nd:YAG. RESULTS: Of 89,947 eyes after cataract surgery, 24,834 (28%) had PCO diagnosis within 365 days, and 9262 (10%) underwent Nd:YAG; 4.1% of 57,523 eyes with monofocal and 21.2% of 32,424 eyes with diffractive multifocal (MF) or diffractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs had Nd:YAG. Nd:YAG was 3.2 times more likely in eyes with diffractive MF or diffractive EDOF IOLs versus monofocal. For monofocal IOLs, 3.2% of eyes with AcrySof(®) and 8.1% of eyes with Tecnis(®) had Nd:YAG (P<0.0001). For diffractive MF or diffractive EDOF IOLs, 13.0% of eyes with AcrySof and 21.7% of eyes with Tecnis had Nd:YAG (P<0.0001). Nd:YAG risk was 2.4 times higher in eyes with Tecnis versus AcrySof IOLs. Overall, mean time to PCO diagnosis and Nd:YAG was 150.7 and 180.7 days. Mean time to PCO for monofocal versus diffractive MF or diffractive EDOF IOLs was 165.3 versus 139.7 days (P<0.0001). Mean time to Nd:YAG for monofocal versus diffractive MF or diffractive EDOF IOLs was 196.4 versus 175.3 days (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Real-world data for AcrySof and Tecnis IOLs revealed lower Nd:YAG rates and longer time to PCO diagnosis and Nd:YAG after monofocal versus diffractive multifocal or diffractive EDOF implantation. Nd:YAG rates were significantly lower with AcrySof versus Tecnis IOLs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9167596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91675962022-06-06 Academy IRIS(®) Registry Analysis of Incidence of Laser Capsulotomy Due to Posterior Capsule Opacification After Intraocular Lens Implantation Horn, Jeffrey D Fisher, Bret L Terveen, Daniel Fevrier, Helene Merchea, Mohinder Gu, Xiaolin Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Academy IRIS(®) (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry was used to determine the incidence of postoperative neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser capsulotomy (Nd:YAG) and time to posterior capsular opacification (PCO) diagnosis based on intraocular lens (IOL) type and brand. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included eyes implanted with 1 of 2 IOL brands, with ≥365 days of follow-up available in the IRIS Registry, and ≥2 visits within 180 days of surgery. Analyses included Nd:YAG incidence due to PCO within 1 year after surgery by IOL type and brand, mean time to PCO diagnosis, and mean time to Nd:YAG. RESULTS: Of 89,947 eyes after cataract surgery, 24,834 (28%) had PCO diagnosis within 365 days, and 9262 (10%) underwent Nd:YAG; 4.1% of 57,523 eyes with monofocal and 21.2% of 32,424 eyes with diffractive multifocal (MF) or diffractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs had Nd:YAG. Nd:YAG was 3.2 times more likely in eyes with diffractive MF or diffractive EDOF IOLs versus monofocal. For monofocal IOLs, 3.2% of eyes with AcrySof(®) and 8.1% of eyes with Tecnis(®) had Nd:YAG (P<0.0001). For diffractive MF or diffractive EDOF IOLs, 13.0% of eyes with AcrySof and 21.7% of eyes with Tecnis had Nd:YAG (P<0.0001). Nd:YAG risk was 2.4 times higher in eyes with Tecnis versus AcrySof IOLs. Overall, mean time to PCO diagnosis and Nd:YAG was 150.7 and 180.7 days. Mean time to PCO for monofocal versus diffractive MF or diffractive EDOF IOLs was 165.3 versus 139.7 days (P<0.0001). Mean time to Nd:YAG for monofocal versus diffractive MF or diffractive EDOF IOLs was 196.4 versus 175.3 days (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Real-world data for AcrySof and Tecnis IOLs revealed lower Nd:YAG rates and longer time to PCO diagnosis and Nd:YAG after monofocal versus diffractive multifocal or diffractive EDOF implantation. Nd:YAG rates were significantly lower with AcrySof versus Tecnis IOLs. Dove 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9167596/ /pubmed/35673348 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S358059 Text en © 2022 Horn et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Horn, Jeffrey D
Fisher, Bret L
Terveen, Daniel
Fevrier, Helene
Merchea, Mohinder
Gu, Xiaolin
Academy IRIS(®) Registry Analysis of Incidence of Laser Capsulotomy Due to Posterior Capsule Opacification After Intraocular Lens Implantation
title Academy IRIS(®) Registry Analysis of Incidence of Laser Capsulotomy Due to Posterior Capsule Opacification After Intraocular Lens Implantation
title_full Academy IRIS(®) Registry Analysis of Incidence of Laser Capsulotomy Due to Posterior Capsule Opacification After Intraocular Lens Implantation
title_fullStr Academy IRIS(®) Registry Analysis of Incidence of Laser Capsulotomy Due to Posterior Capsule Opacification After Intraocular Lens Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Academy IRIS(®) Registry Analysis of Incidence of Laser Capsulotomy Due to Posterior Capsule Opacification After Intraocular Lens Implantation
title_short Academy IRIS(®) Registry Analysis of Incidence of Laser Capsulotomy Due to Posterior Capsule Opacification After Intraocular Lens Implantation
title_sort academy iris(®) registry analysis of incidence of laser capsulotomy due to posterior capsule opacification after intraocular lens implantation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35673348
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S358059
work_keys_str_mv AT hornjeffreyd academyirisregistryanalysisofincidenceoflasercapsulotomyduetoposteriorcapsuleopacificationafterintraocularlensimplantation
AT fisherbretl academyirisregistryanalysisofincidenceoflasercapsulotomyduetoposteriorcapsuleopacificationafterintraocularlensimplantation
AT terveendaniel academyirisregistryanalysisofincidenceoflasercapsulotomyduetoposteriorcapsuleopacificationafterintraocularlensimplantation
AT fevrierhelene academyirisregistryanalysisofincidenceoflasercapsulotomyduetoposteriorcapsuleopacificationafterintraocularlensimplantation
AT mercheamohinder academyirisregistryanalysisofincidenceoflasercapsulotomyduetoposteriorcapsuleopacificationafterintraocularlensimplantation
AT guxiaolin academyirisregistryanalysisofincidenceoflasercapsulotomyduetoposteriorcapsuleopacificationafterintraocularlensimplantation