Cargando…

Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up

OBJECTIVE: The current study sought to examine the predictive validity of the purging disorder diagnosis at long‐term follow‐up by comparing naturalistic outcomes with bulimia nervosa. METHOD: Women with purging disorder (N = 84) or bulimia nervosa (N = 133) who had completed comprehensive baseline...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Forney, Katherine Jean, Brown, Tiffany A., Crosby, Ross D., Klein, Kelly M., Keel, Pamela K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23712
_version_ 1784720853490991104
author Forney, Katherine Jean
Brown, Tiffany A.
Crosby, Ross D.
Klein, Kelly M.
Keel, Pamela K.
author_facet Forney, Katherine Jean
Brown, Tiffany A.
Crosby, Ross D.
Klein, Kelly M.
Keel, Pamela K.
author_sort Forney, Katherine Jean
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The current study sought to examine the predictive validity of the purging disorder diagnosis at long‐term follow‐up by comparing naturalistic outcomes with bulimia nervosa. METHOD: Women with purging disorder (N = 84) or bulimia nervosa (N = 133) who had completed comprehensive baseline assessments as part of one of three studies between 2000 and 2012 were sought for follow‐up assessment. Nearly all (94.5%) responded to recruitment materials and 150 (69% of sought sample; 83.3% non‐Hispanic white; 33.40 [7.63] years old) participated at an average of 10.59 (3.71) years follow‐up. Participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV, and a questionnaire battery. Diagnostic groups were compared on eating disorder (illness status, recovery status, and eating pathology) and related outcomes. Group differences in predictors of outcome were explored. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in eating disorder presence (p = .70), recovery status (p = .87), and level of eating pathology (p = .17) between diagnostic groups at follow‐up. Post hoc equivalence tests indicated group differences were smaller than a medium effect size (p's ≤ .005). Groups differed in diagnosis at follow‐up (p = .002); diagnostic stability was more likely than cross‐over to bulimia nervosa for women with baseline purging disorder (p = .004). DISCUSSION: Although purging disorder and bulimia nervosa do not differ in long‐term outcomes, the relative stability in clinical presentation suggests baseline group differences in clinical presentation may be useful in augmenting treatments for purging disorder. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: While purging disorder is classified as an “other specified” eating disorder, individuals who experience this disorder have comparable negative long‐term outcomes as those with bulimia nervosa. This highlights the importance of screening for and treating purging disorder as a full‐threshold eating disorder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9167719
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91677192022-10-14 Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up Forney, Katherine Jean Brown, Tiffany A. Crosby, Ross D. Klein, Kelly M. Keel, Pamela K. Int J Eat Disord Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The current study sought to examine the predictive validity of the purging disorder diagnosis at long‐term follow‐up by comparing naturalistic outcomes with bulimia nervosa. METHOD: Women with purging disorder (N = 84) or bulimia nervosa (N = 133) who had completed comprehensive baseline assessments as part of one of three studies between 2000 and 2012 were sought for follow‐up assessment. Nearly all (94.5%) responded to recruitment materials and 150 (69% of sought sample; 83.3% non‐Hispanic white; 33.40 [7.63] years old) participated at an average of 10.59 (3.71) years follow‐up. Participants completed the Eating Disorder Examination, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV, and a questionnaire battery. Diagnostic groups were compared on eating disorder (illness status, recovery status, and eating pathology) and related outcomes. Group differences in predictors of outcome were explored. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in eating disorder presence (p = .70), recovery status (p = .87), and level of eating pathology (p = .17) between diagnostic groups at follow‐up. Post hoc equivalence tests indicated group differences were smaller than a medium effect size (p's ≤ .005). Groups differed in diagnosis at follow‐up (p = .002); diagnostic stability was more likely than cross‐over to bulimia nervosa for women with baseline purging disorder (p = .004). DISCUSSION: Although purging disorder and bulimia nervosa do not differ in long‐term outcomes, the relative stability in clinical presentation suggests baseline group differences in clinical presentation may be useful in augmenting treatments for purging disorder. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: While purging disorder is classified as an “other specified” eating disorder, individuals who experience this disorder have comparable negative long‐term outcomes as those with bulimia nervosa. This highlights the importance of screening for and treating purging disorder as a full‐threshold eating disorder. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-04-02 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9167719/ /pubmed/35366014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23712 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Forney, Katherine Jean
Brown, Tiffany A.
Crosby, Ross D.
Klein, Kelly M.
Keel, Pamela K.
Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up
title Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up
title_full Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up
title_fullStr Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up
title_short Evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up
title_sort evaluating the predictive validity of purging disorder by comparison to bulimia nervosa at long‐term follow‐up
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167719/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35366014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23712
work_keys_str_mv AT forneykatherinejean evaluatingthepredictivevalidityofpurgingdisorderbycomparisontobulimianervosaatlongtermfollowup
AT browntiffanya evaluatingthepredictivevalidityofpurgingdisorderbycomparisontobulimianervosaatlongtermfollowup
AT crosbyrossd evaluatingthepredictivevalidityofpurgingdisorderbycomparisontobulimianervosaatlongtermfollowup
AT kleinkellym evaluatingthepredictivevalidityofpurgingdisorderbycomparisontobulimianervosaatlongtermfollowup
AT keelpamelak evaluatingthepredictivevalidityofpurgingdisorderbycomparisontobulimianervosaatlongtermfollowup