Cargando…

Evaluation of Zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness

BACKGROUND: Development and evaluation of diagnostics for diseases of epidemic potential are often funded during epidemics, but not afterwards, leaving countries unprepared for the next epidemic. United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) partnered with the United States Agency for Inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boeras, Debi, Diagne, Cheikh Tidiane, Pelegrino, Jose L., Grandadam, Marc, Duong, Veasna, Dussart, Philippe, Brey, Paul, Ruiz, Didye, Adati, Marisa, Wilder-Smith, Annelies, Falconar, Andrew K., Romero, Claudia M., Guzman, Maria, Hasanin, Nagwa, Sall, Amadou, Peeling, Rosanna W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101478
_version_ 1784720872144109568
author Boeras, Debi
Diagne, Cheikh Tidiane
Pelegrino, Jose L.
Grandadam, Marc
Duong, Veasna
Dussart, Philippe
Brey, Paul
Ruiz, Didye
Adati, Marisa
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Falconar, Andrew K.
Romero, Claudia M.
Guzman, Maria
Hasanin, Nagwa
Sall, Amadou
Peeling, Rosanna W.
author_facet Boeras, Debi
Diagne, Cheikh Tidiane
Pelegrino, Jose L.
Grandadam, Marc
Duong, Veasna
Dussart, Philippe
Brey, Paul
Ruiz, Didye
Adati, Marisa
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Falconar, Andrew K.
Romero, Claudia M.
Guzman, Maria
Hasanin, Nagwa
Sall, Amadou
Peeling, Rosanna W.
author_sort Boeras, Debi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Development and evaluation of diagnostics for diseases of epidemic potential are often funded during epidemics, but not afterwards, leaving countries unprepared for the next epidemic. United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) partnered with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to address this important gap by investing in an advance purchase commitment (APC) mechanism to accelerate the development and evaluation of Zika rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for case detection and surveillance. This paper describes the performance evaluation of five Zika RDTs eligible for procurement. METHODS: A network of European Union-funded ZikaPLAN sites in Africa, Asia, Latin America with access to relevant serum specimens were selected to evaluate RDTs developed for the UNICEF APC mechanism. A standardised protocol and evaluation panels were developed and a call for specimens for the evaluation panels issued to different sites. Each site contributed specimens to the evaluation from their biobank. Data were collated, analysed and presented to the UNICEF Procurement Review Group for review. FINDINGS: Three RDTs met the criteria for UNICEF procurement of sensitivity and specificity of 85% against a refence standard. The sensitivity/specificity of the ChemBio anti-Zika Virus (ZIKV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) test was 86.4 %/86.7% and the ChemBio ZCD system for anti-ZIKV IgM was 79.0%/97.1%, anti-dengue virus (DENV) IgM 90.0%/89.2%, anti-Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) IgM 90.6%/97.2%. The sensitivity/specificity of the SD Biosensor anti-ZIKV IgM was 96.8 %/90.8%, anti-DENV IgM 71.8%/83.5%, the DENV nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) glycoprotein 90.0%/90.2%, anti- yellow fever virus (YFV) IgM 84.6%/92.4%, anti-CHIKV IgM 86.3%/97.5%. INTERPRETATION: Three RDTs fulfilled the performance thresholds set by WHO and were eligible for UNICEF procurement. These tests will improve the diagnosis of ZIKV and other arboviral infections as well as providing countries with better tools for surveillance and response to future epidemics. FUNDING: This work was supported by the USAID grant GHA-G-00-07-00007 and ZikaPLAN (European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 734584).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9167860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91678602022-06-22 Evaluation of Zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness Boeras, Debi Diagne, Cheikh Tidiane Pelegrino, Jose L. Grandadam, Marc Duong, Veasna Dussart, Philippe Brey, Paul Ruiz, Didye Adati, Marisa Wilder-Smith, Annelies Falconar, Andrew K. Romero, Claudia M. Guzman, Maria Hasanin, Nagwa Sall, Amadou Peeling, Rosanna W. eClinicalMedicine Articles BACKGROUND: Development and evaluation of diagnostics for diseases of epidemic potential are often funded during epidemics, but not afterwards, leaving countries unprepared for the next epidemic. United Nations Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF) partnered with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to address this important gap by investing in an advance purchase commitment (APC) mechanism to accelerate the development and evaluation of Zika rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for case detection and surveillance. This paper describes the performance evaluation of five Zika RDTs eligible for procurement. METHODS: A network of European Union-funded ZikaPLAN sites in Africa, Asia, Latin America with access to relevant serum specimens were selected to evaluate RDTs developed for the UNICEF APC mechanism. A standardised protocol and evaluation panels were developed and a call for specimens for the evaluation panels issued to different sites. Each site contributed specimens to the evaluation from their biobank. Data were collated, analysed and presented to the UNICEF Procurement Review Group for review. FINDINGS: Three RDTs met the criteria for UNICEF procurement of sensitivity and specificity of 85% against a refence standard. The sensitivity/specificity of the ChemBio anti-Zika Virus (ZIKV) immunoglobulin M (IgM) test was 86.4 %/86.7% and the ChemBio ZCD system for anti-ZIKV IgM was 79.0%/97.1%, anti-dengue virus (DENV) IgM 90.0%/89.2%, anti-Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) IgM 90.6%/97.2%. The sensitivity/specificity of the SD Biosensor anti-ZIKV IgM was 96.8 %/90.8%, anti-DENV IgM 71.8%/83.5%, the DENV nonstructural protein 1 (NS1) glycoprotein 90.0%/90.2%, anti- yellow fever virus (YFV) IgM 84.6%/92.4%, anti-CHIKV IgM 86.3%/97.5%. INTERPRETATION: Three RDTs fulfilled the performance thresholds set by WHO and were eligible for UNICEF procurement. These tests will improve the diagnosis of ZIKV and other arboviral infections as well as providing countries with better tools for surveillance and response to future epidemics. FUNDING: This work was supported by the USAID grant GHA-G-00-07-00007 and ZikaPLAN (European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No. 734584). Elsevier 2022-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9167860/ /pubmed/35747186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101478 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Boeras, Debi
Diagne, Cheikh Tidiane
Pelegrino, Jose L.
Grandadam, Marc
Duong, Veasna
Dussart, Philippe
Brey, Paul
Ruiz, Didye
Adati, Marisa
Wilder-Smith, Annelies
Falconar, Andrew K.
Romero, Claudia M.
Guzman, Maria
Hasanin, Nagwa
Sall, Amadou
Peeling, Rosanna W.
Evaluation of Zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness
title Evaluation of Zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness
title_full Evaluation of Zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness
title_fullStr Evaluation of Zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness
title_short Evaluation of Zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness
title_sort evaluation of zika rapid tests as aids for clinical diagnosis and epidemic preparedness
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35747186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101478
work_keys_str_mv AT boerasdebi evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT diagnecheikhtidiane evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT pelegrinojosel evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT grandadammarc evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT duongveasna evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT dussartphilippe evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT breypaul evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT ruizdidye evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT adatimarisa evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT wildersmithannelies evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT falconarandrewk evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT romeroclaudiam evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT guzmanmaria evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT hasaninnagwa evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT sallamadou evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness
AT peelingrosannaw evaluationofzikarapidtestsasaidsforclinicaldiagnosisandepidemicpreparedness