Cargando…

CHX and a Face Shield Cannot Prevent Contamination of Surgical Masks

BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination on surgical masks puts a threat to medical staff and patients. The aim of the study was to investigate its contamination during dental treatments, wearing a face shield and performing a pre-procedural mouth rinsing with chlorhexidine (CHX). METHODS: In this prospe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gund, Madline P., Naim, Jusef, Hannig, Matthias, Halfmann, Alexander, Gärtner, Barbara, Boros, Gabor, Rupf, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.896308
_version_ 1784720892914302976
author Gund, Madline P.
Naim, Jusef
Hannig, Matthias
Halfmann, Alexander
Gärtner, Barbara
Boros, Gabor
Rupf, Stefan
author_facet Gund, Madline P.
Naim, Jusef
Hannig, Matthias
Halfmann, Alexander
Gärtner, Barbara
Boros, Gabor
Rupf, Stefan
author_sort Gund, Madline P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination on surgical masks puts a threat to medical staff and patients. The aim of the study was to investigate its contamination during dental treatments, wearing a face shield and performing a pre-procedural mouth rinsing with chlorhexidine (CHX). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, 306 treatments were included, 141 single-tooth (restorations) and 165 total dentition treatments (preventive or periodontal supportive ultrasonic application). A total of three groups (each: n = 102) were formed: participants rinsed for 60 s with 0.1 % CHX or with water before treatment, and, for control, a non-rinsing group was included. In view of the COVID-19 pandemic, a face shield covering the surgical mask enhanced personal protective equipment. After treatment, masks were imprinted on agar plates and incubated at 35°C for 48 h. Bacteria were classified by phenotypic characteristics, biochemical assay methods, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Colonies (CFU) were counted and mean values were compared (Kruskal–Wallis-, U test, p < 0.05). RESULTS: Chlorhexidine led to a statistically significant reduction of bacterial contamination of the surgical mask (mean: 24 CFU) in comparison with water (mean: 47 CFU) and non-rinsing (mean: 80 CFU). Furthermore, rinsing with water reduced CFU significantly in comparison with the non-rinsing group. There were no significant differences between single or total dentition treatments. Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Micrococcus spp., and Bacillus spp. dominated, representing the oral and cutaneous flora. CONCLUSION: A pre-procedural mouth rinse is useful to reduce the bacterial load of the surgical mask. However, contamination cannot be prevented completely, even by applying a face shield. In particular, during pandemic, it is important to consider that these additional protective measures are not able to completely avoid the transmission of pathogens bearing aerosols to the facial region. If antiseptic rinsing solutions are not available, rinsing with water is also useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9167959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91679592022-06-07 CHX and a Face Shield Cannot Prevent Contamination of Surgical Masks Gund, Madline P. Naim, Jusef Hannig, Matthias Halfmann, Alexander Gärtner, Barbara Boros, Gabor Rupf, Stefan Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination on surgical masks puts a threat to medical staff and patients. The aim of the study was to investigate its contamination during dental treatments, wearing a face shield and performing a pre-procedural mouth rinsing with chlorhexidine (CHX). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, 306 treatments were included, 141 single-tooth (restorations) and 165 total dentition treatments (preventive or periodontal supportive ultrasonic application). A total of three groups (each: n = 102) were formed: participants rinsed for 60 s with 0.1 % CHX or with water before treatment, and, for control, a non-rinsing group was included. In view of the COVID-19 pandemic, a face shield covering the surgical mask enhanced personal protective equipment. After treatment, masks were imprinted on agar plates and incubated at 35°C for 48 h. Bacteria were classified by phenotypic characteristics, biochemical assay methods, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). Colonies (CFU) were counted and mean values were compared (Kruskal–Wallis-, U test, p < 0.05). RESULTS: Chlorhexidine led to a statistically significant reduction of bacterial contamination of the surgical mask (mean: 24 CFU) in comparison with water (mean: 47 CFU) and non-rinsing (mean: 80 CFU). Furthermore, rinsing with water reduced CFU significantly in comparison with the non-rinsing group. There were no significant differences between single or total dentition treatments. Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Micrococcus spp., and Bacillus spp. dominated, representing the oral and cutaneous flora. CONCLUSION: A pre-procedural mouth rinse is useful to reduce the bacterial load of the surgical mask. However, contamination cannot be prevented completely, even by applying a face shield. In particular, during pandemic, it is important to consider that these additional protective measures are not able to completely avoid the transmission of pathogens bearing aerosols to the facial region. If antiseptic rinsing solutions are not available, rinsing with water is also useful. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9167959/ /pubmed/35677818 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.896308 Text en Copyright © 2022 Gund, Naim, Hannig, Halfmann, Gärtner, Boros and Rupf. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Gund, Madline P.
Naim, Jusef
Hannig, Matthias
Halfmann, Alexander
Gärtner, Barbara
Boros, Gabor
Rupf, Stefan
CHX and a Face Shield Cannot Prevent Contamination of Surgical Masks
title CHX and a Face Shield Cannot Prevent Contamination of Surgical Masks
title_full CHX and a Face Shield Cannot Prevent Contamination of Surgical Masks
title_fullStr CHX and a Face Shield Cannot Prevent Contamination of Surgical Masks
title_full_unstemmed CHX and a Face Shield Cannot Prevent Contamination of Surgical Masks
title_short CHX and a Face Shield Cannot Prevent Contamination of Surgical Masks
title_sort chx and a face shield cannot prevent contamination of surgical masks
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677818
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.896308
work_keys_str_mv AT gundmadlinep chxandafaceshieldcannotpreventcontaminationofsurgicalmasks
AT naimjusef chxandafaceshieldcannotpreventcontaminationofsurgicalmasks
AT hannigmatthias chxandafaceshieldcannotpreventcontaminationofsurgicalmasks
AT halfmannalexander chxandafaceshieldcannotpreventcontaminationofsurgicalmasks
AT gartnerbarbara chxandafaceshieldcannotpreventcontaminationofsurgicalmasks
AT borosgabor chxandafaceshieldcannotpreventcontaminationofsurgicalmasks
AT rupfstefan chxandafaceshieldcannotpreventcontaminationofsurgicalmasks