Cargando…
Myths in magnetosensation
The ability to detect magnetic fields is a sensory modality that is used by many animals to navigate. While first postulated in the 1800s, for decades, it was considered a biological myth. A series of elegant behavioral experiments in the 1960s and 1970s showed conclusively that the sense is real; h...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104454 |
_version_ | 1784720895706660864 |
---|---|
author | Nimpf, Simon Keays, David A. |
author_facet | Nimpf, Simon Keays, David A. |
author_sort | Nimpf, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability to detect magnetic fields is a sensory modality that is used by many animals to navigate. While first postulated in the 1800s, for decades, it was considered a biological myth. A series of elegant behavioral experiments in the 1960s and 1970s showed conclusively that the sense is real; however, the underlying mechanism(s) remained unresolved. Consequently, this has given rise to a series of beliefs that are critically analyzed in this manuscript. We address six assertions: (1) Magnetoreception does not exist; (2) It has to be magnetite; (3) Birds have a conserved six loci magnetic sense system in their upper beak; (4) It has to be cryptochrome; (5) MagR is a protein biocompass; and (6) The electromagnetic induction hypothesis is dead. In advancing counter-arguments for these beliefs, we hope to stimulate debate, new ideas, and the design of well-controlled experiments that can aid our understanding of this fascinating biological phenomenon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9167971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91679712022-06-07 Myths in magnetosensation Nimpf, Simon Keays, David A. iScience Review The ability to detect magnetic fields is a sensory modality that is used by many animals to navigate. While first postulated in the 1800s, for decades, it was considered a biological myth. A series of elegant behavioral experiments in the 1960s and 1970s showed conclusively that the sense is real; however, the underlying mechanism(s) remained unresolved. Consequently, this has given rise to a series of beliefs that are critically analyzed in this manuscript. We address six assertions: (1) Magnetoreception does not exist; (2) It has to be magnetite; (3) Birds have a conserved six loci magnetic sense system in their upper beak; (4) It has to be cryptochrome; (5) MagR is a protein biocompass; and (6) The electromagnetic induction hypothesis is dead. In advancing counter-arguments for these beliefs, we hope to stimulate debate, new ideas, and the design of well-controlled experiments that can aid our understanding of this fascinating biological phenomenon. Elsevier 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9167971/ /pubmed/35677648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104454 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Nimpf, Simon Keays, David A. Myths in magnetosensation |
title | Myths in magnetosensation |
title_full | Myths in magnetosensation |
title_fullStr | Myths in magnetosensation |
title_full_unstemmed | Myths in magnetosensation |
title_short | Myths in magnetosensation |
title_sort | myths in magnetosensation |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nimpfsimon mythsinmagnetosensation AT keaysdavida mythsinmagnetosensation |