Cargando…
Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios
We describe and validate a feature-based system for calculation of likelihood ratios from 3D digital images of fired cartridge cases. The system includes a database of 3D digital images of the bases of 10 cartridges fired per firearm from approximately 300 firearms of the same class (semi-automatic...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100272 |
_version_ | 1784721028453236736 |
---|---|
author | Basu, Nabanita Bolton-King, Rachel S. Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart |
author_facet | Basu, Nabanita Bolton-King, Rachel S. Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart |
author_sort | Basu, Nabanita |
collection | PubMed |
description | We describe and validate a feature-based system for calculation of likelihood ratios from 3D digital images of fired cartridge cases. The system includes a database of 3D digital images of the bases of 10 cartridges fired per firearm from approximately 300 firearms of the same class (semi-automatic pistols that fire 9 mm diameter centre-fire Luger-type ammunition, and that have hemispherical firing pins and parallel breech-face marks). The images were captured using Evofinder®, an imaging system that is commonly used by operational forensic laboratories. A key component of the research reported is the comparison of different feature-extraction methods. Feature sets compared include those previously proposed in the literature, plus Zernike-moment based features. Comparisons are also made of using feature sets extracted from the firing-pin impression, from the breech-face region, and from the whole region of interest (firing-pin impression + breech-face region + flowback if present). Likelihood ratios are calculated using a statistical modelling pipeline that is standard in forensic voice comparison. Validation is conducted and results are assessed using validation procedures and validation metrics and graphics that are standard in forensic voice comparison. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9168521 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91685212022-06-07 Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios Basu, Nabanita Bolton-King, Rachel S. Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart Forensic Sci Int Synerg Policy and Management (in memory of Jay Siegel) We describe and validate a feature-based system for calculation of likelihood ratios from 3D digital images of fired cartridge cases. The system includes a database of 3D digital images of the bases of 10 cartridges fired per firearm from approximately 300 firearms of the same class (semi-automatic pistols that fire 9 mm diameter centre-fire Luger-type ammunition, and that have hemispherical firing pins and parallel breech-face marks). The images were captured using Evofinder®, an imaging system that is commonly used by operational forensic laboratories. A key component of the research reported is the comparison of different feature-extraction methods. Feature sets compared include those previously proposed in the literature, plus Zernike-moment based features. Comparisons are also made of using feature sets extracted from the firing-pin impression, from the breech-face region, and from the whole region of interest (firing-pin impression + breech-face region + flowback if present). Likelihood ratios are calculated using a statistical modelling pipeline that is standard in forensic voice comparison. Validation is conducted and results are assessed using validation procedures and validation metrics and graphics that are standard in forensic voice comparison. Elsevier 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9168521/ /pubmed/35677322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100272 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Policy and Management (in memory of Jay Siegel) Basu, Nabanita Bolton-King, Rachel S. Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios |
title | Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios |
title_full | Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios |
title_fullStr | Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios |
title_full_unstemmed | Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios |
title_short | Forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: Feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios |
title_sort | forensic comparison of fired cartridge cases: feature-extraction methods for feature-based calculation of likelihood ratios |
topic | Policy and Management (in memory of Jay Siegel) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168521/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT basunabanita forensiccomparisonoffiredcartridgecasesfeatureextractionmethodsforfeaturebasedcalculationoflikelihoodratios AT boltonkingrachels forensiccomparisonoffiredcartridgecasesfeatureextractionmethodsforfeaturebasedcalculationoflikelihoodratios AT morrisongeoffreystewart forensiccomparisonoffiredcartridgecasesfeatureextractionmethodsforfeaturebasedcalculationoflikelihoodratios |