Cargando…
A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on Interventions Adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) Model on Holistic Well-Being
BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to examine existing randomized controlled trials on interventions adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) model and evaluated the effectiveness of holistic well-being outcomes. Following three key concepts of the BMS model, our review questions included (1) How was BM...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515690X221103303 |
_version_ | 1784721091756818432 |
---|---|
author | Li, Tongtong Hu, Xinyue Chi, Iris |
author_facet | Li, Tongtong Hu, Xinyue Chi, Iris |
author_sort | Li, Tongtong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to examine existing randomized controlled trials on interventions adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) model and evaluated the effectiveness of holistic well-being outcomes. Following three key concepts of the BMS model, our review questions included (1) How was BMS defined? (2) What activities were included, and how were they related to BMS dimensions? (3) What were interventionists’ backgrounds, and whether they received BMS training? (4) What were holistic outcomes? and (5) What were the effectiveness and qualities of studies? METHODS: Searches were performed using nine databases for the studies published through August 2020. The process follows PRISMA protocol, and the “risk of bias” tool from the Cochrane Handbook was utilized to determine the quality of included studies. RESULTS: Across 20 included studies, 18 (90%) presented a BMS definition, but only seven (35%) included all three key concepts of the BMS model. Eight studies (40%) offered detailed descriptions of body, mind, and spirit sections, and 12 (60%) mentioned cultural factors. Only five (25%) specified the body, mind, and spirit activities, and only three (15%) reported the BMS training in detail. Seven studies (35%) showed effectiveness in holistic outcomes. Only three (15%) were considered as high quality. CONCLUSION: A unified definition of the BMS model and the guideline to apply the BMS model to design and implement interventions are highly recommended to provide a standard framework for researchers to conduct future studies. The reason for low quality is because the lack of adequate allocation concealment and blindings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9168865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91688652022-06-07 A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on Interventions Adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) Model on Holistic Well-Being Li, Tongtong Hu, Xinyue Chi, Iris J Evid Based Integr Med Topical Review Article BACKGROUND: This systematic review aims to examine existing randomized controlled trials on interventions adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) model and evaluated the effectiveness of holistic well-being outcomes. Following three key concepts of the BMS model, our review questions included (1) How was BMS defined? (2) What activities were included, and how were they related to BMS dimensions? (3) What were interventionists’ backgrounds, and whether they received BMS training? (4) What were holistic outcomes? and (5) What were the effectiveness and qualities of studies? METHODS: Searches were performed using nine databases for the studies published through August 2020. The process follows PRISMA protocol, and the “risk of bias” tool from the Cochrane Handbook was utilized to determine the quality of included studies. RESULTS: Across 20 included studies, 18 (90%) presented a BMS definition, but only seven (35%) included all three key concepts of the BMS model. Eight studies (40%) offered detailed descriptions of body, mind, and spirit sections, and 12 (60%) mentioned cultural factors. Only five (25%) specified the body, mind, and spirit activities, and only three (15%) reported the BMS training in detail. Seven studies (35%) showed effectiveness in holistic outcomes. Only three (15%) were considered as high quality. CONCLUSION: A unified definition of the BMS model and the guideline to apply the BMS model to design and implement interventions are highly recommended to provide a standard framework for researchers to conduct future studies. The reason for low quality is because the lack of adequate allocation concealment and blindings. SAGE Publications 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9168865/ /pubmed/35651305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515690X221103303 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Topical Review Article Li, Tongtong Hu, Xinyue Chi, Iris A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on Interventions Adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) Model on Holistic Well-Being |
title | A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on Interventions
Adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) Model on Holistic Well-Being |
title_full | A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on Interventions
Adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) Model on Holistic Well-Being |
title_fullStr | A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on Interventions
Adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) Model on Holistic Well-Being |
title_full_unstemmed | A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on Interventions
Adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) Model on Holistic Well-Being |
title_short | A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials on Interventions
Adopting Body-Mind-Spirit (BMS) Model on Holistic Well-Being |
title_sort | systematic review of randomized controlled trials on interventions
adopting body-mind-spirit (bms) model on holistic well-being |
topic | Topical Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35651305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2515690X221103303 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT litongtong asystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoninterventionsadoptingbodymindspiritbmsmodelonholisticwellbeing AT huxinyue asystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoninterventionsadoptingbodymindspiritbmsmodelonholisticwellbeing AT chiiris asystematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoninterventionsadoptingbodymindspiritbmsmodelonholisticwellbeing AT litongtong systematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoninterventionsadoptingbodymindspiritbmsmodelonholisticwellbeing AT huxinyue systematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoninterventionsadoptingbodymindspiritbmsmodelonholisticwellbeing AT chiiris systematicreviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsoninterventionsadoptingbodymindspiritbmsmodelonholisticwellbeing |