Cargando…
Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1 Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research Interest Group
BACKGROUND: Type 1 tibial spine fractures are nondisplaced or ≤2 mm–displaced fractures of the tibial eminence and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insertion that are traditionally managed nonoperatively with immobilization. HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 fractures do not carry a significant risk of associated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221099572 |
_version_ | 1784721095838924800 |
---|---|
author | Shimberg, Jilan L. Leska, Tomasina M. Cruz, Aristides I. Ellis, Henry B. Patel, Neeraj M. Yen, Yi-Meng Schmale, Gregory A. Mistovich, R. Justin Fabricant, Peter D. Ganley, Theodore J. Green, Daniel W. Johnson, Benjamin Kushare, Indranil Lee, R. Jay McKay, Scott D. Milbrandt, Todd A. Rhodes, Jason Sachleben, Brant Traver, Jessica L. |
author_facet | Shimberg, Jilan L. Leska, Tomasina M. Cruz, Aristides I. Ellis, Henry B. Patel, Neeraj M. Yen, Yi-Meng Schmale, Gregory A. Mistovich, R. Justin Fabricant, Peter D. Ganley, Theodore J. Green, Daniel W. Johnson, Benjamin Kushare, Indranil Lee, R. Jay McKay, Scott D. Milbrandt, Todd A. Rhodes, Jason Sachleben, Brant Traver, Jessica L. |
author_sort | Shimberg, Jilan L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Type 1 tibial spine fractures are nondisplaced or ≤2 mm–displaced fractures of the tibial eminence and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insertion that are traditionally managed nonoperatively with immobilization. HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 fractures do not carry a significant risk of associated injuries and therefore do not require advanced imaging or additional interventions aside from immobilization. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We reviewed 52 patients who were classified by their treating institution with type 1 tibial spine fractures. Patients aged ≤18 years with pretreatment plain radiographs and ≤ 1 year of follow-up were included. Pretreatment imaging was reviewed by 4 authors to assess classification agreement among the treating institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups to ensure that outcomes represented classic type 1 fracture patterns. Any patient with universal agreement among the 4 authors that the fracture did not appear consistent with a type 1 classification were assigned to the type 1+ (T1+) group; all other patients were assigned to the true type 1 (TT1) group. We evaluated the rates of pretreatment imaging, concomitant injuries, and need for operative interventions as well as treatment outcomes overall and for each group independently. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients met inclusion criteria; 40 were in the TT1 group, while 8 were in the T1+ group, indicating less than universal agreement in the classification of these fractures. Overall, 12 (25%) underwent surgical treatment, and 12 (25%) had concomitant injuries. Also, 8 patients required additional surgical management including ACL reconstruction (n = 4), lateral meniscal repair (n = 2), lateral meniscectomy (n = 1), freeing an incarcerated medial meniscus (n = 1), and medial meniscectomy (n = 1). CONCLUSION: The classification of type 1 fractures can be challenging. Contrary to prior thought, a substantial number of patients with these fractures (>20%) were found to have concomitant injuries. Overall, surgical management was performed in 25% of patients in our cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9168882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91688822022-06-07 Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1 Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research Interest Group Shimberg, Jilan L. Leska, Tomasina M. Cruz, Aristides I. Ellis, Henry B. Patel, Neeraj M. Yen, Yi-Meng Schmale, Gregory A. Mistovich, R. Justin Fabricant, Peter D. Ganley, Theodore J. Green, Daniel W. Johnson, Benjamin Kushare, Indranil Lee, R. Jay McKay, Scott D. Milbrandt, Todd A. Rhodes, Jason Sachleben, Brant Traver, Jessica L. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Type 1 tibial spine fractures are nondisplaced or ≤2 mm–displaced fractures of the tibial eminence and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insertion that are traditionally managed nonoperatively with immobilization. HYPOTHESIS: Type 1 fractures do not carry a significant risk of associated injuries and therefore do not require advanced imaging or additional interventions aside from immobilization. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We reviewed 52 patients who were classified by their treating institution with type 1 tibial spine fractures. Patients aged ≤18 years with pretreatment plain radiographs and ≤ 1 year of follow-up were included. Pretreatment imaging was reviewed by 4 authors to assess classification agreement among the treating institutions. Patients were categorized into 2 groups to ensure that outcomes represented classic type 1 fracture patterns. Any patient with universal agreement among the 4 authors that the fracture did not appear consistent with a type 1 classification were assigned to the type 1+ (T1+) group; all other patients were assigned to the true type 1 (TT1) group. We evaluated the rates of pretreatment imaging, concomitant injuries, and need for operative interventions as well as treatment outcomes overall and for each group independently. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients met inclusion criteria; 40 were in the TT1 group, while 8 were in the T1+ group, indicating less than universal agreement in the classification of these fractures. Overall, 12 (25%) underwent surgical treatment, and 12 (25%) had concomitant injuries. Also, 8 patients required additional surgical management including ACL reconstruction (n = 4), lateral meniscal repair (n = 2), lateral meniscectomy (n = 1), freeing an incarcerated medial meniscus (n = 1), and medial meniscectomy (n = 1). CONCLUSION: The classification of type 1 fractures can be challenging. Contrary to prior thought, a substantial number of patients with these fractures (>20%) were found to have concomitant injuries. Overall, surgical management was performed in 25% of patients in our cohort. SAGE Publications 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9168882/ /pubmed/35677019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221099572 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Shimberg, Jilan L. Leska, Tomasina M. Cruz, Aristides I. Ellis, Henry B. Patel, Neeraj M. Yen, Yi-Meng Schmale, Gregory A. Mistovich, R. Justin Fabricant, Peter D. Ganley, Theodore J. Green, Daniel W. Johnson, Benjamin Kushare, Indranil Lee, R. Jay McKay, Scott D. Milbrandt, Todd A. Rhodes, Jason Sachleben, Brant Traver, Jessica L. Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1 Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research Interest Group |
title | Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1
Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research
Interest Group |
title_full | Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1
Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research
Interest Group |
title_fullStr | Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1
Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research
Interest Group |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1
Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research
Interest Group |
title_short | Is Nonoperative Treatment Appropriate for All Patients With Type 1
Tibial Spine Fractures? A Multicenter Study of the Tibial Spine Research
Interest Group |
title_sort | is nonoperative treatment appropriate for all patients with type 1
tibial spine fractures? a multicenter study of the tibial spine research
interest group |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671221099572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimbergjilanl isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT leskatomasinam isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT cruzaristidesi isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT ellishenryb isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT patelneerajm isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT yenyimeng isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT schmalegregorya isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT mistovichrjustin isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT fabricantpeterd isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT ganleytheodorej isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT greendanielw isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT johnsonbenjamin isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT kushareindranil isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT leerjay isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT mckayscottd isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT milbrandttodda isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT rhodesjason isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT sachlebenbrant isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup AT traverjessical isnonoperativetreatmentappropriateforallpatientswithtype1tibialspinefracturesamulticenterstudyofthetibialspineresearchinterestgroup |