Cargando…

Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the incidence rate of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in patients with acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from 2000 to September 2021. Two authors inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dahmen, Jari, Jaddi, Sohaib, Hagemeijer, Noortje C., Lubberts, Bart, Sierevelt, Inger N., Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S., d’Hooghe, Pieter, Kennedy, John G., Calder, James D. F., DiGiovanni, Christopher W., Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221102569
_version_ 1784721096890646528
author Dahmen, Jari
Jaddi, Sohaib
Hagemeijer, Noortje C.
Lubberts, Bart
Sierevelt, Inger N.
Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S.
d’Hooghe, Pieter
Kennedy, John G.
Calder, James D. F.
DiGiovanni, Christopher W.
Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
author_facet Dahmen, Jari
Jaddi, Sohaib
Hagemeijer, Noortje C.
Lubberts, Bart
Sierevelt, Inger N.
Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S.
d’Hooghe, Pieter
Kennedy, John G.
Calder, James D. F.
DiGiovanni, Christopher W.
Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
author_sort Dahmen, Jari
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the incidence rate of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in patients with acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from 2000 to September 2021. Two authors independently screened the search results, and risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria. Studies on acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries with pre-operative or intra-operative imaging were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in combined and separate groups of acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries. Secondary outcomes were anatomic distribution and mean size of the (osteo)chondral lesions. RESULTS: Nine articles (402 syndesmotic injuries) were included in the final analysis. Overall (osteo)chondral lesion incidence was 20.7% (95% CI: 13.7%-29.9%). This rate was 22.0% (95% CI: 17.1-27.7) and 24.1% (95% CI: 15.6-35.2) for acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries, respectively. In the combined acute and chronic syndesmotic injury group, 95.4% of the lesions were located on the talar dome and 4.5% of the lesions were located on the distal tibia. (Osteo)chondral lesion size was not reported in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle are present in 21% of the patients with isolated syndesmotic injuries. No difference in incidence rate was found between the different syndesmotic injury types and it can be concluded that the majority of lesions are located on the talar dome. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020176641
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9168886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91688862022-06-08 Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Dahmen, Jari Jaddi, Sohaib Hagemeijer, Noortje C. Lubberts, Bart Sierevelt, Inger N. Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S. d’Hooghe, Pieter Kennedy, John G. Calder, James D. F. DiGiovanni, Christopher W. Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J. Cartilage Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the incidence rate of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in patients with acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from 2000 to September 2021. Two authors independently screened the search results, and risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria. Studies on acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries with pre-operative or intra-operative imaging were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in combined and separate groups of acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries. Secondary outcomes were anatomic distribution and mean size of the (osteo)chondral lesions. RESULTS: Nine articles (402 syndesmotic injuries) were included in the final analysis. Overall (osteo)chondral lesion incidence was 20.7% (95% CI: 13.7%-29.9%). This rate was 22.0% (95% CI: 17.1-27.7) and 24.1% (95% CI: 15.6-35.2) for acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries, respectively. In the combined acute and chronic syndesmotic injury group, 95.4% of the lesions were located on the talar dome and 4.5% of the lesions were located on the distal tibia. (Osteo)chondral lesion size was not reported in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle are present in 21% of the patients with isolated syndesmotic injuries. No difference in incidence rate was found between the different syndesmotic injury types and it can be concluded that the majority of lesions are located on the talar dome. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020176641 SAGE Publications 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9168886/ /pubmed/35657299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221102569 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Dahmen, Jari
Jaddi, Sohaib
Hagemeijer, Noortje C.
Lubberts, Bart
Sierevelt, Inger N.
Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S.
d’Hooghe, Pieter
Kennedy, John G.
Calder, James D. F.
DiGiovanni, Christopher W.
Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort incidence of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in isolated syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221102569
work_keys_str_mv AT dahmenjari incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jaddisohaib incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hagemeijernoortjec incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lubbertsbart incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT siereveltingern incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT stufkenssjoerdas incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dhooghepieter incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kennedyjohng incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT calderjamesdf incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT digiovannichristopherw incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kerkhoffsginommj incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis