Cargando…
Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the incidence rate of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in patients with acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from 2000 to September 2021. Two authors inde...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221102569 |
_version_ | 1784721096890646528 |
---|---|
author | Dahmen, Jari Jaddi, Sohaib Hagemeijer, Noortje C. Lubberts, Bart Sierevelt, Inger N. Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S. d’Hooghe, Pieter Kennedy, John G. Calder, James D. F. DiGiovanni, Christopher W. Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J. |
author_facet | Dahmen, Jari Jaddi, Sohaib Hagemeijer, Noortje C. Lubberts, Bart Sierevelt, Inger N. Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S. d’Hooghe, Pieter Kennedy, John G. Calder, James D. F. DiGiovanni, Christopher W. Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J. |
author_sort | Dahmen, Jari |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the incidence rate of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in patients with acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from 2000 to September 2021. Two authors independently screened the search results, and risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria. Studies on acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries with pre-operative or intra-operative imaging were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in combined and separate groups of acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries. Secondary outcomes were anatomic distribution and mean size of the (osteo)chondral lesions. RESULTS: Nine articles (402 syndesmotic injuries) were included in the final analysis. Overall (osteo)chondral lesion incidence was 20.7% (95% CI: 13.7%-29.9%). This rate was 22.0% (95% CI: 17.1-27.7) and 24.1% (95% CI: 15.6-35.2) for acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries, respectively. In the combined acute and chronic syndesmotic injury group, 95.4% of the lesions were located on the talar dome and 4.5% of the lesions were located on the distal tibia. (Osteo)chondral lesion size was not reported in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle are present in 21% of the patients with isolated syndesmotic injuries. No difference in incidence rate was found between the different syndesmotic injury types and it can be concluded that the majority of lesions are located on the talar dome. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020176641 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9168886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91688862022-06-08 Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Dahmen, Jari Jaddi, Sohaib Hagemeijer, Noortje C. Lubberts, Bart Sierevelt, Inger N. Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S. d’Hooghe, Pieter Kennedy, John G. Calder, James D. F. DiGiovanni, Christopher W. Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J. Cartilage Original Article OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the incidence rate of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in patients with acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries. DESIGN: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE (Ovid) databases from 2000 to September 2021. Two authors independently screened the search results, and risk of bias was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) criteria. Studies on acute and chronic isolated syndesmotic injuries with pre-operative or intra-operative imaging were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in combined and separate groups of acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries. Secondary outcomes were anatomic distribution and mean size of the (osteo)chondral lesions. RESULTS: Nine articles (402 syndesmotic injuries) were included in the final analysis. Overall (osteo)chondral lesion incidence was 20.7% (95% CI: 13.7%-29.9%). This rate was 22.0% (95% CI: 17.1-27.7) and 24.1% (95% CI: 15.6-35.2) for acute and chronic syndesmotic injuries, respectively. In the combined acute and chronic syndesmotic injury group, 95.4% of the lesions were located on the talar dome and 4.5% of the lesions were located on the distal tibia. (Osteo)chondral lesion size was not reported in any of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle are present in 21% of the patients with isolated syndesmotic injuries. No difference in incidence rate was found between the different syndesmotic injury types and it can be concluded that the majority of lesions are located on the talar dome. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020176641 SAGE Publications 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9168886/ /pubmed/35657299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221102569 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dahmen, Jari Jaddi, Sohaib Hagemeijer, Noortje C. Lubberts, Bart Sierevelt, Inger N. Stufkens, Sjoerd A.S. d’Hooghe, Pieter Kennedy, John G. Calder, James D. F. DiGiovanni, Christopher W. Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J. Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated
Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated
Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated
Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated
Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Incidence of (Osteo)Chondral Lesions of the Ankle in Isolated
Syndesmotic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | incidence of (osteo)chondral lesions of the ankle in isolated
syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19476035221102569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dahmenjari incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jaddisohaib incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hagemeijernoortjec incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lubbertsbart incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT siereveltingern incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT stufkenssjoerdas incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dhooghepieter incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kennedyjohng incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT calderjamesdf incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT digiovannichristopherw incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kerkhoffsginommj incidenceofosteochondrallesionsoftheankleinisolatedsyndesmoticinjuriesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |