Cargando…

The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs

The unpredictable nature of seizures is challenging for caregivers of epileptic dogs, which calls the need for other management strategies such as seizure detection devices. Seizure detection devices are systems that rely on non-electroencephalographic (non-EEG) ictal changes, designed to detect sei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bongers, Jos, Gutierrez-Quintana, Rodrigo, Stalin, Catherine Elizabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677934
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.896030
_version_ 1784721100384501760
author Bongers, Jos
Gutierrez-Quintana, Rodrigo
Stalin, Catherine Elizabeth
author_facet Bongers, Jos
Gutierrez-Quintana, Rodrigo
Stalin, Catherine Elizabeth
author_sort Bongers, Jos
collection PubMed
description The unpredictable nature of seizures is challenging for caregivers of epileptic dogs, which calls the need for other management strategies such as seizure detection devices. Seizure detection devices are systems that rely on non-electroencephalographic (non-EEG) ictal changes, designed to detect seizures. The aim for its use in dogs would be to provide owners with a more complete history of their dog's seizures and to help install prompt (and potentially life-saving) intervention. Although seizure detection via wearable intracranial EEG recordings is associated with a higher sensitivity in humans, there is robust evidence for reliable detection of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) using non-EEG devices. Promising non-EEG changes described in epileptic humans, include heart rate variability (HRV), accelerometry (ACM), electrodermal activity (EDA), and electromyography (EMG). Their sensitivity and false detection rate to detect seizures vary, however direct comparison of studies is nearly impossible, as there are many differences in study design and standards for testing. A way to improve sensitivity and decrease false-positive alarms is to combine the different parameters thereby profiting from the strengths of each one. Given the challenges of using EEG in veterinary clinical practice, non-EEG ictal changes could be a promising alternative to monitor seizures more objectively. This review summarizes various seizure detection devices described in the human literature, discusses their potential use and limitations in veterinary medicine and describes what is currently known in the veterinary literature.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9168902
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91689022022-06-07 The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs Bongers, Jos Gutierrez-Quintana, Rodrigo Stalin, Catherine Elizabeth Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science The unpredictable nature of seizures is challenging for caregivers of epileptic dogs, which calls the need for other management strategies such as seizure detection devices. Seizure detection devices are systems that rely on non-electroencephalographic (non-EEG) ictal changes, designed to detect seizures. The aim for its use in dogs would be to provide owners with a more complete history of their dog's seizures and to help install prompt (and potentially life-saving) intervention. Although seizure detection via wearable intracranial EEG recordings is associated with a higher sensitivity in humans, there is robust evidence for reliable detection of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) using non-EEG devices. Promising non-EEG changes described in epileptic humans, include heart rate variability (HRV), accelerometry (ACM), electrodermal activity (EDA), and electromyography (EMG). Their sensitivity and false detection rate to detect seizures vary, however direct comparison of studies is nearly impossible, as there are many differences in study design and standards for testing. A way to improve sensitivity and decrease false-positive alarms is to combine the different parameters thereby profiting from the strengths of each one. Given the challenges of using EEG in veterinary clinical practice, non-EEG ictal changes could be a promising alternative to monitor seizures more objectively. This review summarizes various seizure detection devices described in the human literature, discusses their potential use and limitations in veterinary medicine and describes what is currently known in the veterinary literature. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9168902/ /pubmed/35677934 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.896030 Text en Copyright © 2022 Bongers, Gutierrez-Quintana and Stalin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Bongers, Jos
Gutierrez-Quintana, Rodrigo
Stalin, Catherine Elizabeth
The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs
title The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs
title_full The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs
title_fullStr The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs
title_full_unstemmed The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs
title_short The Prospects of Non-EEG Seizure Detection Devices in Dogs
title_sort prospects of non-eeg seizure detection devices in dogs
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9168902/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677934
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.896030
work_keys_str_mv AT bongersjos theprospectsofnoneegseizuredetectiondevicesindogs
AT gutierrezquintanarodrigo theprospectsofnoneegseizuredetectiondevicesindogs
AT stalincatherineelizabeth theprospectsofnoneegseizuredetectiondevicesindogs
AT bongersjos prospectsofnoneegseizuredetectiondevicesindogs
AT gutierrezquintanarodrigo prospectsofnoneegseizuredetectiondevicesindogs
AT stalincatherineelizabeth prospectsofnoneegseizuredetectiondevicesindogs