Cargando…

Differential expression and analysis of extrachromosomal circular DNAs as serum biomarkers in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: Extrachromosomal circular DNAs (eccDNAs) increase the number of proto‐oncogenes by enhancing oncogene expression to promote tumorigenesis. However, there are limited reports on differential eccDNA expression and analysis in lung cancer, especially in lung adenocarcinoma (LAD). METHODS: T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Gang, Shi, Wenjing, Ling, Liqun, Li, Changhong, Shao, Fanggui, Chen, Jie, Wang, Yumin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9169211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35441736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24425
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Extrachromosomal circular DNAs (eccDNAs) increase the number of proto‐oncogenes by enhancing oncogene expression to promote tumorigenesis. However, there are limited reports on differential eccDNA expression and analysis in lung cancer, especially in lung adenocarcinoma (LAD). METHODS: Three LAD and three corresponding NT tissues samples were used for eccDNA next‐generation sequencing analysis, and an additional 20 were used for quantitative PCR (qPCR) evaluations. We further performed qPCR amplification using serum samples from LAD patients and healthy medical examiners. RESULTS: eccDNAs from LAD samples were mainly 200–1000 bp in length. Gene annotation analysis revealed that most eccDNAs were derived from chromosomes 1 and 2. The top‐ten increased and top‐ten decreased eccDNAs in LAD tissues were CircD‐ARPC1B, CircD‐ARPC1A, CircD‐FAM49B, CircD‐SDK1, CircD‐KCNG1, CircD‐POLR2F, CircD‐SS18L1, CircD‐SLC16A3, CircD‐CSNK1D, CircD‐KCTD1, and CircD‐TMIGD2, CircD‐PDIA5, CircD‐VAV2, CircD‐GATAD2A, CircD‐CAB39L, CircD‐KHDC1, CircD‐FOXN3, CircD‐SULT2B1, CircD‐DPP9, and CircD‐CSNK1D. qPCR demonstrated that the expression of CircD‐DZRN3 was higher in LAD tissues than in normal lung tissues, whereas CircD‐LGR6 and CircD‐UMODL1 expression levels were lower in LAD than in normal lung tissues. Furthermore, the serum CircD‐PDZRN3 level increased, while CircD‐LGR6 decreased in LAD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that area under curve (AUC) of serum CircD‐PDZRN3 (0.991), CircD‐LGR6 (0.916) was higher than that of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) (0.825), CY211 (cytokeratin 19 fragment) (0.842), SCCA(squamous cell carcinoma antigen) (0.857) for the diagnosis of LAD. CONCLUSIONS: Our study first showed that several eccDNAs were aberrantly expressed in LAD, among which CircD‐PDZRN3 and CircD‐LGR6 clearly distinguished LAD patients from healthy controls, indicating their potential as biomarkers.