Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of repeated hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary recurrent liver cancer: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Since there is still controversy about the comparison of the efficacy and safety of RH and RFA in the treatment of recurrent liver cancer, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety, in order to provide evidence-based evidence for future research and clinical treatme...
Autores principales: | Chen, Zhichao, Wang, Jiefang, Lin, Yonghua |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9169306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02649-4 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Meta-Analysis of Repeat Hepatectomy versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
por: Machairas, Nikolaos, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy
por: Fan, Xiao-xiang, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Radiofrequency ablation versus repeat hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma in subcapsular location: a retrospective cohort study
por: Wei, Fuqun, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Efficacy and safety of repeated use of lusutrombopag prior to radiofrequency ablation in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma and thrombocytopenia
por: Ishikawa, Toru, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Comparison of Open versus Laparoscopic Approaches in Salvage Hepatectomy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Radiofrequency Ablation
por: Park, Yeshong, et al.
Publicado: (2023)