Cargando…

Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review

Today, the ability of the organizations to successfully knowledge management and sharing can help them in better performance. Effective knowledge sharing (KS) in the clinical context provides better clinical decisions and improves the quality of care services. This systematic review will be conducte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazaheri, Elaheh, Samouei, Rahele, Alavi, Mousa, Kelishadi, Roya, Ashrafi-rizi, Hasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677256
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_21
_version_ 1784721363472220160
author Mazaheri, Elaheh
Samouei, Rahele
Alavi, Mousa
Kelishadi, Roya
Ashrafi-rizi, Hasan
author_facet Mazaheri, Elaheh
Samouei, Rahele
Alavi, Mousa
Kelishadi, Roya
Ashrafi-rizi, Hasan
author_sort Mazaheri, Elaheh
collection PubMed
description Today, the ability of the organizations to successfully knowledge management and sharing can help them in better performance. Effective knowledge sharing (KS) in the clinical context provides better clinical decisions and improves the quality of care services. This systematic review will be conducted to identify the factors related to the clinical KS (CKS). This systematic literature review will be conducted to search the published documents about the affecting factors on the (clinical) KS. To this end, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane, Embase, SID, Magiran, IranDoc, and ISC will be thoroughly assessed with considered keywords and search strategy. No time limit will be considered and all relevant documents published will be evaluated until the start date of the search. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review study has been conducted on the factors related to CKS and our research will try to comprehensively extract the effective factors in this topic. Identifying the factors affecting CKS will lead to transparency in the exchange and interpretation of clinical knowledge in clinical care delivery and making the best clinical decisions as well as improving the quality of clinical care. It will also provide a condition to facilitate the delivery of more effective clinical education for policymakers in the field of clinical education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9170196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91701962022-06-07 Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review Mazaheri, Elaheh Samouei, Rahele Alavi, Mousa Kelishadi, Roya Ashrafi-rizi, Hasan J Educ Health Promot Review Article Today, the ability of the organizations to successfully knowledge management and sharing can help them in better performance. Effective knowledge sharing (KS) in the clinical context provides better clinical decisions and improves the quality of care services. This systematic review will be conducted to identify the factors related to the clinical KS (CKS). This systematic literature review will be conducted to search the published documents about the affecting factors on the (clinical) KS. To this end, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, Cochrane, Embase, SID, Magiran, IranDoc, and ISC will be thoroughly assessed with considered keywords and search strategy. No time limit will be considered and all relevant documents published will be evaluated until the start date of the search. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review study has been conducted on the factors related to CKS and our research will try to comprehensively extract the effective factors in this topic. Identifying the factors affecting CKS will lead to transparency in the exchange and interpretation of clinical knowledge in clinical care delivery and making the best clinical decisions as well as improving the quality of clinical care. It will also provide a condition to facilitate the delivery of more effective clinical education for policymakers in the field of clinical education. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9170196/ /pubmed/35677256 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Education and Health Promotion https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Mazaheri, Elaheh
Samouei, Rahele
Alavi, Mousa
Kelishadi, Roya
Ashrafi-rizi, Hasan
Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review
title Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review
title_full Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review
title_fullStr Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review
title_short Identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: A protocol for systematic review
title_sort identification of the factors related to the clinical knowledge sharing: a protocol for systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677256
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1287_21
work_keys_str_mv AT mazaherielaheh identificationofthefactorsrelatedtotheclinicalknowledgesharingaprotocolforsystematicreview
AT samoueirahele identificationofthefactorsrelatedtotheclinicalknowledgesharingaprotocolforsystematicreview
AT alavimousa identificationofthefactorsrelatedtotheclinicalknowledgesharingaprotocolforsystematicreview
AT kelishadiroya identificationofthefactorsrelatedtotheclinicalknowledgesharingaprotocolforsystematicreview
AT ashrafirizihasan identificationofthefactorsrelatedtotheclinicalknowledgesharingaprotocolforsystematicreview