Cargando…
Validity of continuous glucose monitoring for categorizing glycemic responses to diet: implications for use in personalized nutrition
BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) devices enable characterization of individuals’ glycemic variation. However, there are concerns about their reliability for categorizing glycemic responses to foods that would limit their potential application in personalized nutrition recommendations. OB...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35134821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac026 |
_version_ | 1784721433627197440 |
---|---|
author | Merino, Jordi Linenberg, Inbar Bermingham, Kate M Ganesh, Sajaysurya Bakker, Elco Delahanty, Linda M Chan, Andrew T Capdevila Pujol, Joan Wolf, Jonathan Al Khatib, Haya Franks, Paul W Spector, Tim D Ordovas, Jose M Berry, Sarah E Valdes, Ana M |
author_facet | Merino, Jordi Linenberg, Inbar Bermingham, Kate M Ganesh, Sajaysurya Bakker, Elco Delahanty, Linda M Chan, Andrew T Capdevila Pujol, Joan Wolf, Jonathan Al Khatib, Haya Franks, Paul W Spector, Tim D Ordovas, Jose M Berry, Sarah E Valdes, Ana M |
author_sort | Merino, Jordi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) devices enable characterization of individuals’ glycemic variation. However, there are concerns about their reliability for categorizing glycemic responses to foods that would limit their potential application in personalized nutrition recommendations. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the concordance of 2 simultaneously worn CGM devices in measuring postprandial glycemic responses. METHODS: Within ZOE PREDICT (Personalised Responses to Dietary Composition Trial) 1, 394 participants wore 2 CGM devices simultaneously [n = 360 participants with 2 Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro (FSL) devices; n = 34 participants with both FSL and Dexcom G6] for ≤14 d while consuming standardized (n = 4457) and ad libitum (n = 5738) meals. We examined the CV and correlation of the incremental area under the glucose curve at 2 h (glucose(iAUC0–2 h)). Within-subject meal ranking was assessed using Kendall τ rank correlation. Concordance between paired devices in time in range according to the American Diabetes Association cutoffs (TIR(ADA)) and glucose variability (glucose CV) was also investigated. RESULTS: The CV of glucose(iAUC0–2 h) for standardized meals was 3.7% (IQR: 1.7%–7.1%) for intrabrand device and 12.5% (IQR: 5.1%–24.8%) for interbrand device comparisons. Similar estimates were observed for ad libitum meals, with intrabrand and interbrand device CVs of glucose(iAUC0–2 h) of 4.1% (IQR: 1.8%–7.1%) and 16.6% (IQR: 5.5%–30.7%), respectively. Kendall τ rank correlation showed glucose(iAUC0–2h)-derived meal rankings were agreeable between paired CGM devices (intrabrand: 0.9; IQR: 0.8–0.9; interbrand: 0.7; IQR: 0.5–0.8). Paired CGMs also showed strong concordance for TIR(ADA) with a intrabrand device CV of 4.8% (IQR: 1.9%–9.8%) and an interbrand device CV of 3.2% (IQR: 1.1%–6.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate strong concordance of CGM devices in monitoring glycemic responses and suggest their potential use in personalized nutrition. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03479866. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9170468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91704682022-06-08 Validity of continuous glucose monitoring for categorizing glycemic responses to diet: implications for use in personalized nutrition Merino, Jordi Linenberg, Inbar Bermingham, Kate M Ganesh, Sajaysurya Bakker, Elco Delahanty, Linda M Chan, Andrew T Capdevila Pujol, Joan Wolf, Jonathan Al Khatib, Haya Franks, Paul W Spector, Tim D Ordovas, Jose M Berry, Sarah E Valdes, Ana M Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitor (CGM) devices enable characterization of individuals’ glycemic variation. However, there are concerns about their reliability for categorizing glycemic responses to foods that would limit their potential application in personalized nutrition recommendations. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the concordance of 2 simultaneously worn CGM devices in measuring postprandial glycemic responses. METHODS: Within ZOE PREDICT (Personalised Responses to Dietary Composition Trial) 1, 394 participants wore 2 CGM devices simultaneously [n = 360 participants with 2 Abbott Freestyle Libre Pro (FSL) devices; n = 34 participants with both FSL and Dexcom G6] for ≤14 d while consuming standardized (n = 4457) and ad libitum (n = 5738) meals. We examined the CV and correlation of the incremental area under the glucose curve at 2 h (glucose(iAUC0–2 h)). Within-subject meal ranking was assessed using Kendall τ rank correlation. Concordance between paired devices in time in range according to the American Diabetes Association cutoffs (TIR(ADA)) and glucose variability (glucose CV) was also investigated. RESULTS: The CV of glucose(iAUC0–2 h) for standardized meals was 3.7% (IQR: 1.7%–7.1%) for intrabrand device and 12.5% (IQR: 5.1%–24.8%) for interbrand device comparisons. Similar estimates were observed for ad libitum meals, with intrabrand and interbrand device CVs of glucose(iAUC0–2 h) of 4.1% (IQR: 1.8%–7.1%) and 16.6% (IQR: 5.5%–30.7%), respectively. Kendall τ rank correlation showed glucose(iAUC0–2h)-derived meal rankings were agreeable between paired CGM devices (intrabrand: 0.9; IQR: 0.8–0.9; interbrand: 0.7; IQR: 0.5–0.8). Paired CGMs also showed strong concordance for TIR(ADA) with a intrabrand device CV of 4.8% (IQR: 1.9%–9.8%) and an interbrand device CV of 3.2% (IQR: 1.1%–6.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate strong concordance of CGM devices in monitoring glycemic responses and suggest their potential use in personalized nutrition. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03479866. Oxford University Press 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9170468/ /pubmed/35134821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac026 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Communications Merino, Jordi Linenberg, Inbar Bermingham, Kate M Ganesh, Sajaysurya Bakker, Elco Delahanty, Linda M Chan, Andrew T Capdevila Pujol, Joan Wolf, Jonathan Al Khatib, Haya Franks, Paul W Spector, Tim D Ordovas, Jose M Berry, Sarah E Valdes, Ana M Validity of continuous glucose monitoring for categorizing glycemic responses to diet: implications for use in personalized nutrition |
title | Validity of continuous glucose monitoring for categorizing glycemic responses to diet: implications for use in personalized nutrition |
title_full | Validity of continuous glucose monitoring for categorizing glycemic responses to diet: implications for use in personalized nutrition |
title_fullStr | Validity of continuous glucose monitoring for categorizing glycemic responses to diet: implications for use in personalized nutrition |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of continuous glucose monitoring for categorizing glycemic responses to diet: implications for use in personalized nutrition |
title_short | Validity of continuous glucose monitoring for categorizing glycemic responses to diet: implications for use in personalized nutrition |
title_sort | validity of continuous glucose monitoring for categorizing glycemic responses to diet: implications for use in personalized nutrition |
topic | Original Research Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35134821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqac026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT merinojordi validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT linenberginbar validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT berminghamkatem validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT ganeshsajaysurya validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT bakkerelco validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT delahantylindam validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT chanandrewt validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT capdevilapujoljoan validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT wolfjonathan validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT alkhatibhaya validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT frankspaulw validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT spectortimd validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT ordovasjosem validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT berrysarahe validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition AT valdesanam validityofcontinuousglucosemonitoringforcategorizingglycemicresponsestodietimplicationsforuseinpersonalizednutrition |