Cargando…

Technical note: A comparison between rehydrating solutions in the pretreatment of mummified and corified skin for forensic microscopic examination

Microscopic examination of mummified or corified skin may be of extreme importance for forensic purposes. However, standard histological samples in these cases are low-end, and preparation is burdened by several problems and so are diagnostic results: an improvement of these types of specimens is th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tambuzzi, Stefano, Gentile, Guendalina, Bilardo, Gianluigi, Boracchi, Michele, Bailo, Paolo, Casalino, Teresa, Andreola, Salvatore, Zoja, Riccardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02833-x
_version_ 1784721480189214720
author Tambuzzi, Stefano
Gentile, Guendalina
Bilardo, Gianluigi
Boracchi, Michele
Bailo, Paolo
Casalino, Teresa
Andreola, Salvatore
Zoja, Riccardo
author_facet Tambuzzi, Stefano
Gentile, Guendalina
Bilardo, Gianluigi
Boracchi, Michele
Bailo, Paolo
Casalino, Teresa
Andreola, Salvatore
Zoja, Riccardo
author_sort Tambuzzi, Stefano
collection PubMed
description Microscopic examination of mummified or corified skin may be of extreme importance for forensic purposes. However, standard histological samples in these cases are low-end, and preparation is burdened by several problems and so are diagnostic results: an improvement of these types of specimens is therefore advantageous. This study aims to identify the best performing rehydration solution among a fabric softener, a body lotion, and Sandison’s rehydrating solution. Samples of skin undergoing mummification or corification were collected from 25 corpses and each sample was divided into 4 fragments: one of these fragments was directly fixated in 4% formalin, one was previously treated with a tissue softener, another one was previously treated with a body lotion, and the last one was treated with Sandison’s solution. After 72 h, the pretreated samples were post-fixated in 4% formalin and then prepared for standard histological examination staining the histological slides with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson’s trichrome. At the microscopic examination, samples directly fixated in formalin were characterized by usual marked structural alterations and altered stainability, typical of such dry tissues. Vice versa, those previously treated appeared to be better-preserved even though with different improvement levels: body lotion made a medium–low-grade restoration of the tissues, and fabric softener a high-grade restoration, while Sandison’s rehydrating solution produced an optimal grade restoration. Sandison’s rehydrating solution was confirmed to be the best rehydrating substance for mummified and corified skin. Fabric softener could be, however, considered a valid substitute, being productive of high-grade microscopic yield.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9170645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91706452022-06-08 Technical note: A comparison between rehydrating solutions in the pretreatment of mummified and corified skin for forensic microscopic examination Tambuzzi, Stefano Gentile, Guendalina Bilardo, Gianluigi Boracchi, Michele Bailo, Paolo Casalino, Teresa Andreola, Salvatore Zoja, Riccardo Int J Legal Med Method Paper Microscopic examination of mummified or corified skin may be of extreme importance for forensic purposes. However, standard histological samples in these cases are low-end, and preparation is burdened by several problems and so are diagnostic results: an improvement of these types of specimens is therefore advantageous. This study aims to identify the best performing rehydration solution among a fabric softener, a body lotion, and Sandison’s rehydrating solution. Samples of skin undergoing mummification or corification were collected from 25 corpses and each sample was divided into 4 fragments: one of these fragments was directly fixated in 4% formalin, one was previously treated with a tissue softener, another one was previously treated with a body lotion, and the last one was treated with Sandison’s solution. After 72 h, the pretreated samples were post-fixated in 4% formalin and then prepared for standard histological examination staining the histological slides with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson’s trichrome. At the microscopic examination, samples directly fixated in formalin were characterized by usual marked structural alterations and altered stainability, typical of such dry tissues. Vice versa, those previously treated appeared to be better-preserved even though with different improvement levels: body lotion made a medium–low-grade restoration of the tissues, and fabric softener a high-grade restoration, while Sandison’s rehydrating solution produced an optimal grade restoration. Sandison’s rehydrating solution was confirmed to be the best rehydrating substance for mummified and corified skin. Fabric softener could be, however, considered a valid substitute, being productive of high-grade microscopic yield. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-11 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9170645/ /pubmed/35543756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02833-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Method Paper
Tambuzzi, Stefano
Gentile, Guendalina
Bilardo, Gianluigi
Boracchi, Michele
Bailo, Paolo
Casalino, Teresa
Andreola, Salvatore
Zoja, Riccardo
Technical note: A comparison between rehydrating solutions in the pretreatment of mummified and corified skin for forensic microscopic examination
title Technical note: A comparison between rehydrating solutions in the pretreatment of mummified and corified skin for forensic microscopic examination
title_full Technical note: A comparison between rehydrating solutions in the pretreatment of mummified and corified skin for forensic microscopic examination
title_fullStr Technical note: A comparison between rehydrating solutions in the pretreatment of mummified and corified skin for forensic microscopic examination
title_full_unstemmed Technical note: A comparison between rehydrating solutions in the pretreatment of mummified and corified skin for forensic microscopic examination
title_short Technical note: A comparison between rehydrating solutions in the pretreatment of mummified and corified skin for forensic microscopic examination
title_sort technical note: a comparison between rehydrating solutions in the pretreatment of mummified and corified skin for forensic microscopic examination
topic Method Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-022-02833-x
work_keys_str_mv AT tambuzzistefano technicalnoteacomparisonbetweenrehydratingsolutionsinthepretreatmentofmummifiedandcorifiedskinforforensicmicroscopicexamination
AT gentileguendalina technicalnoteacomparisonbetweenrehydratingsolutionsinthepretreatmentofmummifiedandcorifiedskinforforensicmicroscopicexamination
AT bilardogianluigi technicalnoteacomparisonbetweenrehydratingsolutionsinthepretreatmentofmummifiedandcorifiedskinforforensicmicroscopicexamination
AT boracchimichele technicalnoteacomparisonbetweenrehydratingsolutionsinthepretreatmentofmummifiedandcorifiedskinforforensicmicroscopicexamination
AT bailopaolo technicalnoteacomparisonbetweenrehydratingsolutionsinthepretreatmentofmummifiedandcorifiedskinforforensicmicroscopicexamination
AT casalinoteresa technicalnoteacomparisonbetweenrehydratingsolutionsinthepretreatmentofmummifiedandcorifiedskinforforensicmicroscopicexamination
AT andreolasalvatore technicalnoteacomparisonbetweenrehydratingsolutionsinthepretreatmentofmummifiedandcorifiedskinforforensicmicroscopicexamination
AT zojariccardo technicalnoteacomparisonbetweenrehydratingsolutionsinthepretreatmentofmummifiedandcorifiedskinforforensicmicroscopicexamination