Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland
INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN + R) demonstrated prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in comparison to standard chemoimmunotherapy [bendamustine + rituximab (BR)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7 |
_version_ | 1784721481517760512 |
---|---|
author | Barbier, Michaela Durno, Nicholas Bennison, Craig Örtli, Mathias Knapp, Christian Schwenkglenks, Matthias |
author_facet | Barbier, Michaela Durno, Nicholas Bennison, Craig Örtli, Mathias Knapp, Christian Schwenkglenks, Matthias |
author_sort | Barbier, Michaela |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN + R) demonstrated prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in comparison to standard chemoimmunotherapy [bendamustine + rituximab (BR)]. We conducted a cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis comparing VEN + R versus six comparators from the Swiss healthcare payer perspective. METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model, developed in accordance with NICE and ISPOR decision modelling guidelines, was adapted to Switzerland. Model inputs were informed by the MURANO trial (survival data, patient characteristics), publicly available Swiss sources (drug prices, inpatient and outpatient costs), Swiss National Institute of Cancer Epidemiology and Registration data (incidence and prevalence values), and Swiss medical expert feedback. We used published (dis-)utility values and adverse event probabilities. RESULTS: Over a lifetime, VEN + R resulted in an expected gain of 2.60 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient and incremental costs of Swiss Francs (CHF) 147,851 compared to BR, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 56,881/QALY gained. Other treatment strategies (for example ibrutinib versus VEN + R) resulted in higher costs and lower QALYs. Results were not different for subgroups of patients with/without deletion of chromosome 17p/tumour protein 53 mutation. In scenario analysis, changes in post-progression treatment costs demonstrated a high impact on results. We estimated an expected value of perfect information of CHF 3,318/patient. A moderate VEN + R uptake was estimated to save CHF 12.3 million during 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using a threshold of CHF 100,000 per QALY, VEN + R was projected to be cost-effective vs BR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9170651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91706512022-06-08 Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland Barbier, Michaela Durno, Nicholas Bennison, Craig Örtli, Mathias Knapp, Christian Schwenkglenks, Matthias Eur J Health Econ Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN + R) demonstrated prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in comparison to standard chemoimmunotherapy [bendamustine + rituximab (BR)]. We conducted a cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis comparing VEN + R versus six comparators from the Swiss healthcare payer perspective. METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model, developed in accordance with NICE and ISPOR decision modelling guidelines, was adapted to Switzerland. Model inputs were informed by the MURANO trial (survival data, patient characteristics), publicly available Swiss sources (drug prices, inpatient and outpatient costs), Swiss National Institute of Cancer Epidemiology and Registration data (incidence and prevalence values), and Swiss medical expert feedback. We used published (dis-)utility values and adverse event probabilities. RESULTS: Over a lifetime, VEN + R resulted in an expected gain of 2.60 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient and incremental costs of Swiss Francs (CHF) 147,851 compared to BR, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 56,881/QALY gained. Other treatment strategies (for example ibrutinib versus VEN + R) resulted in higher costs and lower QALYs. Results were not different for subgroups of patients with/without deletion of chromosome 17p/tumour protein 53 mutation. In scenario analysis, changes in post-progression treatment costs demonstrated a high impact on results. We estimated an expected value of perfect information of CHF 3,318/patient. A moderate VEN + R uptake was estimated to save CHF 12.3 million during 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using a threshold of CHF 100,000 per QALY, VEN + R was projected to be cost-effective vs BR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9170651/ /pubmed/34757508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Barbier, Michaela Durno, Nicholas Bennison, Craig Örtli, Mathias Knapp, Christian Schwenkglenks, Matthias Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland |
title | Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in switzerland |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barbiermichaela costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland AT durnonicholas costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland AT bennisoncraig costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland AT ortlimathias costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland AT knappchristian costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland AT schwenkglenksmatthias costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland |