Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland

INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN + R) demonstrated prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in comparison to standard chemoimmunotherapy [bendamustine + rituximab (BR)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barbier, Michaela, Durno, Nicholas, Bennison, Craig, Örtli, Mathias, Knapp, Christian, Schwenkglenks, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7
_version_ 1784721481517760512
author Barbier, Michaela
Durno, Nicholas
Bennison, Craig
Örtli, Mathias
Knapp, Christian
Schwenkglenks, Matthias
author_facet Barbier, Michaela
Durno, Nicholas
Bennison, Craig
Örtli, Mathias
Knapp, Christian
Schwenkglenks, Matthias
author_sort Barbier, Michaela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN + R) demonstrated prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in comparison to standard chemoimmunotherapy [bendamustine + rituximab (BR)]. We conducted a cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis comparing VEN + R versus six comparators from the Swiss healthcare payer perspective. METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model, developed in accordance with NICE and ISPOR decision modelling guidelines, was adapted to Switzerland. Model inputs were informed by the MURANO trial (survival data, patient characteristics), publicly available Swiss sources (drug prices, inpatient and outpatient costs), Swiss National Institute of Cancer Epidemiology and Registration data (incidence and prevalence values), and Swiss medical expert feedback. We used published (dis-)utility values and adverse event probabilities. RESULTS: Over a lifetime, VEN + R resulted in an expected gain of 2.60 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient and incremental costs of Swiss Francs (CHF) 147,851 compared to BR, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 56,881/QALY gained. Other treatment strategies (for example ibrutinib versus VEN + R) resulted in higher costs and lower QALYs. Results were not different for subgroups of patients with/without deletion of chromosome 17p/tumour protein 53 mutation. In scenario analysis, changes in post-progression treatment costs demonstrated a high impact on results. We estimated an expected value of perfect information of CHF 3,318/patient. A moderate VEN + R uptake was estimated to save CHF 12.3 million during 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using a threshold of CHF 100,000 per QALY, VEN + R was projected to be cost-effective vs BR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9170651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91706512022-06-08 Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland Barbier, Michaela Durno, Nicholas Bennison, Craig Örtli, Mathias Knapp, Christian Schwenkglenks, Matthias Eur J Health Econ Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Venetoclax in combination with rituximab (VEN + R) demonstrated prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in comparison to standard chemoimmunotherapy [bendamustine + rituximab (BR)]. We conducted a cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis comparing VEN + R versus six comparators from the Swiss healthcare payer perspective. METHODS: A three-state partitioned survival model, developed in accordance with NICE and ISPOR decision modelling guidelines, was adapted to Switzerland. Model inputs were informed by the MURANO trial (survival data, patient characteristics), publicly available Swiss sources (drug prices, inpatient and outpatient costs), Swiss National Institute of Cancer Epidemiology and Registration data (incidence and prevalence values), and Swiss medical expert feedback. We used published (dis-)utility values and adverse event probabilities. RESULTS: Over a lifetime, VEN + R resulted in an expected gain of 2.60 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient and incremental costs of Swiss Francs (CHF) 147,851 compared to BR, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CHF 56,881/QALY gained. Other treatment strategies (for example ibrutinib versus VEN + R) resulted in higher costs and lower QALYs. Results were not different for subgroups of patients with/without deletion of chromosome 17p/tumour protein 53 mutation. In scenario analysis, changes in post-progression treatment costs demonstrated a high impact on results. We estimated an expected value of perfect information of CHF 3,318/patient. A moderate VEN + R uptake was estimated to save CHF 12.3 million during 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Using a threshold of CHF 100,000 per QALY, VEN + R was projected to be cost-effective vs BR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9170651/ /pubmed/34757508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Barbier, Michaela
Durno, Nicholas
Bennison, Craig
Örtli, Mathias
Knapp, Christian
Schwenkglenks, Matthias
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland
title Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland
title_full Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland
title_short Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Switzerland
title_sort cost-effectiveness and budget impact of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia in switzerland
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34757508
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01398-7
work_keys_str_mv AT barbiermichaela costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland
AT durnonicholas costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland
AT bennisoncraig costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland
AT ortlimathias costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland
AT knappchristian costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland
AT schwenkglenksmatthias costeffectivenessandbudgetimpactofvenetoclaxincombinationwithrituximabinrelapsedrefractorychroniclymphocyticleukemiainswitzerland