Cargando…
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease. METHODS: Single-institution retrospective analysis of 60 NSCLC patients with 62 discrete lesions treated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.870143 |
_version_ | 1784721559539154944 |
---|---|
author | Katz, Leah M. Ng, Victor Wu, S. Peter Yan, Sherry Grew, David Shin, Samuel Colangelo, Nicholas W. McCarthy, Allison Pass, Harvey I. Chachoua, Abraham Schiff, Peter B. |
author_facet | Katz, Leah M. Ng, Victor Wu, S. Peter Yan, Sherry Grew, David Shin, Samuel Colangelo, Nicholas W. McCarthy, Allison Pass, Harvey I. Chachoua, Abraham Schiff, Peter B. |
author_sort | Katz, Leah M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease. METHODS: Single-institution retrospective analysis of 60 NSCLC patients with 62 discrete lesions treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2017. Patients were stratified into three groups, including early stage, locally recurrent, and oligoprogressive disease. Group 1 included early stage local disease with no prior local therapy. Group 2 included locally recurrent disease after local treatment of a primary lesion, and group 3 included regional or well-controlled distant metastatic disease receiving SBRT for a treatment naive lung lesion (oligoprogressive disease). Patient/tumor characteristics and adverse effects were recorded. Local failure free survival (LFFS), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 34 months, 67% of the study population remained alive. The estimated 3-year LFFS for group 1, group 2, and group 3 patients was 95% (95% CI: 86%-100%), 82%(62% - 100%), and 83% (58-100%), respectively. The estimated 3-year PFS was 59% (42-83%), 40% (21%-78%), and 33% (12%-95%), and the estimated 3-year OS was 58% (41-82%), 60% (37-96%), and 58% (31-100%)), respectively for each group. When adjusted for age and size of lesion, no significant difference in OS, LFFS, and PFS emerged between groups (p > 0.05). No patients experienced grade 3 to 5 toxicity. Eighteen patients (29%) experienced grade 1 to 2 toxicity. The most common toxicities reported were cough and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrates control rates in group 1 patients comparable to historical controls. Our study also reveals comparable clinical results for SBRT in the treatment of NSCLC by demonstrating similar rates of LFFS and OS in group 2 and group 3 patients with locally recurrent and treatment naïve lung lesion with well-controlled distant metastatic disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9170989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91709892022-06-08 Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience Katz, Leah M. Ng, Victor Wu, S. Peter Yan, Sherry Grew, David Shin, Samuel Colangelo, Nicholas W. McCarthy, Allison Pass, Harvey I. Chachoua, Abraham Schiff, Peter B. Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease. METHODS: Single-institution retrospective analysis of 60 NSCLC patients with 62 discrete lesions treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2017. Patients were stratified into three groups, including early stage, locally recurrent, and oligoprogressive disease. Group 1 included early stage local disease with no prior local therapy. Group 2 included locally recurrent disease after local treatment of a primary lesion, and group 3 included regional or well-controlled distant metastatic disease receiving SBRT for a treatment naive lung lesion (oligoprogressive disease). Patient/tumor characteristics and adverse effects were recorded. Local failure free survival (LFFS), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 34 months, 67% of the study population remained alive. The estimated 3-year LFFS for group 1, group 2, and group 3 patients was 95% (95% CI: 86%-100%), 82%(62% - 100%), and 83% (58-100%), respectively. The estimated 3-year PFS was 59% (42-83%), 40% (21%-78%), and 33% (12%-95%), and the estimated 3-year OS was 58% (41-82%), 60% (37-96%), and 58% (31-100%)), respectively for each group. When adjusted for age and size of lesion, no significant difference in OS, LFFS, and PFS emerged between groups (p > 0.05). No patients experienced grade 3 to 5 toxicity. Eighteen patients (29%) experienced grade 1 to 2 toxicity. The most common toxicities reported were cough and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrates control rates in group 1 patients comparable to historical controls. Our study also reveals comparable clinical results for SBRT in the treatment of NSCLC by demonstrating similar rates of LFFS and OS in group 2 and group 3 patients with locally recurrent and treatment naïve lung lesion with well-controlled distant metastatic disease. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9170989/ /pubmed/35686111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.870143 Text en Copyright © 2022 Katz, Ng, Wu, Yan, Grew, Shin, Colangelo, McCarthy, Pass, Chachoua and Schiff https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Katz, Leah M. Ng, Victor Wu, S. Peter Yan, Sherry Grew, David Shin, Samuel Colangelo, Nicholas W. McCarthy, Allison Pass, Harvey I. Chachoua, Abraham Schiff, Peter B. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience |
title | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience |
title_full | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience |
title_short | Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Recurrent and Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single Institution Experience |
title_sort | stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of locally recurrent and oligoprogressive non-small cell lung cancer: a single institution experience |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9170989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.870143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katzleahm stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT ngvictor stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT wuspeter stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT yansherry stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT grewdavid stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT shinsamuel stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT colangelonicholasw stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT mccarthyallison stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT passharveyi stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT chachouaabraham stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience AT schiffpeterb stereotacticbodyradiationtherapyforthetreatmentoflocallyrecurrentandoligoprogressivenonsmallcelllungcancerasingleinstitutionexperience |