Cargando…
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
BACKGROUND: Healthcare requires patient feedback to improve outcomes and experience. This study undertook a systematic review of the depth, variability, and digital suitability of current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A PROSPE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac062 |
_version_ | 1784721562976387072 |
---|---|
author | Melly, Conor McGeehan, Gearoid O’Connor, Niall Johnston, Alison Bass, Gary Mohseni, Shahin Donohoe, Claire Bucholc, Magda Sugrue, Michael |
author_facet | Melly, Conor McGeehan, Gearoid O’Connor, Niall Johnston, Alison Bass, Gary Mohseni, Shahin Donohoe, Claire Bucholc, Magda Sugrue, Michael |
author_sort | Melly, Conor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthcare requires patient feedback to improve outcomes and experience. This study undertook a systematic review of the depth, variability, and digital suitability of current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A PROSPERO-registered (registration number CRD42021261707) systematic review was undertaken for all relevant English language articles using PubMed version of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases in June 2021. The search used Boolean operators and wildcards and included the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND patient outcome OR patient-reported outcome OR patient-reported outcome measure OR PRO OR PROM. Medical Subjects Heading terms were used to search PubMed and Scopus. Articles published from 1 January 2011 to 2 June 2021 were included. RESULTS: A total of 4960 individual articles were reviewed in this study, of which 44 were found to evaluate PROMs in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underwent methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) grading. Twenty-one articles spanning 19 countries and four continents met all inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative data synthesis. There was significant heterogeneity in PROMs identified with eight different comprehensive PROM tools used in the 21 studies. There was wide variation in the time points at which PROMs were recorded. Fourteen of 21 studies recorded PROMs before and after surgery, and 7 of 21 recorded PROMs only after surgery. Follow-up intervals ranged from 3 days to 2 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that while post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy PROMs are infrequently measured currently, tools are widely available to achieve this in clinical practice. PROMs may not capture all the outcomes but should be incorporated into future cholecystectomy outcome research. The EQ-5D™ (EuroQoL Group, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) provides a simple platform for the modern digital era. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9171002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91710022022-06-08 Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review Melly, Conor McGeehan, Gearoid O’Connor, Niall Johnston, Alison Bass, Gary Mohseni, Shahin Donohoe, Claire Bucholc, Magda Sugrue, Michael BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Healthcare requires patient feedback to improve outcomes and experience. This study undertook a systematic review of the depth, variability, and digital suitability of current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A PROSPERO-registered (registration number CRD42021261707) systematic review was undertaken for all relevant English language articles using PubMed version of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases in June 2021. The search used Boolean operators and wildcards and included the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND patient outcome OR patient-reported outcome OR patient-reported outcome measure OR PRO OR PROM. Medical Subjects Heading terms were used to search PubMed and Scopus. Articles published from 1 January 2011 to 2 June 2021 were included. RESULTS: A total of 4960 individual articles were reviewed in this study, of which 44 were found to evaluate PROMs in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underwent methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) grading. Twenty-one articles spanning 19 countries and four continents met all inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative data synthesis. There was significant heterogeneity in PROMs identified with eight different comprehensive PROM tools used in the 21 studies. There was wide variation in the time points at which PROMs were recorded. Fourteen of 21 studies recorded PROMs before and after surgery, and 7 of 21 recorded PROMs only after surgery. Follow-up intervals ranged from 3 days to 2 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that while post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy PROMs are infrequently measured currently, tools are widely available to achieve this in clinical practice. PROMs may not capture all the outcomes but should be incorporated into future cholecystectomy outcome research. The EQ-5D™ (EuroQoL Group, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) provides a simple platform for the modern digital era. Oxford University Press 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9171002/ /pubmed/35668711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac062 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Melly, Conor McGeehan, Gearoid O’Connor, Niall Johnston, Alison Bass, Gary Mohseni, Shahin Donohoe, Claire Bucholc, Magda Sugrue, Michael Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review |
title | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review |
title_full | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review |
title_short | Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review |
title_sort | patient-reported outcome measures (proms) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac062 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mellyconor patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview AT mcgeehangearoid patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview AT oconnorniall patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview AT johnstonalison patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview AT bassgary patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview AT mohsenishahin patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview AT donohoeclaire patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview AT bucholcmagda patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview AT sugruemichael patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview |