Cargando…

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review

BACKGROUND: Healthcare requires patient feedback to improve outcomes and experience. This study undertook a systematic review of the depth, variability, and digital suitability of current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A PROSPE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melly, Conor, McGeehan, Gearoid, O’Connor, Niall, Johnston, Alison, Bass, Gary, Mohseni, Shahin, Donohoe, Claire, Bucholc, Magda, Sugrue, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac062
_version_ 1784721562976387072
author Melly, Conor
McGeehan, Gearoid
O’Connor, Niall
Johnston, Alison
Bass, Gary
Mohseni, Shahin
Donohoe, Claire
Bucholc, Magda
Sugrue, Michael
author_facet Melly, Conor
McGeehan, Gearoid
O’Connor, Niall
Johnston, Alison
Bass, Gary
Mohseni, Shahin
Donohoe, Claire
Bucholc, Magda
Sugrue, Michael
author_sort Melly, Conor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare requires patient feedback to improve outcomes and experience. This study undertook a systematic review of the depth, variability, and digital suitability of current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A PROSPERO-registered (registration number CRD42021261707) systematic review was undertaken for all relevant English language articles using PubMed version of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases in June 2021. The search used Boolean operators and wildcards and included the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND patient outcome OR patient-reported outcome OR patient-reported outcome measure OR PRO OR PROM. Medical Subjects Heading terms were used to search PubMed and Scopus. Articles published from 1 January 2011 to 2 June 2021 were included. RESULTS: A total of 4960 individual articles were reviewed in this study, of which 44 were found to evaluate PROMs in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underwent methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) grading. Twenty-one articles spanning 19 countries and four continents met all inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative data synthesis. There was significant heterogeneity in PROMs identified with eight different comprehensive PROM tools used in the 21 studies. There was wide variation in the time points at which PROMs were recorded. Fourteen of 21 studies recorded PROMs before and after surgery, and 7 of 21 recorded PROMs only after surgery. Follow-up intervals ranged from 3 days to 2 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that while post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy PROMs are infrequently measured currently, tools are widely available to achieve this in clinical practice. PROMs may not capture all the outcomes but should be incorporated into future cholecystectomy outcome research. The EQ-5D™ (EuroQoL Group, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) provides a simple platform for the modern digital era.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9171002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91710022022-06-08 Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review Melly, Conor McGeehan, Gearoid O’Connor, Niall Johnston, Alison Bass, Gary Mohseni, Shahin Donohoe, Claire Bucholc, Magda Sugrue, Michael BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Healthcare requires patient feedback to improve outcomes and experience. This study undertook a systematic review of the depth, variability, and digital suitability of current patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODS: A PROSPERO-registered (registration number CRD42021261707) systematic review was undertaken for all relevant English language articles using PubMed version of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science electronic databases in June 2021. The search used Boolean operators and wildcards and included the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND patient outcome OR patient-reported outcome OR patient-reported outcome measure OR PRO OR PROM. Medical Subjects Heading terms were used to search PubMed and Scopus. Articles published from 1 January 2011 to 2 June 2021 were included. RESULTS: A total of 4960 individual articles were reviewed in this study, of which 44 were found to evaluate PROMs in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and underwent methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) grading. Twenty-one articles spanning 19 countries and four continents met all inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative data synthesis. There was significant heterogeneity in PROMs identified with eight different comprehensive PROM tools used in the 21 studies. There was wide variation in the time points at which PROMs were recorded. Fourteen of 21 studies recorded PROMs before and after surgery, and 7 of 21 recorded PROMs only after surgery. Follow-up intervals ranged from 3 days to 2 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified that while post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy PROMs are infrequently measured currently, tools are widely available to achieve this in clinical practice. PROMs may not capture all the outcomes but should be incorporated into future cholecystectomy outcome research. The EQ-5D™ (EuroQoL Group, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) provides a simple platform for the modern digital era. Oxford University Press 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9171002/ /pubmed/35668711 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac062 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Melly, Conor
McGeehan, Gearoid
O’Connor, Niall
Johnston, Alison
Bass, Gary
Mohseni, Shahin
Donohoe, Claire
Bucholc, Magda
Sugrue, Michael
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
title Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures (proms) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668711
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac062
work_keys_str_mv AT mellyconor patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview
AT mcgeehangearoid patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview
AT oconnorniall patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview
AT johnstonalison patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview
AT bassgary patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview
AT mohsenishahin patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview
AT donohoeclaire patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview
AT bucholcmagda patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview
AT sugruemichael patientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsafterlaparoscopiccholecystectomysystematicreview