Cargando…
Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a quality improvement (QI) package on patient satisfaction of perinatal care. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Participating hospitals were randomised by size into four different wedges. SETTING: 12 secondary-l...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35667734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054544 |
_version_ | 1784721618474369024 |
---|---|
author | Brunell, Olivia Chaulagain, Dipak KC, Ashish Bergström, Anna Målqvist, Mats |
author_facet | Brunell, Olivia Chaulagain, Dipak KC, Ashish Bergström, Anna Målqvist, Mats |
author_sort | Brunell, Olivia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a quality improvement (QI) package on patient satisfaction of perinatal care. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Participating hospitals were randomised by size into four different wedges. SETTING: 12 secondary-level public hospitals in Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth in the hospitals at a gestational age of ≥22 weeks, with fetal heart sound at admission. Adverse outcomes were excluded. One hospital was excluded due to data incompleteness and four low-volume hospitals due to large heterogeneity. The final analysis included 54 919 women. INTERVENTION: Hospital management was engaged and facilitators were recruited from within hospitals. Available perinatal care was assessed in each hospital, followed by a bottle-neck analysis workshop. A 3-day training in essential newborn care was carried out for health workers involved in perinatal care, and a set of QI tools were introduced to be used in everyday practice (skill-checks, self-assessment checklists, scoreboards and weekly Plan–Do–Study–Act meetings). Refresher training after 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURE: Women’s satisfaction with care during childbirth (a prespecified secondary outcome). RESULTS: The likelihood of women being overall satisfied with care during childbirth increased after the intervention (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.66, 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.73). However, the proportions of overall satisfaction were low (control 58%, intervention 62%). Women were more likely to be satisfied with education and information from health workers after intervention (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.40) and to have been treated with dignity and respect (aOR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.16). The likelihood of having experienced abuse during the hospital stay decreased (aOR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.51) and of being satisfied with the level of privacy increased (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in patient satisfaction were indicated after the introduction of a QI-package on perinatal care. We recommend further studies on which aspects of care are most important to improve women’s satisfaction of perinatal care in hospitals in Nepal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN30829654. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9171223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91712232022-06-16 Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial Brunell, Olivia Chaulagain, Dipak KC, Ashish Bergström, Anna Målqvist, Mats BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a quality improvement (QI) package on patient satisfaction of perinatal care. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Participating hospitals were randomised by size into four different wedges. SETTING: 12 secondary-level public hospitals in Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth in the hospitals at a gestational age of ≥22 weeks, with fetal heart sound at admission. Adverse outcomes were excluded. One hospital was excluded due to data incompleteness and four low-volume hospitals due to large heterogeneity. The final analysis included 54 919 women. INTERVENTION: Hospital management was engaged and facilitators were recruited from within hospitals. Available perinatal care was assessed in each hospital, followed by a bottle-neck analysis workshop. A 3-day training in essential newborn care was carried out for health workers involved in perinatal care, and a set of QI tools were introduced to be used in everyday practice (skill-checks, self-assessment checklists, scoreboards and weekly Plan–Do–Study–Act meetings). Refresher training after 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURE: Women’s satisfaction with care during childbirth (a prespecified secondary outcome). RESULTS: The likelihood of women being overall satisfied with care during childbirth increased after the intervention (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.66, 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.73). However, the proportions of overall satisfaction were low (control 58%, intervention 62%). Women were more likely to be satisfied with education and information from health workers after intervention (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.40) and to have been treated with dignity and respect (aOR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.16). The likelihood of having experienced abuse during the hospital stay decreased (aOR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.51) and of being satisfied with the level of privacy increased (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in patient satisfaction were indicated after the introduction of a QI-package on perinatal care. We recommend further studies on which aspects of care are most important to improve women’s satisfaction of perinatal care in hospitals in Nepal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN30829654. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9171223/ /pubmed/35667734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054544 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Global Health Brunell, Olivia Chaulagain, Dipak KC, Ashish Bergström, Anna Målqvist, Mats Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title | Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial |
topic | Global Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35667734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunellolivia effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT chaulagaindipak effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kcashish effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bergstromanna effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT malqvistmats effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial |