Cargando…

Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a quality improvement (QI) package on patient satisfaction of perinatal care. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Participating hospitals were randomised by size into four different wedges. SETTING: 12 secondary-l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brunell, Olivia, Chaulagain, Dipak, KC, Ashish, Bergström, Anna, Målqvist, Mats
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35667734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054544
_version_ 1784721618474369024
author Brunell, Olivia
Chaulagain, Dipak
KC, Ashish
Bergström, Anna
Målqvist, Mats
author_facet Brunell, Olivia
Chaulagain, Dipak
KC, Ashish
Bergström, Anna
Målqvist, Mats
author_sort Brunell, Olivia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a quality improvement (QI) package on patient satisfaction of perinatal care. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Participating hospitals were randomised by size into four different wedges. SETTING: 12 secondary-level public hospitals in Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth in the hospitals at a gestational age of ≥22 weeks, with fetal heart sound at admission. Adverse outcomes were excluded. One hospital was excluded due to data incompleteness and four low-volume hospitals due to large heterogeneity. The final analysis included 54 919 women. INTERVENTION: Hospital management was engaged and facilitators were recruited from within hospitals. Available perinatal care was assessed in each hospital, followed by a bottle-neck analysis workshop. A 3-day training in essential newborn care was carried out for health workers involved in perinatal care, and a set of QI tools were introduced to be used in everyday practice (skill-checks, self-assessment checklists, scoreboards and weekly Plan–Do–Study–Act meetings). Refresher training after 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURE: Women’s satisfaction with care during childbirth (a prespecified secondary outcome). RESULTS: The likelihood of women being overall satisfied with care during childbirth increased after the intervention (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.66, 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.73). However, the proportions of overall satisfaction were low (control 58%, intervention 62%). Women were more likely to be satisfied with education and information from health workers after intervention (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.40) and to have been treated with dignity and respect (aOR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.16). The likelihood of having experienced abuse during the hospital stay decreased (aOR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.51) and of being satisfied with the level of privacy increased (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in patient satisfaction were indicated after the introduction of a QI-package on perinatal care. We recommend further studies on which aspects of care are most important to improve women’s satisfaction of perinatal care in hospitals in Nepal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN30829654.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9171223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91712232022-06-16 Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial Brunell, Olivia Chaulagain, Dipak KC, Ashish Bergström, Anna Målqvist, Mats BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a quality improvement (QI) package on patient satisfaction of perinatal care. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. Participating hospitals were randomised by size into four different wedges. SETTING: 12 secondary-level public hospitals in Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Women who gave birth in the hospitals at a gestational age of ≥22 weeks, with fetal heart sound at admission. Adverse outcomes were excluded. One hospital was excluded due to data incompleteness and four low-volume hospitals due to large heterogeneity. The final analysis included 54 919 women. INTERVENTION: Hospital management was engaged and facilitators were recruited from within hospitals. Available perinatal care was assessed in each hospital, followed by a bottle-neck analysis workshop. A 3-day training in essential newborn care was carried out for health workers involved in perinatal care, and a set of QI tools were introduced to be used in everyday practice (skill-checks, self-assessment checklists, scoreboards and weekly Plan–Do–Study–Act meetings). Refresher training after 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURE: Women’s satisfaction with care during childbirth (a prespecified secondary outcome). RESULTS: The likelihood of women being overall satisfied with care during childbirth increased after the intervention (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.66, 95% CI: 1.59 to 1.73). However, the proportions of overall satisfaction were low (control 58%, intervention 62%). Women were more likely to be satisfied with education and information from health workers after intervention (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.29 to 1.40) and to have been treated with dignity and respect (aOR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.16). The likelihood of having experienced abuse during the hospital stay decreased (aOR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.51) and of being satisfied with the level of privacy increased (aOR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in patient satisfaction were indicated after the introduction of a QI-package on perinatal care. We recommend further studies on which aspects of care are most important to improve women’s satisfaction of perinatal care in hospitals in Nepal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN30829654. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9171223/ /pubmed/35667734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054544 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Global Health
Brunell, Olivia
Chaulagain, Dipak
KC, Ashish
Bergström, Anna
Målqvist, Mats
Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_full Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_short Effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_sort effect of a perinatal care quality improvement package on patient satisfaction: a secondary outcome analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35667734
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054544
work_keys_str_mv AT brunellolivia effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT chaulagaindipak effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kcashish effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bergstromanna effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT malqvistmats effectofaperinatalcarequalityimprovementpackageonpatientsatisfactionasecondaryoutcomeanalysisofaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial