Cargando…

Therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider

The objectives of this review were to collect and summarise evidence on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and to inform the EULAR Task Force for the formulation of evidence-based points to consider. A systematic literature...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krieckaert, Charlotte, Hernández-Breijo, Borja, Gehin, Johanna Elin, le Mélédo, Guillaume, Balsa, Alejandro, Jani, Meghna, Mulleman, Denis, Navarro-Compan, Victoria, Wolbink, Gertjan, Isaacs, John D, van Tubergen, Astrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002216
_version_ 1784721630941937664
author Krieckaert, Charlotte
Hernández-Breijo, Borja
Gehin, Johanna Elin
le Mélédo, Guillaume
Balsa, Alejandro
Jani, Meghna
Mulleman, Denis
Navarro-Compan, Victoria
Wolbink, Gertjan
Isaacs, John D
van Tubergen, Astrid
author_facet Krieckaert, Charlotte
Hernández-Breijo, Borja
Gehin, Johanna Elin
le Mélédo, Guillaume
Balsa, Alejandro
Jani, Meghna
Mulleman, Denis
Navarro-Compan, Victoria
Wolbink, Gertjan
Isaacs, John D
van Tubergen, Astrid
author_sort Krieckaert, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description The objectives of this review were to collect and summarise evidence on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and to inform the EULAR Task Force for the formulation of evidence-based points to consider. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed, covering technical aspects and (clinical) utility of TDM, to answer 13 research questions. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were searched until July 2020. American College of Rheumatology and EULAR abstracts were also considered for inclusion. Data were extracted in evidence tables and risk of bias assessment was performed. For the search on technical aspects, 678 records were identified, of which 22 papers were selected. For the clinical utility search, 3846 records were identified, of which 108 papers were included. Patient-related factors associated with biopharmaceutical blood concentrations included body weight, methotrexate comedication and disease activity. The identification of a target range was hampered by study variability, mainly disease activity measures and study type. Evidence was inconsistent for multiple clinical situations in which TDM is currently applied. However, for some particular scenarios, including prediction of future treatment response, non-response to treatment, tapering and hypersensitivity reactions, robust evidence was found. There is currently no evidence for routine use of proactive TDM, in part because published cost-effectiveness analyses do not incorporate the current landscape of biopharmaceutical costs and usage. This SLR yields evidence in favour of TDM of biopharmaceuticals in some clinical scenarios, but evidence is insufficient to support implementation of routine use of TDM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9171282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91712822022-06-16 Therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider Krieckaert, Charlotte Hernández-Breijo, Borja Gehin, Johanna Elin le Mélédo, Guillaume Balsa, Alejandro Jani, Meghna Mulleman, Denis Navarro-Compan, Victoria Wolbink, Gertjan Isaacs, John D van Tubergen, Astrid RMD Open Treatments The objectives of this review were to collect and summarise evidence on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and to inform the EULAR Task Force for the formulation of evidence-based points to consider. A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed, covering technical aspects and (clinical) utility of TDM, to answer 13 research questions. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were searched until July 2020. American College of Rheumatology and EULAR abstracts were also considered for inclusion. Data were extracted in evidence tables and risk of bias assessment was performed. For the search on technical aspects, 678 records were identified, of which 22 papers were selected. For the clinical utility search, 3846 records were identified, of which 108 papers were included. Patient-related factors associated with biopharmaceutical blood concentrations included body weight, methotrexate comedication and disease activity. The identification of a target range was hampered by study variability, mainly disease activity measures and study type. Evidence was inconsistent for multiple clinical situations in which TDM is currently applied. However, for some particular scenarios, including prediction of future treatment response, non-response to treatment, tapering and hypersensitivity reactions, robust evidence was found. There is currently no evidence for routine use of proactive TDM, in part because published cost-effectiveness analyses do not incorporate the current landscape of biopharmaceutical costs and usage. This SLR yields evidence in favour of TDM of biopharmaceuticals in some clinical scenarios, but evidence is insufficient to support implementation of routine use of TDM. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9171282/ /pubmed/35980738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002216 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Treatments
Krieckaert, Charlotte
Hernández-Breijo, Borja
Gehin, Johanna Elin
le Mélédo, Guillaume
Balsa, Alejandro
Jani, Meghna
Mulleman, Denis
Navarro-Compan, Victoria
Wolbink, Gertjan
Isaacs, John D
van Tubergen, Astrid
Therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title Therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_full Therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_fullStr Therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_short Therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing EULAR points to consider
title_sort therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals in inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease: a systematic literature review informing eular points to consider
topic Treatments
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35980738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002216
work_keys_str_mv AT krieckaertcharlotte therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT hernandezbreijoborja therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT gehinjohannaelin therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT lemeledoguillaume therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT balsaalejandro therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT janimeghna therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT mullemandenis therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT navarrocompanvictoria therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT wolbinkgertjan therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT isaacsjohnd therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider
AT vantubergenastrid therapeuticdrugmonitoringofbiopharmaceuticalsininflammatoryrheumaticandmusculoskeletaldiseaseasystematicliteraturereviewinformingeularpointstoconsider