Cargando…

Title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study

Background: The importance of esthetics has escalated over the years. The purpose of any perioplastic surgery is to address gingival recession while ensuring predictable root coverage and a pleasing appearance. An array of surgical procedures have been recommended for the management of recession def...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pradhan, Sweta, Shetty, Neetha, Kamath, Deepa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35685192
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110829.1
_version_ 1784721632805257216
author Pradhan, Sweta
Shetty, Neetha
Kamath, Deepa
author_facet Pradhan, Sweta
Shetty, Neetha
Kamath, Deepa
author_sort Pradhan, Sweta
collection PubMed
description Background: The importance of esthetics has escalated over the years. The purpose of any perioplastic surgery is to address gingival recession while ensuring predictable root coverage and a pleasing appearance. An array of surgical procedures have been recommended for the management of recession defects. The present study compares the clinical and patient related outcome measures of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane and connective tissue graft in the management of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. Methods: The study was a prospective randomized controlled trial which included eight systemically healthy patients with an age range of 30-44 years with 36 labial/buccal, multiple adjacent, Cairo’s RT1 gingival recession defects, bilaterally.  CAF+CM was performed on one side whereas CAF+CTG was performed on the other side. The two groups were compared clinically at three and six months postoperatively. Results: There was statistically significant decrease in recession depth, recession width, probing depth and clinical attachment level in both the groups from baseline to three and six months. However, intergroup comparisons revealed no statistically significant difference. At six months, both groups showed statistically significant improvements in keratinized tissue width and gingival thickness. The gingival thickness of the CAF+CM group increased significantly at three and six months. In terms of root coverage aesthetic score (RES), there was no significant difference observed between the two groups. In terms of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), patients preferred the CAF+CM technique. Conclusion: Within the limits of the current study, the use of chorion membrane resulted in considerable root coverage and increased gingival thickness. Periodontal regeneration can be facilitated by the distinctive features of the chorion membrane. Coronally advanced flap plus chorion membrane is a novel approach for root coverage procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9171291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91712912022-06-08 Title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study Pradhan, Sweta Shetty, Neetha Kamath, Deepa F1000Res Research Article Background: The importance of esthetics has escalated over the years. The purpose of any perioplastic surgery is to address gingival recession while ensuring predictable root coverage and a pleasing appearance. An array of surgical procedures have been recommended for the management of recession defects. The present study compares the clinical and patient related outcome measures of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane and connective tissue graft in the management of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. Methods: The study was a prospective randomized controlled trial which included eight systemically healthy patients with an age range of 30-44 years with 36 labial/buccal, multiple adjacent, Cairo’s RT1 gingival recession defects, bilaterally.  CAF+CM was performed on one side whereas CAF+CTG was performed on the other side. The two groups were compared clinically at three and six months postoperatively. Results: There was statistically significant decrease in recession depth, recession width, probing depth and clinical attachment level in both the groups from baseline to three and six months. However, intergroup comparisons revealed no statistically significant difference. At six months, both groups showed statistically significant improvements in keratinized tissue width and gingival thickness. The gingival thickness of the CAF+CM group increased significantly at three and six months. In terms of root coverage aesthetic score (RES), there was no significant difference observed between the two groups. In terms of patient reported outcome measures (PROMS), patients preferred the CAF+CM technique. Conclusion: Within the limits of the current study, the use of chorion membrane resulted in considerable root coverage and increased gingival thickness. Periodontal regeneration can be facilitated by the distinctive features of the chorion membrane. Coronally advanced flap plus chorion membrane is a novel approach for root coverage procedures. F1000 Research Limited 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9171291/ /pubmed/35685192 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110829.1 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Pradhan S et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pradhan, Sweta
Shetty, Neetha
Kamath, Deepa
Title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study
title Title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study
title_full Title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study
title_short Title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study
title_sort title-comparison of coronally advanced flap with chorion membrane vs coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth randomised controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35685192
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.110829.1
work_keys_str_mv AT pradhansweta titlecomparisonofcoronallyadvancedflapwithchorionmembranevscoronallyadvancedflapwithconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsasplitmouthrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT shettyneetha titlecomparisonofcoronallyadvancedflapwithchorionmembranevscoronallyadvancedflapwithconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsasplitmouthrandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT kamathdeepa titlecomparisonofcoronallyadvancedflapwithchorionmembranevscoronallyadvancedflapwithconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentofmultiplegingivalrecessionsasplitmouthrandomisedcontrolledstudy