Cargando…

Unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia: distinction from semantic and logopenic variants

Primary progressive aphasia, a neurodegenerative syndrome, presents mainly with language impairment. Both semantic and logopenic variants are fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia. Before the research criteria of primary progressive aphasia were proposed, progressive fluent aphasias, such a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Watanabe, Hiroyuki, Hikida, Sakura, Ikeda, Manabu, Mori, Etsuro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac015
_version_ 1784721680815357952
author Watanabe, Hiroyuki
Hikida, Sakura
Ikeda, Manabu
Mori, Etsuro
author_facet Watanabe, Hiroyuki
Hikida, Sakura
Ikeda, Manabu
Mori, Etsuro
author_sort Watanabe, Hiroyuki
collection PubMed
description Primary progressive aphasia, a neurodegenerative syndrome, presents mainly with language impairment. Both semantic and logopenic variants are fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia. Before the research criteria of primary progressive aphasia were proposed, progressive fluent aphasias, such as progressive anomic aphasia, transcortical sensory aphasia and Wernicke’s aphasia, were reported as classical progressive fluent aphasias seen in Alzheimer’s disease. However, since the research criteria of primary progressive aphasia were established, classical fluent variants (other than semantic and logopenic variants) have been neglected and have not been included in the current classification of primary progressive aphasia. This study aimed to determine whether unclassified fluent variants (other than semantic and logopenic variants) can be manifestations of primary progressive aphasia. This study also reconfirmed the characteristics of classical progressive fluent aphasia, such as progressive anomic aphasia, progressive transcortical sensory aphasia and progressive Wernicke’s aphasia as unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia, using comparison with the current model of primary progressive aphasia. Twelve consecutive patients with an unclassified fluent variant other than semantic or logopenic variant underwent language, neurological, neuropsychological and neuroimaging (MRI and single-photon emission computed tomography) testing. Based on comprehensive language tests, we redefined the diagnoses as primary progressive anomic aphasia (n = 8), primary progressive transcortical sensory aphasia (n = 3) and primary progressive Wernicke’s aphasia (n = 1). Anomic aphasia was characterized by anomia but preserved repetition and comprehension; transcortical sensory aphasia by relatively preserved repetition but poor word comprehension; and Wernicke’s aphasia by poor repetition and word comprehension. In patients with anomic aphasia, voxel-based morphometry of MRI data revealed cortical atrophy, which was most prominent in the temporoparietal lobes, with no obvious lateralization; in two-thirds of patients with transcortical sensory aphasia and in one patient with Wernicke’s aphasia, it revealed atrophy, predominantly in the left temporoparietal lobe. Statistical analysis of single-photon emission computed tomography using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections revealed patterns of left-sided hypoperfusion in the majority of patients. The temporal and parietal lobes were involved in all cases; the degree of hypoperfusion was higher in patients with transcortical sensory aphasia or Wernicke’s aphasia than in patients with anomic aphasia. The present study demonstrated the clinical and imaging features of 12 patients with an unclassified fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia, which we redefined as primary progressive anomic aphasia, primary progressive transcortical sensory aphasia and primary progressive Wernicke’s aphasia. Classical fluent variants other than semantic and logopenic variants can be found in primary progressive aphasia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9171501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91715012022-06-08 Unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia: distinction from semantic and logopenic variants Watanabe, Hiroyuki Hikida, Sakura Ikeda, Manabu Mori, Etsuro Brain Commun Original Article Primary progressive aphasia, a neurodegenerative syndrome, presents mainly with language impairment. Both semantic and logopenic variants are fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia. Before the research criteria of primary progressive aphasia were proposed, progressive fluent aphasias, such as progressive anomic aphasia, transcortical sensory aphasia and Wernicke’s aphasia, were reported as classical progressive fluent aphasias seen in Alzheimer’s disease. However, since the research criteria of primary progressive aphasia were established, classical fluent variants (other than semantic and logopenic variants) have been neglected and have not been included in the current classification of primary progressive aphasia. This study aimed to determine whether unclassified fluent variants (other than semantic and logopenic variants) can be manifestations of primary progressive aphasia. This study also reconfirmed the characteristics of classical progressive fluent aphasia, such as progressive anomic aphasia, progressive transcortical sensory aphasia and progressive Wernicke’s aphasia as unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia, using comparison with the current model of primary progressive aphasia. Twelve consecutive patients with an unclassified fluent variant other than semantic or logopenic variant underwent language, neurological, neuropsychological and neuroimaging (MRI and single-photon emission computed tomography) testing. Based on comprehensive language tests, we redefined the diagnoses as primary progressive anomic aphasia (n = 8), primary progressive transcortical sensory aphasia (n = 3) and primary progressive Wernicke’s aphasia (n = 1). Anomic aphasia was characterized by anomia but preserved repetition and comprehension; transcortical sensory aphasia by relatively preserved repetition but poor word comprehension; and Wernicke’s aphasia by poor repetition and word comprehension. In patients with anomic aphasia, voxel-based morphometry of MRI data revealed cortical atrophy, which was most prominent in the temporoparietal lobes, with no obvious lateralization; in two-thirds of patients with transcortical sensory aphasia and in one patient with Wernicke’s aphasia, it revealed atrophy, predominantly in the left temporoparietal lobe. Statistical analysis of single-photon emission computed tomography using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections revealed patterns of left-sided hypoperfusion in the majority of patients. The temporal and parietal lobes were involved in all cases; the degree of hypoperfusion was higher in patients with transcortical sensory aphasia or Wernicke’s aphasia than in patients with anomic aphasia. The present study demonstrated the clinical and imaging features of 12 patients with an unclassified fluent variant of primary progressive aphasia, which we redefined as primary progressive anomic aphasia, primary progressive transcortical sensory aphasia and primary progressive Wernicke’s aphasia. Classical fluent variants other than semantic and logopenic variants can be found in primary progressive aphasia. Oxford University Press 2022-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9171501/ /pubmed/35686225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac015 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Watanabe, Hiroyuki
Hikida, Sakura
Ikeda, Manabu
Mori, Etsuro
Unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia: distinction from semantic and logopenic variants
title Unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia: distinction from semantic and logopenic variants
title_full Unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia: distinction from semantic and logopenic variants
title_fullStr Unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia: distinction from semantic and logopenic variants
title_full_unstemmed Unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia: distinction from semantic and logopenic variants
title_short Unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia: distinction from semantic and logopenic variants
title_sort unclassified fluent variants of primary progressive aphasia: distinction from semantic and logopenic variants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686225
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac015
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabehiroyuki unclassifiedfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiadistinctionfromsemanticandlogopenicvariants
AT hikidasakura unclassifiedfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiadistinctionfromsemanticandlogopenicvariants
AT ikedamanabu unclassifiedfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiadistinctionfromsemanticandlogopenicvariants
AT morietsuro unclassifiedfluentvariantsofprimaryprogressiveaphasiadistinctionfromsemanticandlogopenicvariants