Cargando…
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol
BACKGROUND: Structured, systematic methods to formulate consensus recommendations, such as the Delphi process or nominal group technique, among others, provide the opportunity to harness the knowledge of experts to support clinical decision making in areas of uncertainty. They are widely used in bio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0 |
_version_ | 1784721731807608832 |
---|---|
author | Gattrell, William T. Hungin, Amrit Pali Price, Amy Winchester, Christopher C. Tovey, David Hughes, Ellen L. van Zuuren, Esther J. Goldman, Keith Logullo, Patricia Matheis, Robert Harrison, Niall |
author_facet | Gattrell, William T. Hungin, Amrit Pali Price, Amy Winchester, Christopher C. Tovey, David Hughes, Ellen L. van Zuuren, Esther J. Goldman, Keith Logullo, Patricia Matheis, Robert Harrison, Niall |
author_sort | Gattrell, William T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Structured, systematic methods to formulate consensus recommendations, such as the Delphi process or nominal group technique, among others, provide the opportunity to harness the knowledge of experts to support clinical decision making in areas of uncertainty. They are widely used in biomedical research, in particular where disease characteristics or resource limitations mean that high-quality evidence generation is difficult. However, poor reporting of methods used to reach a consensus – for example, not clearly explaining the definition of consensus, or not stating how consensus group panellists were selected – can potentially undermine confidence in this type of research and hinder reproducibility. Our objective is therefore to systematically develop a reporting guideline to help the biomedical research and clinical practice community describe the methods or techniques used to reach consensus in a complete, transparent, and consistent manner. METHODS: The ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) project will take place in five stages and follow the EQUATOR Network guidance for the development of reporting guidelines. In Stage 1, a multidisciplinary Steering Committee has been established to lead and coordinate the guideline development process. In Stage 2, a systematic literature review will identify evidence on the quality of the reporting of consensus methodology, to obtain potential items for a reporting checklist. In Stage 3, Delphi methodology will be used to reach consensus regarding the checklist items, first among the Steering Committee, and then among a broader Delphi panel comprising participants with a range of expertise, including patient representatives. In Stage 4, the reporting guideline will be finalised in a consensus meeting, along with the production of an Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. In Stage 5, we plan to publish the reporting guideline and E&E document in open-access journals, supported by presentations at appropriate events. Dissemination of the reporting guideline, including a website linked to social media channels, is crucial for the document to be implemented in practice. DISCUSSION: The ACCORD reporting guideline will provide a set of minimum items that should be reported about methods used to achieve consensus, including approaches ranging from simple unstructured opinion gatherings to highly structured processes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9171734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91717342022-06-08 ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol Gattrell, William T. Hungin, Amrit Pali Price, Amy Winchester, Christopher C. Tovey, David Hughes, Ellen L. van Zuuren, Esther J. Goldman, Keith Logullo, Patricia Matheis, Robert Harrison, Niall Res Integr Peer Rev Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Structured, systematic methods to formulate consensus recommendations, such as the Delphi process or nominal group technique, among others, provide the opportunity to harness the knowledge of experts to support clinical decision making in areas of uncertainty. They are widely used in biomedical research, in particular where disease characteristics or resource limitations mean that high-quality evidence generation is difficult. However, poor reporting of methods used to reach a consensus – for example, not clearly explaining the definition of consensus, or not stating how consensus group panellists were selected – can potentially undermine confidence in this type of research and hinder reproducibility. Our objective is therefore to systematically develop a reporting guideline to help the biomedical research and clinical practice community describe the methods or techniques used to reach consensus in a complete, transparent, and consistent manner. METHODS: The ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document) project will take place in five stages and follow the EQUATOR Network guidance for the development of reporting guidelines. In Stage 1, a multidisciplinary Steering Committee has been established to lead and coordinate the guideline development process. In Stage 2, a systematic literature review will identify evidence on the quality of the reporting of consensus methodology, to obtain potential items for a reporting checklist. In Stage 3, Delphi methodology will be used to reach consensus regarding the checklist items, first among the Steering Committee, and then among a broader Delphi panel comprising participants with a range of expertise, including patient representatives. In Stage 4, the reporting guideline will be finalised in a consensus meeting, along with the production of an Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. In Stage 5, we plan to publish the reporting guideline and E&E document in open-access journals, supported by presentations at appropriate events. Dissemination of the reporting guideline, including a website linked to social media channels, is crucial for the document to be implemented in practice. DISCUSSION: The ACCORD reporting guideline will provide a set of minimum items that should be reported about methods used to achieve consensus, including approaches ranging from simple unstructured opinion gatherings to highly structured processes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0. BioMed Central 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9171734/ /pubmed/35672782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Gattrell, William T. Hungin, Amrit Pali Price, Amy Winchester, Christopher C. Tovey, David Hughes, Ellen L. van Zuuren, Esther J. Goldman, Keith Logullo, Patricia Matheis, Robert Harrison, Niall ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol |
title | ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol |
title_full | ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol |
title_fullStr | ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol |
title_short | ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol |
title_sort | accord guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9171734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35672782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gattrellwilliamt accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT hunginamritpali accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT priceamy accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT winchesterchristopherc accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT toveydavid accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT hughesellenl accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT vanzuurenestherj accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT goldmankeith accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT logullopatricia accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT matheisrobert accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol AT harrisonniall accordguidelineforreportingconsensusbasedmethodsinbiomedicalresearchandclinicalpracticeastudyprotocol |