Cargando…

Developing a bioinformatics pipeline for comparative protein classification analysis

BACKGROUND: Protein classification is a task of paramount importance in various fields of biology. Despite the great momentum of modern implementation of protein classification, machine learning techniques such as Random Forest and Neural Network could not always be used for several reasons: data co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Pelosi, Benedetta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-022-01045-x
_version_ 1784721817958612992
author Pelosi, Benedetta
author_facet Pelosi, Benedetta
author_sort Pelosi, Benedetta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Protein classification is a task of paramount importance in various fields of biology. Despite the great momentum of modern implementation of protein classification, machine learning techniques such as Random Forest and Neural Network could not always be used for several reasons: data collection, unbalanced classification or labelling of the data.As an alternative, I propose the use of a bioinformatics pipeline to search for and classify information from protein databases. Hence, to evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of the pipeline, I focused on the carotenoid biosynthetic genes and developed a filtering approach to retrieve orthologs clusters in two well-studied plants that belong to the Brassicaceae family: Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica rapa Pekinensis group. The result obtained has been compared with previous studies on carotenoid biosynthetic genes in B. rapa where phylogenetic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The developed bioinformatics pipeline relies on commercial software and multiple databeses including the use of phylogeny, Gene Ontology terms (GOs) and Protein Families (Pfams) at a protein level. Furthermore, the phylogeny is coupled with “population analysis” to evaluate the potential orthologs. All the steps taken together give a final table of potential orthologs. The phylogenetic tree gives a result of 43 putative orthologs conserved in B. rapa Pekinensis group. Different A. thaliana proteins have more than one syntenic ortholog as also shown in a previous finding (Li et al., BMC Genomics 16(1):1–11, 2015). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, when the biological features of proteins of interest are not specific, I can rely on a computational approach in filtering steps for classification purposes. The comparison of the results obtained here for the carotenoid biosynthetic genes with previous research confirmed the accuracy of the developed pipeline which can therefore be applied for filtering different types of datasets. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12863-022-01045-x).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9172112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91721122022-06-08 Developing a bioinformatics pipeline for comparative protein classification analysis Pelosi, Benedetta BMC Genom Data Research BACKGROUND: Protein classification is a task of paramount importance in various fields of biology. Despite the great momentum of modern implementation of protein classification, machine learning techniques such as Random Forest and Neural Network could not always be used for several reasons: data collection, unbalanced classification or labelling of the data.As an alternative, I propose the use of a bioinformatics pipeline to search for and classify information from protein databases. Hence, to evaluate the efficiency and accuracy of the pipeline, I focused on the carotenoid biosynthetic genes and developed a filtering approach to retrieve orthologs clusters in two well-studied plants that belong to the Brassicaceae family: Arabidopsis thaliana and Brassica rapa Pekinensis group. The result obtained has been compared with previous studies on carotenoid biosynthetic genes in B. rapa where phylogenetic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The developed bioinformatics pipeline relies on commercial software and multiple databeses including the use of phylogeny, Gene Ontology terms (GOs) and Protein Families (Pfams) at a protein level. Furthermore, the phylogeny is coupled with “population analysis” to evaluate the potential orthologs. All the steps taken together give a final table of potential orthologs. The phylogenetic tree gives a result of 43 putative orthologs conserved in B. rapa Pekinensis group. Different A. thaliana proteins have more than one syntenic ortholog as also shown in a previous finding (Li et al., BMC Genomics 16(1):1–11, 2015). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, when the biological features of proteins of interest are not specific, I can rely on a computational approach in filtering steps for classification purposes. The comparison of the results obtained here for the carotenoid biosynthetic genes with previous research confirmed the accuracy of the developed pipeline which can therefore be applied for filtering different types of datasets. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12863-022-01045-x). BioMed Central 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9172112/ /pubmed/35668373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-022-01045-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pelosi, Benedetta
Developing a bioinformatics pipeline for comparative protein classification analysis
title Developing a bioinformatics pipeline for comparative protein classification analysis
title_full Developing a bioinformatics pipeline for comparative protein classification analysis
title_fullStr Developing a bioinformatics pipeline for comparative protein classification analysis
title_full_unstemmed Developing a bioinformatics pipeline for comparative protein classification analysis
title_short Developing a bioinformatics pipeline for comparative protein classification analysis
title_sort developing a bioinformatics pipeline for comparative protein classification analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35668373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12863-022-01045-x
work_keys_str_mv AT pelosibenedetta developingabioinformaticspipelineforcomparativeproteinclassificationanalysis