Cargando…

Precision of image-guided spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and impact of positioning variables

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) requires high precision. We evaluate the intrafraction motion during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided SABR with different immobilization techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients were tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Billiet, Charlotte, Vingerhoed, Wim, Van Laere, Steven, Joye, Ines, Mercier, Carole, Dirix, Piet, Nevens, Daan, Vermeulen, Peter, Meijnders, Paul, Verellen, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.006
_version_ 1784721830415695872
author Billiet, Charlotte
Vingerhoed, Wim
Van Laere, Steven
Joye, Ines
Mercier, Carole
Dirix, Piet
Nevens, Daan
Vermeulen, Peter
Meijnders, Paul
Verellen, Dirk
author_facet Billiet, Charlotte
Vingerhoed, Wim
Van Laere, Steven
Joye, Ines
Mercier, Carole
Dirix, Piet
Nevens, Daan
Vermeulen, Peter
Meijnders, Paul
Verellen, Dirk
author_sort Billiet, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) requires high precision. We evaluate the intrafraction motion during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided SABR with different immobilization techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients were treated for 62 spinal lesions with SABR with positioning corrected in six degrees of freedom. A surface monitoring system was used for patient set up and to ensure patient immobilization in 65% of patients. Intrafractional motion was defined as the difference between the last CBCT before the start of treatment and the first CT afterwards. RESULTS: For all 194 fractions, the mean intrafractional motion was 0.1 cm (0–1.1 cm) in vertical direction, 0.1 cm (0–1.1 cm) in longitudinal direction and 0.1 cm (0–0.5 cm) in lateral direction. A mean pitch of 0.6° (0–4.3°), a roll of 0.5° (0–3.4°) and a rotational motion of 0.4° (0–3.9°) was observed. 95.5% of the translational errors and 95.4% of the rotational errors were within safety range. There was a significantly higher rotational motion for patients with arms along the body (p = 0.01) and without the use of the body mask (p = 0.05). For cervical locations a higher rotational motion was seen, although not significant (p = 0.1). The acquisition of an extra CBCT was correlated with a higher rotational (pitch) motion (p = 0 < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Very high precision in CBCT guided and surface-guided spinal SABR was observed in this cohort. The lowest intrafraction motion was seen in patients treated with arms above their head and a body mask. The use of IGRT with surface monitoring is an added value for patient monitoring leading to treatment interruption if necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9172170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91721702022-06-08 Precision of image-guided spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and impact of positioning variables Billiet, Charlotte Vingerhoed, Wim Van Laere, Steven Joye, Ines Mercier, Carole Dirix, Piet Nevens, Daan Vermeulen, Peter Meijnders, Paul Verellen, Dirk Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Spinal stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) requires high precision. We evaluate the intrafraction motion during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided SABR with different immobilization techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-seven consecutive patients were treated for 62 spinal lesions with SABR with positioning corrected in six degrees of freedom. A surface monitoring system was used for patient set up and to ensure patient immobilization in 65% of patients. Intrafractional motion was defined as the difference between the last CBCT before the start of treatment and the first CT afterwards. RESULTS: For all 194 fractions, the mean intrafractional motion was 0.1 cm (0–1.1 cm) in vertical direction, 0.1 cm (0–1.1 cm) in longitudinal direction and 0.1 cm (0–0.5 cm) in lateral direction. A mean pitch of 0.6° (0–4.3°), a roll of 0.5° (0–3.4°) and a rotational motion of 0.4° (0–3.9°) was observed. 95.5% of the translational errors and 95.4% of the rotational errors were within safety range. There was a significantly higher rotational motion for patients with arms along the body (p = 0.01) and without the use of the body mask (p = 0.05). For cervical locations a higher rotational motion was seen, although not significant (p = 0.1). The acquisition of an extra CBCT was correlated with a higher rotational (pitch) motion (p = 0 < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Very high precision in CBCT guided and surface-guided spinal SABR was observed in this cohort. The lowest intrafraction motion was seen in patients treated with arms above their head and a body mask. The use of IGRT with surface monitoring is an added value for patient monitoring leading to treatment interruption if necessary. Elsevier 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9172170/ /pubmed/35686020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.006 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society of Radiotherapy & Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Billiet, Charlotte
Vingerhoed, Wim
Van Laere, Steven
Joye, Ines
Mercier, Carole
Dirix, Piet
Nevens, Daan
Vermeulen, Peter
Meijnders, Paul
Verellen, Dirk
Precision of image-guided spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and impact of positioning variables
title Precision of image-guided spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and impact of positioning variables
title_full Precision of image-guided spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and impact of positioning variables
title_fullStr Precision of image-guided spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and impact of positioning variables
title_full_unstemmed Precision of image-guided spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and impact of positioning variables
title_short Precision of image-guided spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and impact of positioning variables
title_sort precision of image-guided spinal stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and impact of positioning variables
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.04.006
work_keys_str_mv AT billietcharlotte precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables
AT vingerhoedwim precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables
AT vanlaeresteven precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables
AT joyeines precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables
AT merciercarole precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables
AT dirixpiet precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables
AT nevensdaan precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables
AT vermeulenpeter precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables
AT meijnderspaul precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables
AT verellendirk precisionofimageguidedspinalstereotacticablativeradiotherapyandimpactofpositioningvariables