Cargando…
The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose?
Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a widely used and ideal transduction modality for fluorescent based biosensors as it offers high signal to noise with a visibly detectable signal. While intense efforts are ongoing to improve the limit of detection and dynamic range of biosensors based on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc06921g |
_version_ | 1784721876060209152 |
---|---|
author | Grazon, Chloé Chern, Margaret Lally, Patrick Baer, R. C. Fan, Andy Lecommandoux, Sébastien Klapperich, Catherine Dennis, Allison M. Galagan, James E. Grinstaff, Mark W. |
author_facet | Grazon, Chloé Chern, Margaret Lally, Patrick Baer, R. C. Fan, Andy Lecommandoux, Sébastien Klapperich, Catherine Dennis, Allison M. Galagan, James E. Grinstaff, Mark W. |
author_sort | Grazon, Chloé |
collection | PubMed |
description | Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a widely used and ideal transduction modality for fluorescent based biosensors as it offers high signal to noise with a visibly detectable signal. While intense efforts are ongoing to improve the limit of detection and dynamic range of biosensors based on biomolecule optimization, the selection of and relative location of the dye remains understudied. Herein, we describe a combined experimental and computational study to systematically compare the nature of the dye, i.e., organic fluorophore (Cy5 or Texas Red) vs. inorganic nanoparticle (QD), and the position of the FRET donor or acceptor on the biomolecular components. Using a recently discovered transcription factor (TF)–deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) biosensor for progesterone, we examine four different biosensor configurations and report the quantum yield, lifetime, FRET efficiency, IC50, and limit of detection. Fitting the computational models to the empirical data identifies key molecular parameters driving sensor performance in each biosensor configuration. Finally, we provide a set of design parameters to enable one to select the fluorophore system for future intermolecular biosensors using FRET-based conformational regulation in in vitro assays and new diagnostic devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9172442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91724422022-06-23 The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose? Grazon, Chloé Chern, Margaret Lally, Patrick Baer, R. C. Fan, Andy Lecommandoux, Sébastien Klapperich, Catherine Dennis, Allison M. Galagan, James E. Grinstaff, Mark W. Chem Sci Chemistry Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a widely used and ideal transduction modality for fluorescent based biosensors as it offers high signal to noise with a visibly detectable signal. While intense efforts are ongoing to improve the limit of detection and dynamic range of biosensors based on biomolecule optimization, the selection of and relative location of the dye remains understudied. Herein, we describe a combined experimental and computational study to systematically compare the nature of the dye, i.e., organic fluorophore (Cy5 or Texas Red) vs. inorganic nanoparticle (QD), and the position of the FRET donor or acceptor on the biomolecular components. Using a recently discovered transcription factor (TF)–deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) biosensor for progesterone, we examine four different biosensor configurations and report the quantum yield, lifetime, FRET efficiency, IC50, and limit of detection. Fitting the computational models to the empirical data identifies key molecular parameters driving sensor performance in each biosensor configuration. Finally, we provide a set of design parameters to enable one to select the fluorophore system for future intermolecular biosensors using FRET-based conformational regulation in in vitro assays and new diagnostic devices. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9172442/ /pubmed/35756504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc06921g Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Grazon, Chloé Chern, Margaret Lally, Patrick Baer, R. C. Fan, Andy Lecommandoux, Sébastien Klapperich, Catherine Dennis, Allison M. Galagan, James E. Grinstaff, Mark W. The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose? |
title | The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose? |
title_full | The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose? |
title_fullStr | The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose? |
title_full_unstemmed | The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose? |
title_short | The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose? |
title_sort | quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric fret-based biosensors: which one would you chose? |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc06921g |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grazonchloe thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT chernmargaret thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT lallypatrick thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT baerrc thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT fanandy thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT lecommandouxsebastien thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT klapperichcatherine thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT dennisallisonm thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT galaganjamese thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT grinstaffmarkw thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT grazonchloe quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT chernmargaret quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT lallypatrick quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT baerrc quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT fanandy quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT lecommandouxsebastien quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT klapperichcatherine quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT dennisallisonm quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT galaganjamese quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose AT grinstaffmarkw quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose |