Cargando…

The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose?

Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a widely used and ideal transduction modality for fluorescent based biosensors as it offers high signal to noise with a visibly detectable signal. While intense efforts are ongoing to improve the limit of detection and dynamic range of biosensors based on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grazon, Chloé, Chern, Margaret, Lally, Patrick, Baer, R. C., Fan, Andy, Lecommandoux, Sébastien, Klapperich, Catherine, Dennis, Allison M., Galagan, James E., Grinstaff, Mark W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc06921g
_version_ 1784721876060209152
author Grazon, Chloé
Chern, Margaret
Lally, Patrick
Baer, R. C.
Fan, Andy
Lecommandoux, Sébastien
Klapperich, Catherine
Dennis, Allison M.
Galagan, James E.
Grinstaff, Mark W.
author_facet Grazon, Chloé
Chern, Margaret
Lally, Patrick
Baer, R. C.
Fan, Andy
Lecommandoux, Sébastien
Klapperich, Catherine
Dennis, Allison M.
Galagan, James E.
Grinstaff, Mark W.
author_sort Grazon, Chloé
collection PubMed
description Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a widely used and ideal transduction modality for fluorescent based biosensors as it offers high signal to noise with a visibly detectable signal. While intense efforts are ongoing to improve the limit of detection and dynamic range of biosensors based on biomolecule optimization, the selection of and relative location of the dye remains understudied. Herein, we describe a combined experimental and computational study to systematically compare the nature of the dye, i.e., organic fluorophore (Cy5 or Texas Red) vs. inorganic nanoparticle (QD), and the position of the FRET donor or acceptor on the biomolecular components. Using a recently discovered transcription factor (TF)–deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) biosensor for progesterone, we examine four different biosensor configurations and report the quantum yield, lifetime, FRET efficiency, IC50, and limit of detection. Fitting the computational models to the empirical data identifies key molecular parameters driving sensor performance in each biosensor configuration. Finally, we provide a set of design parameters to enable one to select the fluorophore system for future intermolecular biosensors using FRET-based conformational regulation in in vitro assays and new diagnostic devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9172442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91724422022-06-23 The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose? Grazon, Chloé Chern, Margaret Lally, Patrick Baer, R. C. Fan, Andy Lecommandoux, Sébastien Klapperich, Catherine Dennis, Allison M. Galagan, James E. Grinstaff, Mark W. Chem Sci Chemistry Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a widely used and ideal transduction modality for fluorescent based biosensors as it offers high signal to noise with a visibly detectable signal. While intense efforts are ongoing to improve the limit of detection and dynamic range of biosensors based on biomolecule optimization, the selection of and relative location of the dye remains understudied. Herein, we describe a combined experimental and computational study to systematically compare the nature of the dye, i.e., organic fluorophore (Cy5 or Texas Red) vs. inorganic nanoparticle (QD), and the position of the FRET donor or acceptor on the biomolecular components. Using a recently discovered transcription factor (TF)–deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) biosensor for progesterone, we examine four different biosensor configurations and report the quantum yield, lifetime, FRET efficiency, IC50, and limit of detection. Fitting the computational models to the empirical data identifies key molecular parameters driving sensor performance in each biosensor configuration. Finally, we provide a set of design parameters to enable one to select the fluorophore system for future intermolecular biosensors using FRET-based conformational regulation in in vitro assays and new diagnostic devices. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9172442/ /pubmed/35756504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc06921g Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Grazon, Chloé
Chern, Margaret
Lally, Patrick
Baer, R. C.
Fan, Andy
Lecommandoux, Sébastien
Klapperich, Catherine
Dennis, Allison M.
Galagan, James E.
Grinstaff, Mark W.
The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose?
title The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose?
title_full The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose?
title_fullStr The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose?
title_full_unstemmed The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose?
title_short The quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric FRET-based biosensors: which one would you chose?
title_sort quantum dot vs. organic dye conundrum for ratiometric fret-based biosensors: which one would you chose?
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35756504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1sc06921g
work_keys_str_mv AT grazonchloe thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT chernmargaret thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT lallypatrick thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT baerrc thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT fanandy thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT lecommandouxsebastien thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT klapperichcatherine thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT dennisallisonm thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT galaganjamese thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT grinstaffmarkw thequantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT grazonchloe quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT chernmargaret quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT lallypatrick quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT baerrc quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT fanandy quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT lecommandouxsebastien quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT klapperichcatherine quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT dennisallisonm quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT galaganjamese quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose
AT grinstaffmarkw quantumdotvsorganicdyeconundrumforratiometricfretbasedbiosensorswhichonewouldyouchose