Cargando…

Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Individualization using different volumes of polyethylene glycol is widely regarded as the optimal solution for bowel preparation, while the patient-directed regimen we propose may serve as a reliable individual solution. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and satisfaction...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jixiang, Jia, Xuemei, Guo, Yuanmei, Jiang, Haotian, Hu, Jiaming, Wang, Siwei, Huang, Binglu, Su, Wenhao, Liu, Jun, Wang, Xiaoli, Dong, Weiguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35694717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pbac009
_version_ 1784721915792850944
author Zhang, Jixiang
Jia, Xuemei
Guo, Yuanmei
Jiang, Haotian
Hu, Jiaming
Wang, Siwei
Huang, Binglu
Su, Wenhao
Liu, Jun
Wang, Xiaoli
Dong, Weiguo
author_facet Zhang, Jixiang
Jia, Xuemei
Guo, Yuanmei
Jiang, Haotian
Hu, Jiaming
Wang, Siwei
Huang, Binglu
Su, Wenhao
Liu, Jun
Wang, Xiaoli
Dong, Weiguo
author_sort Zhang, Jixiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individualization using different volumes of polyethylene glycol is widely regarded as the optimal solution for bowel preparation, while the patient-directed regimen we propose may serve as a reliable individual solution. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and satisfaction of bowel preparation with a patient-directed regimen. METHODS: Patients in the fixed-volume group ingested the same amount of PEG, while those in patient-directed group ingested different amount according to stool consistency or stool water content. RESULTS: After filtering by exclusion criteria, 428 individuals in the fixed-volume group and 103 in the patient-directed group were successfully enrolled and analyzed. Eighty-three (80.6%) individuals in the patient-directed group had a reduced polyethylene glycol volume. There was no significant difference in the bowel preparation efficacy between the two groups (90.0% vs. 90.3%, χ² = 0.01; p = 0.918). Patients in the patient-directed group complained of fewer adverse effects (53.0% vs. 36.9%, χ² = 8.655; p = 0.003), especially vomiting (13.6% vs. 1.0%, χ² = 13.304; p < 0.001). Regarding comfort during bowel preparation, the degree of comfort was not significantly different between groups. Furthermore, the willingness rate for further colonoscopy in the patient-directed group was significantly higher than that in the fixed-volume group (90.3% vs. 77.1%, χ² = 8.912; p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the body mass index served as an independent factor impacting quality of bowel preparation with the patient-directed regimen (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00–1.34; p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Without decreasing the bowel preparation efficacy, the patient-directed regimen increased the safety and satisfaction of bowel preparation and is expected to be a regular and individual solution for bowel preparation. Individuals with a lower body mass index are more likely to undertake this new regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1900022072 at ChiClinicalTrials.gov
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9172656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91726562022-06-10 Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial Zhang, Jixiang Jia, Xuemei Guo, Yuanmei Jiang, Haotian Hu, Jiaming Wang, Siwei Huang, Binglu Su, Wenhao Liu, Jun Wang, Xiaoli Dong, Weiguo Precis Clin Med Clinical Trial BACKGROUND: Individualization using different volumes of polyethylene glycol is widely regarded as the optimal solution for bowel preparation, while the patient-directed regimen we propose may serve as a reliable individual solution. This study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and satisfaction of bowel preparation with a patient-directed regimen. METHODS: Patients in the fixed-volume group ingested the same amount of PEG, while those in patient-directed group ingested different amount according to stool consistency or stool water content. RESULTS: After filtering by exclusion criteria, 428 individuals in the fixed-volume group and 103 in the patient-directed group were successfully enrolled and analyzed. Eighty-three (80.6%) individuals in the patient-directed group had a reduced polyethylene glycol volume. There was no significant difference in the bowel preparation efficacy between the two groups (90.0% vs. 90.3%, χ² = 0.01; p = 0.918). Patients in the patient-directed group complained of fewer adverse effects (53.0% vs. 36.9%, χ² = 8.655; p = 0.003), especially vomiting (13.6% vs. 1.0%, χ² = 13.304; p < 0.001). Regarding comfort during bowel preparation, the degree of comfort was not significantly different between groups. Furthermore, the willingness rate for further colonoscopy in the patient-directed group was significantly higher than that in the fixed-volume group (90.3% vs. 77.1%, χ² = 8.912; p < 0.05). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the body mass index served as an independent factor impacting quality of bowel preparation with the patient-directed regimen (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.00–1.34; p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: Without decreasing the bowel preparation efficacy, the patient-directed regimen increased the safety and satisfaction of bowel preparation and is expected to be a regular and individual solution for bowel preparation. Individuals with a lower body mass index are more likely to undertake this new regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1900022072 at ChiClinicalTrials.gov Oxford University Press 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9172656/ /pubmed/35694717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pbac009 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the West China School of Medicine & West China Hospital of Sichuan University. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions.com
spellingShingle Clinical Trial
Zhang, Jixiang
Jia, Xuemei
Guo, Yuanmei
Jiang, Haotian
Hu, Jiaming
Wang, Siwei
Huang, Binglu
Su, Wenhao
Liu, Jun
Wang, Xiaoli
Dong, Weiguo
Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial
title Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Patient-directed vs. fixed-volume PEG for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort patient-directed vs. fixed-volume peg for colonoscopy preparation: a randomized controlled trial
topic Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35694717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcmedi/pbac009
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjixiang patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jiaxuemei patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT guoyuanmei patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jianghaotian patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hujiaming patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangsiwei patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huangbinglu patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT suwenhao patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liujun patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangxiaoli patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dongweiguo patientdirectedvsfixedvolumepegforcolonoscopypreparationarandomizedcontrolledtrial