Cargando…

English Phrase Learning With Multimodal Input

Although multimodal input has the potential to lead to more sound learning outcomes, it carries the risk of causing cognitive overload, making it difficult to determine the exact effects of multimodal input on the second language (L2) phrase learning. This study tests the efficacy of multimodal inpu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yuanlin, Zhang, Zina, Yu, Jia, Liu, Xiaobin, Huang, Yuhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686085
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828022
_version_ 1784721936778002432
author Huang, Yuanlin
Zhang, Zina
Yu, Jia
Liu, Xiaobin
Huang, Yuhong
author_facet Huang, Yuanlin
Zhang, Zina
Yu, Jia
Liu, Xiaobin
Huang, Yuhong
author_sort Huang, Yuanlin
collection PubMed
description Although multimodal input has the potential to lead to more sound learning outcomes, it carries the risk of causing cognitive overload, making it difficult to determine the exact effects of multimodal input on the second language (L2) phrase learning. This study tests the efficacy of multimodal input on L2 phrase learning. It adopts a mixed-method approach by utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data. The experimental design is a 2 × 3 mixed model, with a group [the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG)] as the between-subject factor and time (pretest, midtest, and posttest) as the within-subject factor. A total of 66 participants were divided into two groups. All materials incorporated three aspects of phrase knowledge (form, meaning, and use), but the materials of the CG were unimodal in that they were offered only on paper, and of the EG were multimodal in that they included pictures, audio recordings, and video clips. After the treatment, a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview were given to the EG learners to explore their perceptions of using multimodal materials to learn L2 phrases. The results indicate that both groups had significant gains in learning phrases, but students with the multimodal input achieved significantly better results than those with the unimodal input. Moreover, the EG students had a generally positive attitude toward the use of multimodal resources. This study validates the efficacy of multimodal input on the acquisition of English phrases and shows that cognitive overload was avoided by sequencing the information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9172966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91729662022-06-08 English Phrase Learning With Multimodal Input Huang, Yuanlin Zhang, Zina Yu, Jia Liu, Xiaobin Huang, Yuhong Front Psychol Psychology Although multimodal input has the potential to lead to more sound learning outcomes, it carries the risk of causing cognitive overload, making it difficult to determine the exact effects of multimodal input on the second language (L2) phrase learning. This study tests the efficacy of multimodal input on L2 phrase learning. It adopts a mixed-method approach by utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data. The experimental design is a 2 × 3 mixed model, with a group [the experimental group (EG) and the control group (CG)] as the between-subject factor and time (pretest, midtest, and posttest) as the within-subject factor. A total of 66 participants were divided into two groups. All materials incorporated three aspects of phrase knowledge (form, meaning, and use), but the materials of the CG were unimodal in that they were offered only on paper, and of the EG were multimodal in that they included pictures, audio recordings, and video clips. After the treatment, a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview were given to the EG learners to explore their perceptions of using multimodal materials to learn L2 phrases. The results indicate that both groups had significant gains in learning phrases, but students with the multimodal input achieved significantly better results than those with the unimodal input. Moreover, the EG students had a generally positive attitude toward the use of multimodal resources. This study validates the efficacy of multimodal input on the acquisition of English phrases and shows that cognitive overload was avoided by sequencing the information. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9172966/ /pubmed/35686085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828022 Text en Copyright © 2022 Huang, Zhang, Yu, Liu and Huang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Huang, Yuanlin
Zhang, Zina
Yu, Jia
Liu, Xiaobin
Huang, Yuhong
English Phrase Learning With Multimodal Input
title English Phrase Learning With Multimodal Input
title_full English Phrase Learning With Multimodal Input
title_fullStr English Phrase Learning With Multimodal Input
title_full_unstemmed English Phrase Learning With Multimodal Input
title_short English Phrase Learning With Multimodal Input
title_sort english phrase learning with multimodal input
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9172966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35686085
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828022
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyuanlin englishphraselearningwithmultimodalinput
AT zhangzina englishphraselearningwithmultimodalinput
AT yujia englishphraselearningwithmultimodalinput
AT liuxiaobin englishphraselearningwithmultimodalinput
AT huangyuhong englishphraselearningwithmultimodalinput