Cargando…

Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches

Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. OBJECTIVES: We a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bertola, Laiss, Benseñor, Isabela Judith Martins, Brunoni, Andre Russowsky, Caramelli, Paulo, Barreto, Sandhi Maria, Moreno, Arlinda Barbosa, Griep, Rosane Harter, Viana, Maria Carmen, Lotufo, Paulo Andrade, Suemoto, Claudia Kimie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0027
_version_ 1784722098088837120
author Bertola, Laiss
Benseñor, Isabela Judith Martins
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
Caramelli, Paulo
Barreto, Sandhi Maria
Moreno, Arlinda Barbosa
Griep, Rosane Harter
Viana, Maria Carmen
Lotufo, Paulo Andrade
Suemoto, Claudia Kimie
author_facet Bertola, Laiss
Benseñor, Isabela Judith Martins
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
Caramelli, Paulo
Barreto, Sandhi Maria
Moreno, Arlinda Barbosa
Griep, Rosane Harter
Viana, Maria Carmen
Lotufo, Paulo Andrade
Suemoto, Claudia Kimie
author_sort Bertola, Laiss
collection PubMed
description Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to verify the occurrence of the retest effect and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the follow-up scores in a sample of 5,592 participants with a diverse sociodemographic profile, who were assessed twice during 4 years of follow-up. METHODS: We tested two possible approaches to correct the retest effect and calculated the Reliable Change Index. RESULTS: We observed increased scores at the follow-up assessment after 4 years, but the results indicate a modest occurrence of retest effects. The regression difference correction successfully generated follow-up corrected scores, while the mean difference did not provide effective corrections. Sociodemographic characteristics had a minor impact on the retest. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the regression difference correction for retest effects. The absence of this methodological approach might lead to biased results using longitudinal cognitive scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9173799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91737992022-06-17 Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches Bertola, Laiss Benseñor, Isabela Judith Martins Brunoni, Andre Russowsky Caramelli, Paulo Barreto, Sandhi Maria Moreno, Arlinda Barbosa Griep, Rosane Harter Viana, Maria Carmen Lotufo, Paulo Andrade Suemoto, Claudia Kimie Dement Neuropsychol Original Article Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to verify the occurrence of the retest effect and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the follow-up scores in a sample of 5,592 participants with a diverse sociodemographic profile, who were assessed twice during 4 years of follow-up. METHODS: We tested two possible approaches to correct the retest effect and calculated the Reliable Change Index. RESULTS: We observed increased scores at the follow-up assessment after 4 years, but the results indicate a modest occurrence of retest effects. The regression difference correction successfully generated follow-up corrected scores, while the mean difference did not provide effective corrections. Sociodemographic characteristics had a minor impact on the retest. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the regression difference correction for retest effects. The absence of this methodological approach might lead to biased results using longitudinal cognitive scores. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento 2022-04-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9173799/ /pubmed/35720646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0027 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Bertola, Laiss
Benseñor, Isabela Judith Martins
Brunoni, Andre Russowsky
Caramelli, Paulo
Barreto, Sandhi Maria
Moreno, Arlinda Barbosa
Griep, Rosane Harter
Viana, Maria Carmen
Lotufo, Paulo Andrade
Suemoto, Claudia Kimie
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches
title Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches
title_full Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches
title_fullStr Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches
title_full_unstemmed Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches
title_short Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches
title_sort retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0027
work_keys_str_mv AT bertolalaiss retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches
AT bensenorisabelajudithmartins retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches
AT brunoniandrerussowsky retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches
AT caramellipaulo retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches
AT barretosandhimaria retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches
AT morenoarlindabarbosa retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches
AT grieprosaneharter retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches
AT vianamariacarmen retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches
AT lotufopauloandrade retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches
AT suemotoclaudiakimie retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches