Cargando…
Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches
Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. OBJECTIVES: We a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0027 |
_version_ | 1784722098088837120 |
---|---|
author | Bertola, Laiss Benseñor, Isabela Judith Martins Brunoni, Andre Russowsky Caramelli, Paulo Barreto, Sandhi Maria Moreno, Arlinda Barbosa Griep, Rosane Harter Viana, Maria Carmen Lotufo, Paulo Andrade Suemoto, Claudia Kimie |
author_facet | Bertola, Laiss Benseñor, Isabela Judith Martins Brunoni, Andre Russowsky Caramelli, Paulo Barreto, Sandhi Maria Moreno, Arlinda Barbosa Griep, Rosane Harter Viana, Maria Carmen Lotufo, Paulo Andrade Suemoto, Claudia Kimie |
author_sort | Bertola, Laiss |
collection | PubMed |
description | Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to verify the occurrence of the retest effect and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the follow-up scores in a sample of 5,592 participants with a diverse sociodemographic profile, who were assessed twice during 4 years of follow-up. METHODS: We tested two possible approaches to correct the retest effect and calculated the Reliable Change Index. RESULTS: We observed increased scores at the follow-up assessment after 4 years, but the results indicate a modest occurrence of retest effects. The regression difference correction successfully generated follow-up corrected scores, while the mean difference did not provide effective corrections. Sociodemographic characteristics had a minor impact on the retest. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the regression difference correction for retest effects. The absence of this methodological approach might lead to biased results using longitudinal cognitive scores. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9173799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91737992022-06-17 Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches Bertola, Laiss Benseñor, Isabela Judith Martins Brunoni, Andre Russowsky Caramelli, Paulo Barreto, Sandhi Maria Moreno, Arlinda Barbosa Griep, Rosane Harter Viana, Maria Carmen Lotufo, Paulo Andrade Suemoto, Claudia Kimie Dement Neuropsychol Original Article Repeated cognitive assessment in longitudinal studies favors the occurrence of retest effects, usually increasing the scores obtained at the follow-up assessments when compared to baseline. Therefore, retest effects can compromise the evaluation of cognitive decline in older adults. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to verify the occurrence of the retest effect and the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on the follow-up scores in a sample of 5,592 participants with a diverse sociodemographic profile, who were assessed twice during 4 years of follow-up. METHODS: We tested two possible approaches to correct the retest effect and calculated the Reliable Change Index. RESULTS: We observed increased scores at the follow-up assessment after 4 years, but the results indicate a modest occurrence of retest effects. The regression difference correction successfully generated follow-up corrected scores, while the mean difference did not provide effective corrections. Sociodemographic characteristics had a minor impact on the retest. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the regression difference correction for retest effects. The absence of this methodological approach might lead to biased results using longitudinal cognitive scores. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, Departamento de Neurologia Cognitiva e Envelhecimento 2022-04-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9173799/ /pubmed/35720646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0027 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bertola, Laiss Benseñor, Isabela Judith Martins Brunoni, Andre Russowsky Caramelli, Paulo Barreto, Sandhi Maria Moreno, Arlinda Barbosa Griep, Rosane Harter Viana, Maria Carmen Lotufo, Paulo Andrade Suemoto, Claudia Kimie Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title | Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title_full | Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title_fullStr | Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title_full_unstemmed | Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title_short | Retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
title_sort | retest effects in a diverse sample: sociodemographic predictors and possible correction approaches |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9173799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bertolalaiss retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches AT bensenorisabelajudithmartins retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches AT brunoniandrerussowsky retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches AT caramellipaulo retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches AT barretosandhimaria retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches AT morenoarlindabarbosa retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches AT grieprosaneharter retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches AT vianamariacarmen retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches AT lotufopauloandrade retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches AT suemotoclaudiakimie retesteffectsinadiversesamplesociodemographicpredictorsandpossiblecorrectionapproaches |