Cargando…
Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam
BACKGROUND: Only a few studies with small sample sizes have compared electronic Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) rating checklists with traditional paper-based OSCE rating checklists. In this study, the examiner-perceived usability and preference for type of OSCE checklist (electroni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001545 |
_version_ | 1784722157780074496 |
---|---|
author | Wagner, Felicitas L. Feller, Sabine Schmitz, Felix M. Zimmermann, Philippe G. Krings, Rabea Guttormsen, Sissel Huwendiek, Sören |
author_facet | Wagner, Felicitas L. Feller, Sabine Schmitz, Felix M. Zimmermann, Philippe G. Krings, Rabea Guttormsen, Sissel Huwendiek, Sören |
author_sort | Wagner, Felicitas L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Only a few studies with small sample sizes have compared electronic Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) rating checklists with traditional paper-based OSCE rating checklists. In this study, the examiner-perceived usability and preference for type of OSCE checklist (electronic vs. paper based) were compared, and the influence of OSCE checklist type on missed ratings was determined, for the Swiss Federal Licensing Examination in clinical skills for human medicine. METHODS: All examiners in the Swiss Federal Licensing Examination in clinical skills for human medicine were invited over two subsequent years to evaluate the OSCE checklist type they had worked with during the examination. This was based on a questionnaire with 14 closed questions (i.e., demographic, checklist-type experience, perceived usability, checklist type preference). Furthermore, the numbers of missed ratings for the paper-based checklist were recorded. RESULTS: The data from these examiners (n=377) with experience of both OSCE checklist types were analyzed. The electronic OSCE checklist was rated significantly higher on all usability aspects (i.e., ease of use, candidate rating and error correction, clarity, distraction using the checklist, overall satisfaction), except for the speed of registering comments (no significant difference). The majority of the examiners in both years (2014: 54.5%, n=60, 2015: 89.8%, n=230) reported preference for working with the electronic OSCE checklist in the future. Missed ratings were seen for 14.2% of the paper-based OSCE checklists, which were prevented with the electronic OSCE checklists. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic OSCE checklists were rated significantly more user-friendly and were preferred over paper-based OSCE checklists by a broad national sample of examiners, supporting previous results from faculty-level examinations. Furthermore, missed ratings were prevented with the electronic OSCE checklists. Overall, the use of electronic OSCE checklists is therefore advisable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9174065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91740652022-06-10 Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam Wagner, Felicitas L. Feller, Sabine Schmitz, Felix M. Zimmermann, Philippe G. Krings, Rabea Guttormsen, Sissel Huwendiek, Sören GMS J Med Educ Article BACKGROUND: Only a few studies with small sample sizes have compared electronic Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) rating checklists with traditional paper-based OSCE rating checklists. In this study, the examiner-perceived usability and preference for type of OSCE checklist (electronic vs. paper based) were compared, and the influence of OSCE checklist type on missed ratings was determined, for the Swiss Federal Licensing Examination in clinical skills for human medicine. METHODS: All examiners in the Swiss Federal Licensing Examination in clinical skills for human medicine were invited over two subsequent years to evaluate the OSCE checklist type they had worked with during the examination. This was based on a questionnaire with 14 closed questions (i.e., demographic, checklist-type experience, perceived usability, checklist type preference). Furthermore, the numbers of missed ratings for the paper-based checklist were recorded. RESULTS: The data from these examiners (n=377) with experience of both OSCE checklist types were analyzed. The electronic OSCE checklist was rated significantly higher on all usability aspects (i.e., ease of use, candidate rating and error correction, clarity, distraction using the checklist, overall satisfaction), except for the speed of registering comments (no significant difference). The majority of the examiners in both years (2014: 54.5%, n=60, 2015: 89.8%, n=230) reported preference for working with the electronic OSCE checklist in the future. Missed ratings were seen for 14.2% of the paper-based OSCE checklists, which were prevented with the electronic OSCE checklists. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic OSCE checklists were rated significantly more user-friendly and were preferred over paper-based OSCE checklists by a broad national sample of examiners, supporting previous results from faculty-level examinations. Furthermore, missed ratings were prevented with the electronic OSCE checklists. Overall, the use of electronic OSCE checklists is therefore advisable. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2022-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9174065/ /pubmed/35692359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001545 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wagner et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Wagner, Felicitas L. Feller, Sabine Schmitz, Felix M. Zimmermann, Philippe G. Krings, Rabea Guttormsen, Sissel Huwendiek, Sören Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam |
title | Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam |
title_full | Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam |
title_fullStr | Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam |
title_full_unstemmed | Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam |
title_short | Usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil OSCE checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the Swiss Federal Licensing Exam |
title_sort | usability and preference of electronic vs. paper and pencil osce checklists by examiners and influence of checklist type on missed ratings in the swiss federal licensing exam |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001545 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wagnerfelicitasl usabilityandpreferenceofelectronicvspaperandpenciloscechecklistsbyexaminersandinfluenceofchecklisttypeonmissedratingsintheswissfederallicensingexam AT fellersabine usabilityandpreferenceofelectronicvspaperandpenciloscechecklistsbyexaminersandinfluenceofchecklisttypeonmissedratingsintheswissfederallicensingexam AT schmitzfelixm usabilityandpreferenceofelectronicvspaperandpenciloscechecklistsbyexaminersandinfluenceofchecklisttypeonmissedratingsintheswissfederallicensingexam AT zimmermannphilippeg usabilityandpreferenceofelectronicvspaperandpenciloscechecklistsbyexaminersandinfluenceofchecklisttypeonmissedratingsintheswissfederallicensingexam AT kringsrabea usabilityandpreferenceofelectronicvspaperandpenciloscechecklistsbyexaminersandinfluenceofchecklisttypeonmissedratingsintheswissfederallicensingexam AT guttormsensissel usabilityandpreferenceofelectronicvspaperandpenciloscechecklistsbyexaminersandinfluenceofchecklisttypeonmissedratingsintheswissfederallicensingexam AT huwendieksoren usabilityandpreferenceofelectronicvspaperandpenciloscechecklistsbyexaminersandinfluenceofchecklisttypeonmissedratingsintheswissfederallicensingexam |