Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK

INTRODUCTION: iGlarLixi is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise in addition to metformin (with or without sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) to improve glycemic control in adults with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCrimmon, Rory J., Palmer, Karen, Alsaleh, Abdul Jabbar Omar, Lew, Elisheva, Puttanna, Amar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01267-3
_version_ 1784722222464630784
author McCrimmon, Rory J.
Palmer, Karen
Alsaleh, Abdul Jabbar Omar
Lew, Elisheva
Puttanna, Amar
author_facet McCrimmon, Rory J.
Palmer, Karen
Alsaleh, Abdul Jabbar Omar
Lew, Elisheva
Puttanna, Amar
author_sort McCrimmon, Rory J.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: iGlarLixi is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise in addition to metformin (with or without sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) to improve glycemic control in adults with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare iGlarLixi with premix biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with T2D suboptimally controlled with basal insulin (BI). METHODS: The IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model was used to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes for people with T2D from a UK health care perspective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000. Initial clinical data were based on the phase 3 randomized, open-label, active-controlled SoliMix clinical trial which compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily iGlarLixi with that of twice-daily BIAsp 30. Costs associated with management and complications and utilities values were derived from published sources. Lifetime costs (in £GBP) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were predicted; extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Estimated QALYs gained were slightly higher with iGlarLixi (8.9 vs. 8.8) compared with premix BIAsp 30, at a higher cost (£23,204 vs. £21,961). The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY was £13,598. Treatment acquisition was the main driver of cost differences (iGlarLixi, £11,750; premix BIAsp 30, £10,395). Costs associated with management and complications were generally similar between comparators. CONCLUSION: iGlarLixi provides improved QALY outcomes at an acceptable cost compared with premix BIAsp 30, with an ICER below the threshold generally considered acceptable by UK authorities. In people with T2D, iGlarLixi is a simple, cost-effective option for advancing therapy of BI, with fewer daily injections than premix BIAsp 30. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-022-01267-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9174356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91743562022-06-09 Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK McCrimmon, Rory J. Palmer, Karen Alsaleh, Abdul Jabbar Omar Lew, Elisheva Puttanna, Amar Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: iGlarLixi is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise in addition to metformin (with or without sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) to improve glycemic control in adults with insufficiently controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare iGlarLixi with premix biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with T2D suboptimally controlled with basal insulin (BI). METHODS: The IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model was used to estimate lifetime costs and outcomes for people with T2D from a UK health care perspective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000. Initial clinical data were based on the phase 3 randomized, open-label, active-controlled SoliMix clinical trial which compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily iGlarLixi with that of twice-daily BIAsp 30. Costs associated with management and complications and utilities values were derived from published sources. Lifetime costs (in £GBP) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were predicted; extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Estimated QALYs gained were slightly higher with iGlarLixi (8.9 vs. 8.8) compared with premix BIAsp 30, at a higher cost (£23,204 vs. £21,961). The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY was £13,598. Treatment acquisition was the main driver of cost differences (iGlarLixi, £11,750; premix BIAsp 30, £10,395). Costs associated with management and complications were generally similar between comparators. CONCLUSION: iGlarLixi provides improved QALY outcomes at an acceptable cost compared with premix BIAsp 30, with an ICER below the threshold generally considered acceptable by UK authorities. In people with T2D, iGlarLixi is a simple, cost-effective option for advancing therapy of BI, with fewer daily injections than premix BIAsp 30. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-022-01267-3. Springer Healthcare 2022-05-11 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9174356/ /pubmed/35543869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01267-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
McCrimmon, Rory J.
Palmer, Karen
Alsaleh, Abdul Jabbar Omar
Lew, Elisheva
Puttanna, Amar
Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK
title Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK
title_sort cost-effectiveness of iglarlixi versus premix biasp 30 in patients with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled by basal insulin in the uk
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-022-01267-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mccrimmonroryj costeffectivenessofiglarlixiversuspremixbiasp30inpatientswithtype2diabetessuboptimallycontrolledbybasalinsulinintheuk
AT palmerkaren costeffectivenessofiglarlixiversuspremixbiasp30inpatientswithtype2diabetessuboptimallycontrolledbybasalinsulinintheuk
AT alsalehabduljabbaromar costeffectivenessofiglarlixiversuspremixbiasp30inpatientswithtype2diabetessuboptimallycontrolledbybasalinsulinintheuk
AT lewelisheva costeffectivenessofiglarlixiversuspremixbiasp30inpatientswithtype2diabetessuboptimallycontrolledbybasalinsulinintheuk
AT puttannaamar costeffectivenessofiglarlixiversuspremixbiasp30inpatientswithtype2diabetessuboptimallycontrolledbybasalinsulinintheuk