Cargando…

Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods

In this study, the performance of 17 different density functional theory functionals was compared for the calculation of the bond dissociation energy (BDE) values of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic compounds. The effect of the size of the basis set (expansions of 6-31(G)) was also assessed for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trung, Nguyen Quang, Mechler, Adam, Hoa, Nguyen Thi, Vo, Quan V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220177
_version_ 1784722297340297216
author Trung, Nguyen Quang
Mechler, Adam
Hoa, Nguyen Thi
Vo, Quan V.
author_facet Trung, Nguyen Quang
Mechler, Adam
Hoa, Nguyen Thi
Vo, Quan V.
author_sort Trung, Nguyen Quang
collection PubMed
description In this study, the performance of 17 different density functional theory functionals was compared for the calculation of the bond dissociation energy (BDE) values of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic compounds. The effect of the size of the basis set (expansions of 6-31(G)) was also assessed for the initial geometry and zero-point energy calculations, followed by the single-point BDE calculations with different model chemistries with the 6-311 + (3df,2p) basis set. It was found that the size of the basis set for geometry optimization has a much smaller effect on the accuracy of BDE than the choice of functional for the following single-point calculations. The M06-2X, M05-2X and M08−HX functionals yielded highly accurate BDE values compared to experimental data (with the average mean unsigned error MUE = 1.2–1.5 kcal mol(−1)), performing better than any of the other functionals. The results suggest that geometry optimization may be performed with B3LYP functional and a small basis set, whereas the M06-2X, M05-2X and M08-HX density functionals with a suitably large basis set offer the best method for calculating BDEs of ArX−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9174704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91747042022-06-14 Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods Trung, Nguyen Quang Mechler, Adam Hoa, Nguyen Thi Vo, Quan V. R Soc Open Sci Chemistry In this study, the performance of 17 different density functional theory functionals was compared for the calculation of the bond dissociation energy (BDE) values of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic compounds. The effect of the size of the basis set (expansions of 6-31(G)) was also assessed for the initial geometry and zero-point energy calculations, followed by the single-point BDE calculations with different model chemistries with the 6-311 + (3df,2p) basis set. It was found that the size of the basis set for geometry optimization has a much smaller effect on the accuracy of BDE than the choice of functional for the following single-point calculations. The M06-2X, M05-2X and M08−HX functionals yielded highly accurate BDE values compared to experimental data (with the average mean unsigned error MUE = 1.2–1.5 kcal mol(−1)), performing better than any of the other functionals. The results suggest that geometry optimization may be performed with B3LYP functional and a small basis set, whereas the M06-2X, M05-2X and M08-HX density functionals with a suitably large basis set offer the best method for calculating BDEs of ArX−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds. The Royal Society 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9174704/ /pubmed/35706655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220177 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Chemistry
Trung, Nguyen Quang
Mechler, Adam
Hoa, Nguyen Thi
Vo, Quan V.
Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods
title Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods
title_full Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods
title_fullStr Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods
title_full_unstemmed Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods
title_short Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods
title_sort calculating bond dissociation energies of x−h (x=c, n, o, s) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220177
work_keys_str_mv AT trungnguyenquang calculatingbonddissociationenergiesofxhxcnosbondsofaromaticsystemsviadensityfunctionaltheoryadetailedcomparisonofmethods
AT mechleradam calculatingbonddissociationenergiesofxhxcnosbondsofaromaticsystemsviadensityfunctionaltheoryadetailedcomparisonofmethods
AT hoanguyenthi calculatingbonddissociationenergiesofxhxcnosbondsofaromaticsystemsviadensityfunctionaltheoryadetailedcomparisonofmethods
AT voquanv calculatingbonddissociationenergiesofxhxcnosbondsofaromaticsystemsviadensityfunctionaltheoryadetailedcomparisonofmethods