Cargando…
Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods
In this study, the performance of 17 different density functional theory functionals was compared for the calculation of the bond dissociation energy (BDE) values of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic compounds. The effect of the size of the basis set (expansions of 6-31(G)) was also assessed for...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220177 |
_version_ | 1784722297340297216 |
---|---|
author | Trung, Nguyen Quang Mechler, Adam Hoa, Nguyen Thi Vo, Quan V. |
author_facet | Trung, Nguyen Quang Mechler, Adam Hoa, Nguyen Thi Vo, Quan V. |
author_sort | Trung, Nguyen Quang |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study, the performance of 17 different density functional theory functionals was compared for the calculation of the bond dissociation energy (BDE) values of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic compounds. The effect of the size of the basis set (expansions of 6-31(G)) was also assessed for the initial geometry and zero-point energy calculations, followed by the single-point BDE calculations with different model chemistries with the 6-311 + (3df,2p) basis set. It was found that the size of the basis set for geometry optimization has a much smaller effect on the accuracy of BDE than the choice of functional for the following single-point calculations. The M06-2X, M05-2X and M08−HX functionals yielded highly accurate BDE values compared to experimental data (with the average mean unsigned error MUE = 1.2–1.5 kcal mol(−1)), performing better than any of the other functionals. The results suggest that geometry optimization may be performed with B3LYP functional and a small basis set, whereas the M06-2X, M05-2X and M08-HX density functionals with a suitably large basis set offer the best method for calculating BDEs of ArX−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9174704 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91747042022-06-14 Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods Trung, Nguyen Quang Mechler, Adam Hoa, Nguyen Thi Vo, Quan V. R Soc Open Sci Chemistry In this study, the performance of 17 different density functional theory functionals was compared for the calculation of the bond dissociation energy (BDE) values of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic compounds. The effect of the size of the basis set (expansions of 6-31(G)) was also assessed for the initial geometry and zero-point energy calculations, followed by the single-point BDE calculations with different model chemistries with the 6-311 + (3df,2p) basis set. It was found that the size of the basis set for geometry optimization has a much smaller effect on the accuracy of BDE than the choice of functional for the following single-point calculations. The M06-2X, M05-2X and M08−HX functionals yielded highly accurate BDE values compared to experimental data (with the average mean unsigned error MUE = 1.2–1.5 kcal mol(−1)), performing better than any of the other functionals. The results suggest that geometry optimization may be performed with B3LYP functional and a small basis set, whereas the M06-2X, M05-2X and M08-HX density functionals with a suitably large basis set offer the best method for calculating BDEs of ArX−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds. The Royal Society 2022-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9174704/ /pubmed/35706655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220177 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Trung, Nguyen Quang Mechler, Adam Hoa, Nguyen Thi Vo, Quan V. Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods |
title | Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods |
title_full | Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods |
title_fullStr | Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods |
title_short | Calculating bond dissociation energies of X−H (X=C, N, O, S) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods |
title_sort | calculating bond dissociation energies of x−h (x=c, n, o, s) bonds of aromatic systems via density functional theory: a detailed comparison of methods |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9174704/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.220177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT trungnguyenquang calculatingbonddissociationenergiesofxhxcnosbondsofaromaticsystemsviadensityfunctionaltheoryadetailedcomparisonofmethods AT mechleradam calculatingbonddissociationenergiesofxhxcnosbondsofaromaticsystemsviadensityfunctionaltheoryadetailedcomparisonofmethods AT hoanguyenthi calculatingbonddissociationenergiesofxhxcnosbondsofaromaticsystemsviadensityfunctionaltheoryadetailedcomparisonofmethods AT voquanv calculatingbonddissociationenergiesofxhxcnosbondsofaromaticsystemsviadensityfunctionaltheoryadetailedcomparisonofmethods |